Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: tboo
Here is the link to the article.
Doesnt Prince Fielder suck this year? Also his "natures strongest athletes are vegetarians" comment is a strech.
You mean cheetahs chase gazelles for fun?
Originally posted by: Baked
Whales eat shrimps by the tons. Ants eat other animals, alive. What the hell is he talking about strong athletes being hippies. Ok, maybe elephants.
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: Baked
Whales eat shrimps by the tons. Ants eat other animals, alive. What the hell is he talking about strong athletes being hippies. Ok, maybe elephants.
Don't forget, whales = fat. Fat = bad. Whales = bad.
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: tboo
Here is the link to the article.
Doesnt Prince Fielder suck this year? Also his "natures strongest athletes are vegetarians" comment is a strech.
You mean cheetahs chase gazelles for fun?
Cheetahs are fast, not so much strong. I'm not necessarily saying the dude's analogy has merit, but cheetahs are not the best example to use.
I would go so far as to say a LOT of the world's "strongest" animals are vegetarians.
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
That was one of the most idiotic articles in the history of journalism.
1. *ONE* athlete going vegy doesn't equate to any pattern of power. The author says that he hit the most homes runs in Brewer history. So what? It's the *BREWERS* for fucks sake. He ignores every other slugger in history that have eaten meat.
2. Author then rants against processed meats, using a study of cancer to say they are horrible to eat, providing support for his assertion that one Brewer is proof that veggy is the way to go. However, he can only use ONE form of meat (and a poor one at that) to fight against *ALL* meat. This is more than 50% of his article. Not all meat is processed meat, so who cares?
3. He goes on to say that there are benefits to not eating *ALL* meat, which supposedly makes this 100mi runner a perfect example. Yet what about all of the runners and athletes that have eaten meat throughout history? AFAIK, Lance Armstrong isn't a veghead.
What if that guy who is a veghead and runs 100mi has something else his body has as an advantage? One advantage LA has is an incredible pain tolerence and an above normal lung capacity.
The whole premise of the article is just a pandering shill piece of vegetarians. It's pathetic.
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: tboo
Here is the link to the article.
Doesnt Prince Fielder suck this year? Also his "natures strongest athletes are vegetarians" comment is a strech.
You mean cheetahs chase gazelles for fun?
Cheetahs are fast, not so much strong. I'm not necessarily saying the dude's analogy has merit, but cheetahs are not the best example to use.
I would go so far as to say a LOT of the world's "strongest" animals are vegetarians.
takes a lot of power to propel yourself to 100+kmph...they could probably keep on going except for the overheat.
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: tboo
Here is the link to the article.
Doesnt Prince Fielder suck this year? Also his "natures strongest athletes are vegetarians" comment is a strech.
You mean cheetahs chase gazelles for fun?
Cheetahs are fast, not so much strong. I'm not necessarily saying the dude's analogy has merit, but cheetahs are not the best example to use.
I would go so far as to say a LOT of the world's "strongest" animals are vegetarians.
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: tboo
Here is the link to the article.
Doesnt Prince Fielder suck this year? Also his "natures strongest athletes are vegetarians" comment is a strech.
You mean cheetahs chase gazelles for fun?
Cheetahs are fast, not so much strong. I'm not necessarily saying the dude's analogy has merit, but cheetahs are not the best example to use.
I would go so far as to say a LOT of the world's "strongest" animals are vegetarians.
takes a lot of power to propel yourself to 100+kmph...they could probably keep on going except for the overheat.
It takes some leg power, but it's not really a brute strength thing. Look at human sprinters, they're usually pretty buff but not like weightlifters or anything.
Again, I'm only talking about power output here. Cheetahs can run really fast for a few seconds, but how much weight could they pull behind them? It's two different things.
Originally posted by: Kaido
One of the guys who won Ironman Hawaii 6 times in a row was a vegetarian for the duration of his training. But I think it boils down to genetics. If you've read about V02 max and all that stuff, being a top athlete pretty much boils down to what you're born with. There was an old guy in the news, I think 101 years old, who still runs marathons. And smokes while he's running. And goes to the pub in the morning before the race for a pint.
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: tboo
Here is the link to the article.
Doesnt Prince Fielder suck this year? Also his "natures strongest athletes are vegetarians" comment is a strech.
You mean cheetahs chase gazelles for fun?
Cheetahs are fast, not so much strong. I'm not necessarily saying the dude's analogy has merit, but cheetahs are not the best example to use.
I would go so far as to say a LOT of the world's "strongest" animals are vegetarians.
takes a lot of power to propel yourself to 100+kmph...they could probably keep on going except for the overheat.
It takes some leg power, but it's not really a brute strength thing. Look at human sprinters, they're usually pretty buff but not like weightlifters or anything.
Again, I'm only talking about power output here. Cheetahs can run really fast for a few seconds, but how much weight could they pull behind them? It's two different things.
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: tboo
Here is the link to the article.
Doesnt Prince Fielder suck this year? Also his "natures strongest athletes are vegetarians" comment is a strech.
You mean cheetahs chase gazelles for fun?
Cheetahs are fast, not so much strong. I'm not necessarily saying the dude's analogy has merit, but cheetahs are not the best example to use.
I would go so far as to say a LOT of the world's "strongest" animals are vegetarians.
takes a lot of power to propel yourself to 100+kmph...they could probably keep on going except for the overheat.
It takes some leg power, but it's not really a brute strength thing. Look at human sprinters, they're usually pretty buff but not like weightlifters or anything.
Again, I'm only talking about power output here. Cheetahs can run really fast for a few seconds, but how much weight could they pull behind them? It's two different things.
So the big fat kid you who have anchor your tug of war team is the strongest or just the one with the greatest mass?
Originally posted by: glutenberg
You can't really compare a fat kid with the sheer power of an elephant or hippo or rhino. There are definitely very strong herbivores out there but I'd still say that there are far more strong omnivores out there.
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Is this article some sort of joke? Prince Fielder is a fat bastard.
http://www.theonion.com/conten...s/Prince-Fielder-R.jpg
http://bricksandivyradio.com/p...s/prince_turkeyleg.jpg
If he's a vegetarian, he's doing it wrong!
