• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

McCain getting slammed by his own party members

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
Originally posted by: Corbett

I'm not spinning anything. I'm talking about how you stole your title and have no original thought. Why would I debate somethng with someone who has no original thought. Again, just admit you stole your headline and we can move on.
Click to expand...

Hey, we're debating someone with no original thought - it's not so bad!

FWIW, when I link to an article, I always use the original headline. I also, as juddog did, contribute my own thoughts on it. I guess I too lack "original thought," eh?
Click to expand...

I guess following the rules for the AT political forum makes you have "no original thought".

Hey Corbett, you might want to let the Anandtech moderators know that they have no original thought for setting up a sticky at the top of the forum:
http://forums.anandtech.com/me...=1833582&enterthread=y
 
Originally posted by: Hugh H
Back in 2004, a Republican once said that the worst thing that could happen to the Republican Party was for George Bush to win the election... because it would later alter the electorate map to favor the Democratic Party for years to come. I think he was right.
Click to expand...

Almost every President weakens his party's standing over the course of 4 years. Bush in 2000 is pretty much the lone exception.
 
Originally posted by: Corbett


My whole point is that you have no original thought have have to copy and paste ideas from what you read over at Digg. Try to dodge all you want but it doesnt change the fact that you stole your headline form Digg and are now trying to excuse it.
Click to expand...

So your idea of original thought is to attack a point of view because it appeared somewhere else too, or to dismiss it because the first place it appears is populated by people you claim are morons? How much more unoriginally moronic could we ask for? Let me guess. You are one of the faithful Republican morons who does support McSame.
 
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
Originally posted by: Corbett

I'm not spinning anything. I'm talking about how you stole your title and have no original thought. Why would I debate somethng with someone who has no original thought. Again, just admit you stole your headline and we can move on.
Click to expand...

Hey, we're debating someone with no original thought - it's not so bad!

FWIW, when I link to an article, I always use the original headline. I also, as juddog did, contribute my own thoughts on it. I guess I too lack "original thought," eh?
Click to expand...

No you see, the Youtube video he posted has not mention of the title here. So with your line of reasoning, he is wrong. You see, he ripped this from Digg and even stole the headline, which is becoming a common theme around here.

When referring to articles, yes, it is common to use the headline. And thats exactly what Juddog did here. He stole it from Digg and posted the same title. He just wont admit it.
 
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
Originally posted by: Corbett

I'm not spinning anything. I'm talking about how you stole your title and have no original thought. Why would I debate somethng with someone who has no original thought. Again, just admit you stole your headline and we can move on.
Click to expand...

Hey, we're debating someone with no original thought - it's not so bad!

FWIW, when I link to an article, I always use the original headline. I also, as juddog did, contribute my own thoughts on it. I guess I too lack "original thought," eh?
Click to expand...

No you see, the Youtube video he posted has not mention of the title here. So with your line of reasoning, he is wrong. You see, he ripped this from Digg and even stole the headline, which is becoming a common theme around here.

When referring to articles, yes, it is common to use the headline. And thats exactly what Juddog did here. He stole it from Digg and posted the same title. He just wont admit it.
Click to expand...

So what? Why the hell does it matter? Ignore the thread or contribute, douchebag.

-Robert
 
Originally posted by: chess9
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
Originally posted by: Corbett

I'm not spinning anything. I'm talking about how you stole your title and have no original thought. Why would I debate somethng with someone who has no original thought. Again, just admit you stole your headline and we can move on.
Click to expand...

Hey, we're debating someone with no original thought - it's not so bad!

FWIW, when I link to an article, I always use the original headline. I also, as juddog did, contribute my own thoughts on it. I guess I too lack "original thought," eh?
Click to expand...

No you see, the Youtube video he posted has not mention of the title here. So with your line of reasoning, he is wrong. You see, he ripped this from Digg and even stole the headline, which is becoming a common theme around here.

When referring to articles, yes, it is common to use the headline. And thats exactly what Juddog did here. He stole it from Digg and posted the same title. He just wont admit it.
Click to expand...

So what? Why the hell does it matter? Ignore the thread or contribute, douchebag.

-Robert
Click to expand...

Good. So Don Vito and Chess agree he stole the headline. Now if Juddog will just admit it we can move on.
 
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
Originally posted by: Corbett

I'm not spinning anything. I'm talking about how you stole your title and have no original thought. Why would I debate somethng with someone who has no original thought. Again, just admit you stole your headline and we can move on.
Click to expand...

Hey, we're debating someone with no original thought - it's not so bad!

FWIW, when I link to an article, I always use the original headline. I also, as juddog did, contribute my own thoughts on it. I guess I too lack "original thought," eh?
Click to expand...

No you see, the Youtube video he posted has not mention of the title here. So with your line of reasoning, he is wrong. You see, he ripped this from Digg and even stole the headline, which is becoming a common theme around here.

When referring to articles, yes, it is common to use the headline. And thats exactly what Juddog did here. He stole it from Digg and posted the same title. He just wont admit it.
Click to expand...

This has what to do with the issue again? Oh yeah - nothing. Keep spinning, coward.
 
Originally posted by: Juddog
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
Originally posted by: Corbett

I'm not spinning anything. I'm talking about how you stole your title and have no original thought. Why would I debate somethng with someone who has no original thought. Again, just admit you stole your headline and we can move on.
Click to expand...

Hey, we're debating someone with no original thought - it's not so bad!

FWIW, when I link to an article, I always use the original headline. I also, as juddog did, contribute my own thoughts on it. I guess I too lack "original thought," eh?
Click to expand...

No you see, the Youtube video he posted has not mention of the title here. So with your line of reasoning, he is wrong. You see, he ripped this from Digg and even stole the headline, which is becoming a common theme around here.

When referring to articles, yes, it is common to use the headline. And thats exactly what Juddog did here. He stole it from Digg and posted the same title. He just wont admit it.
Click to expand...

This has what to do with the issue again? Oh yeah - nothing. Keep spinning, coward.
Click to expand...

Please go look up what "spinning" actually is. Or better yet, copy and paste it. You seem to be good at that.
 
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Juddog
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
Originally posted by: Corbett

I'm not spinning anything. I'm talking about how you stole your title and have no original thought. Why would I debate somethng with someone who has no original thought. Again, just admit you stole your headline and we can move on.
Click to expand...

Hey, we're debating someone with no original thought - it's not so bad!

FWIW, when I link to an article, I always use the original headline. I also, as juddog did, contribute my own thoughts on it. I guess I too lack "original thought," eh?
Click to expand...

No you see, the Youtube video he posted has not mention of the title here. So with your line of reasoning, he is wrong. You see, he ripped this from Digg and even stole the headline, which is becoming a common theme around here.

When referring to articles, yes, it is common to use the headline. And thats exactly what Juddog did here. He stole it from Digg and posted the same title. He just wont admit it.
Click to expand...

This has what to do with the issue again? Oh yeah - nothing. Keep spinning, coward.
Click to expand...

Please go look up what "spinning" actually is. Or better yet, copy and paste it. You seem to be good at that.
Click to expand...

You seem to be good at being a coward and avoiding the actual issue. Keep digging, your hole just got deeper.
 
Originally posted by: Juddog
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Juddog
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
Originally posted by: Corbett

I'm not spinning anything. I'm talking about how you stole your title and have no original thought. Why would I debate somethng with someone who has no original thought. Again, just admit you stole your headline and we can move on.
Click to expand...

Hey, we're debating someone with no original thought - it's not so bad!

FWIW, when I link to an article, I always use the original headline. I also, as juddog did, contribute my own thoughts on it. I guess I too lack "original thought," eh?
Click to expand...

No you see, the Youtube video he posted has not mention of the title here. So with your line of reasoning, he is wrong. You see, he ripped this from Digg and even stole the headline, which is becoming a common theme around here.

When referring to articles, yes, it is common to use the headline. And thats exactly what Juddog did here. He stole it from Digg and posted the same title. He just wont admit it.
Click to expand...

This has what to do with the issue again? Oh yeah - nothing. Keep spinning, coward.
Click to expand...

Please go look up what "spinning" actually is. Or better yet, copy and paste it. You seem to be good at that.
Click to expand...

You seem to be good at being a coward and avoiding the actual issue. Keep digging, your hole just got deeper.
Click to expand...

And you seem to be good at lying that you didn't steal this headline from digg.
 
Originally posted by: Corbett

Good. So Don Vito and Chess agree he stole the headline. Now if Juddog will just admit it we can move on.
Click to expand...

No, I just don't care if he "stole" it. I looked on Digg and don't see his headline anyway, but I find Digg confusing and annoying and so don't ever go there or really know how to navigate it.

In any event, to recap, you're acting like a baby whose diapers need changing, and you're adding nothing to the discussion. Is that pretty much it or do you have anything to add to the topic?
 
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
Originally posted by: Corbett

Good. So Don Vito and Chess agree he stole the headline. Now if Juddog will just admit it we can move on.
Click to expand...

No, I just don't care if he "stole" it. I looked on Digg and don't see his headline anyway, but I find Digg confusing and annoying and so don't ever go there or really know how to navigate it.
Click to expand...

The link is in this thread. It was front page stuff this morning. Its almost identical to what Juddog chose for the topic.
 
Originally posted by: Juddog
Originally posted by: Corbett
More nonsense
Click to expand...

You realize you're just bumping the thread and making yourself look bad at this point, right?
Click to expand...

Probably. But I could care less. Point is, you stole your talking point from the liberals at Digg and wont admit it.
 
Originally posted by: Corbett

The link is in this thread. It was front page stuff this morning. Its almost identical to what Juddog chose for the topic.
Click to expand...

OK - it's now official. Until I went to the Digg link, I didn't know the full extent of your idiocy.

The Digg headline is:

GOP Rats Jumping Off Good Ship McCain watch!

youtube.com ? The nation can thank Sarah Palin for the destruction of McCain.
Click to expand...

It is neither the same headline, nor even the same topic summary as juddog's. The phrase "rats fleeing a sinking ship" is hardly new or innovative, but in any case juddog did not even use the same phrase as the article. His title, topic summary, and OP were totally different.

You, sir, are a jackass, and can't face the music that your own party is righteously pissed at its own candidate for running a shitty, losing campaign. Until and unless you address the topic itself, your posts warrant no further comment.
 
Originally posted by: Juddog
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Juddog
Originally posted by: Corbett
More nonsense
Click to expand...

I have no original thought and steal talking points from liberals at Digg;
Click to expand...

This is fun!
Click to expand...

Your argument holds about as much weight as a Jack Thompson court case.
Click to expand...

Your thread title holds about as much originality as Obama's plans for America (aka - none)
 
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Juddog
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Juddog
Originally posted by: Corbett
More nonsense
Click to expand...

I have no original thought and steal talking points from liberals at Digg;
Click to expand...

This is fun!
Click to expand...

Your argument holds about as much weight as a Jack Thompson court case.
Click to expand...

Your thread title holds about as much originality as Obama's plans for America (aka - none)
Click to expand...

You stole that thought. Evidenced here.

"Obama's "New Plan"
...for failure.
by Frederick W. Kagan
09/13/2007 12:00:00 AM

IN A SPEECH THAT will no doubt be hailed by the left as bold and original, Senator Barack Obama today unveiled "his" plan for a "responsible" withdrawal of U.S. combat forces from Iraq by the end of 2009. The plan may be bold, but it is certainly not original."


Unitl you admit that you stole this thought from a right wing news outlet, there is no point in debating the topic.

Admit you were wrong.

Admit you stole that idea.

Admit it!
 
Originally posted by: Corbett


And you seem to be good at lying that you didn't steal this headline from digg.
Click to expand...

Listen, this is Politics & News forum. All of us who post here post the news with headlines 'stolen' from the news source.

Dunno what you are making an issue about? This is effing normal.

Get a life.

 
Originally posted by: GroundedSailor
Originally posted by: Corbett


And you seem to be good at lying that you didn't steal this headline from digg.
Click to expand...

Listen, this is Politics & News forum. All of us who post here post the news with headlines 'stolen' from the news source.

Dunno what you are making an issue about? This is effing normal.

Get a life.
Click to expand...

I'm making an issue of Juddog's lying about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top