• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Medicare rant - its getting bad

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
All of these problems with Medicare and some people want the government to be MORE involved with health care? Yikes.
 
This can only be one of two things:

a) Your doctor only a very small percentage of medicare patients he sees and limits the number of new medicare patients
b) or you just like making bullshit statements for the sake of making them.

My vote is for b
 
Fine, and with that, seniors have been paying into medicare all their lives and most seniors are on it with a supplement. They don't even use private insurance because they don't work. It's rare to see a senior on 100% private insurance, though it happens.

And the supplement business is booming. AARP is a huge supporter of obamacare. You think AARP is a senior citizen lobbying group? No... they are in the business to make money from supplemental insurance. Almost half of AARP's income comes from royalties paid by insurance companies. And most of that income is derived from medicare insurance.
 
Medicare rant - its getting bad

My wife works for a local doctor, the majority of the doctors business is elderly people on medicare.

A couple of days ago medicare sent the doctor a letter saying some of the procedures he did as far back as 2009 were unnecessary, and medicare wants their money back.

Before the procedures were done, someone from the office called medicare to get pre-approval. Medicare approved the procedures and the surgery was done.

The procedures in question were hip and knee replacements.

Think about that for a minute. Medicare approves procedure, 3 years later wants their money back. Why wait 3 years? Why not deny the procedures when they were pre-approved?

One of the ladies at the office is having to go through the records, and fax everything over to medicare to justify the procedure yet again. The office already did this when the patient was approved for the surgery.

Good

A step in the right direction towards destroying Republican opposition to Universal Healthcare for Americans.
 
This can only be one of two things:

a) Your doctor only a very small percentage of medicare patients he sees and limits the number of new medicare patients
b) or you just like making bullshit statements for the sake of making them.

What you can't wrap your tiny GOP mind around my post? You forgot the REAL answer..

c) I don't give a flying fuck if you agree with me or not.
 
Last edited:
Private insurers do this sort of thing all the time. My wife got a botox injection for her migraine headaches. Because the procedure is generally used cosmetically, there often isn't coverage. However, the doctor submitted it to Blue Cross and got it pre-approved. They then denied coverage after the procedure was done. We're still fighting with them over it 9 months later. There should be some sort of law that once something is pre-approved, it cannot be later denied absent a finding of fraud. It should apply to Medicare and private insurance both.
 
Good

A step in the right direction towards destroying Republican opposition to Universal Healthcare for Americans.

Didn't hillary run on a campaign of universal health care?

But after the insurance companies donated enough money, she sat down and shut up. The democrats are a sell out just like everyone else.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/12/nyregion/12donate.html?pagewanted=all

After enough donations, hillary changed her mind so that everyone would be required to buy insurance.
 
Private insurers do this sort of thing all the time. My wife got a botox injection for her migraine headaches. Because the procedure is generally used cosmetically, there often isn't coverage. However, the doctor submitted it to Blue Cross and got it pre-approved. They then denied coverage after the procedure was done. We're still fighting with them over it 9 months later. There should be some sort of law that once something is pre-approved, it cannot be later denied absent a finding of fraud. It should apply to Medicare and private insurance both.

All insurance is a PIA at times. The difference is degree. If you talk with people in billing they cringe at private insurance but rant when a government entity is mentioned. It was so bad in NY that the state threw in the towel and farmed 3/4 of Medicaid claims to private concerns. Within a month the system was running better than ever.

Still, the system as a whole needs a lot of work but the consensus seems to be to impliment first and see what happens.
 
All of these problems with Medicare and some people want the government to be MORE involved with health care? Yikes.

It's almost like they see the 20 or so countries ahead of the US with better overall health outcomes and notice that they all have UHC. Then they look a little further and see that those countries pay a fraction of the amount for their care that we do in the US and jump to the wildly invalid conclusion that it might work here...
 
All insurance is a PIA at times. The difference is degree. If you talk with people in billing they cringe at private insurance but rant when a government entity is mentioned. It was so bad in NY that the state threw in the towel and farmed 3/4 of Medicaid claims to private concerns. Within a month the system was running better than ever.

Still, the system as a whole needs a lot of work but the consensus seems to be to impliment first and see what happens.

Bear in mind that government agencies have two basic characteristics that can make them harder to deal with: the first is that they operate on hard-capped budgets and they don't necessarily have lots of people to staff phone banks. The second is that the rules they operate under are more likely laws than mere company policy. That gives them less discretion to bend their rules where it would seem to make sense in an individual case. That said, some government agencies are easier to deal with than others. The same is true with corporations. Ever try to get any sort of customer service from a company like AT&T or Comcast? The nightmare is indescribable.
 
No, they'll just fill up emergency rooms and make care that much more expensive for everyone that does have insurance.

Emergency rooms will not fix chronic conditions. They will die because they are not getting proper and regular treatment. However, what ER visits they do use will be paid by the taxpayer, so that part is correct.
 
Emergency rooms will not fix chronic conditions. They will die because they are not getting proper and regular treatment. However, what ER visits they do use will be paid by the taxpayer, so that part is correct.

Generally untreated chronic conditions result in at least one acute episode which ends up with someone in the emergency room (ie: untreated high blood pressure leads to someone in the emergency room because of a heart attack). Some will die before they get to the hospital, but a lot of them will end up getting expensive emergency treatment that the hospital isn't reimbursed for, the cost of which gets passed on to the insured patients.
 
To the OP, one of my last, commercial, health insurance plans did exactly the same thing: I would get procedures pre-approved, and they denied every single one of them, requiring me to hassle with their customer support in each individual instance.

I guess they'd figured out that the number of clueless, or really sick or dead patients who wouldn't dispute things in a timely fashion would add to their profit margin.
 
My mom went to the Hospital a month ago (she is fine now) but the Ambulance ride with 2 Paramedics to the Hospital less than 2 miles away got billed to Medicare at $960. That is what is wrong with the system.
 
All of these problems with Medicare and some people want the government to be MORE involved with health care? Yikes.

Yes, private insurance is SO problem-free, cost-effective, free of corruption, providing what the country needs with 40 million uninsured, etc. With voters like you...
 
My mom went to the Hospital a month ago (she is fine now) but the Ambulance ride with 2 Paramedics to the Hospital less than 2 miles away got billed to Medicare at $960. That is what is wrong with the system.

So these trained people are collecting pay while waiting with an expensive vehicle and all it's gear waiting for someone to call and this service is available 24/7. So they spend what, an hour taking your mother to the hospital? Have you considered that these people aren't getting paid piecework?

Google says there are 8766 hours in a year and every one of them has someone waiting to save your mother's and others lives. You want them paid only when they are hauling people. Next time take a cab. Think of all the money you'll save.
 
Yes, private insurance is SO problem-free, cost-effective, free of corruption, providing what the country needs with 40 million uninsured, etc. With voters like you...

How would Craig know anyway? He blocks out everyone he finds "unworthy" 😀
 
My mom went to the Hospital a month ago (she is fine now) but the Ambulance ride with 2 Paramedics to the Hospital less than 2 miles away got billed to Medicare at $960. That is what is wrong with the system.

There is quite a bit wrong with the system.
 
Back
Top