• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Mazda3 pic; Cavalier replacement officially named "Cobalt" **Update 6/29** New Cobalt PIC

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: werk
Originally posted by: Cfour
Heres the pic that GM released on accident. This is blown up and zoomed in from the original, which featured a wodden Cadillac 16 model or something...

Cobalt Rear

AAAAHHH!!!! IT'S A MAN, BABY!!!!

AHHH I spoke too soon! I knew there was no way Chevy would let a decent looking car roll out of the factory!
 
Lol, I wouldn't jude this car on a very early body finish, and certainly not a 1/4 view of the car. This picture was obviously not intended to be released, so obviously GM doesn't want the public to see an early, unfinished version of this vehicle.
 
Originally posted by: Cfour
Lol, I wouldn't jude this car on a very early body finish, and certainly not a 1/4 view of the car. This picture was obviously not intended to be released, so obviously GM doesn't want the public to see an early, unfinished version of this vehicle.

I said the rear end of it was ugly from the picture. I said the front was pretty nice looking~ from a previous post.

 
Originally posted by: isekii
Originally posted by: Cfour
Lol, I wouldn't jude this car on a very early body finish, and certainly not a 1/4 view of the car. This picture was obviously not intended to be released, so obviously GM doesn't want the public to see an early, unfinished version of this vehicle.

I said the rear end of it was ugly from the picture. I said the front was pretty nice looking~ from a previous post.

I know, my post wasn't entirey directed at you.
 
Originally posted by: Cfour
Lol, I wouldn't jude this car on a very early body finish, and certainly not a 1/4 view of the car. This picture was obviously not intended to be released, so obviously GM doesn't want the public to see an early, unfinished version of this vehicle.
haha...I was actually talking about Janet Reno's stunt double in the pic. 🙂

 
Originally posted by: Vortex22
Originally posted by: werk
Originally posted by: Cfour
Heres the pic that GM released on accident. This is blown up and zoomed in from the original, which featured a wodden Cadillac 16 model or something...

Cobalt Rear

AAAAHHH!!!! IT'S A MAN, BABY!!!!

AHHH I spoke too soon! I knew there was no way Chevy would let a decent looking car roll out of the factory!

Vette?
 
Originally posted by: Cfour
Originally posted by: Vortex22
Originally posted by: werk
Originally posted by: Cfour
Heres the pic that GM released on accident. This is blown up and zoomed in from the original, which featured a wodden Cadillac 16 model or something...

Cobalt Rear

AAAAHHH!!!! IT'S A MAN, BABY!!!!

AHHH I spoke too soon! I knew there was no way Chevy would let a decent looking car roll out of the factory!

Vette?

Exactly
 
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Shantanu
Originally posted by: isekii
Originally posted by: Cfour
Heres the pic that GM released on accident. This is blown up and zoomed in from the original, which featured a wodden Cadillac 16 model or something...

Cobalt Rear

that's pretty ugly

Not as ugly as that POS IS300 you drive.

Dude, are you ALWAYS PMS'ing like this??

Maybe he plans on purchasing one of those, and I hurt his feelings saying the rear end of it was ugly. It looks exactly like a Neon's rear
 
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Shantanu
Originally posted by: isekii
Originally posted by: Cfour
Heres the pic that GM released on accident. This is blown up and zoomed in from the original, which featured a wodden Cadillac 16 model or something...

Cobalt Rear

that's pretty ugly

Not as ugly as that POS IS300 you drive.

Dude, are you ALWAYS PMS'ing like this??

I think he's insecure with himself. By belittleing isekii's ride, he feels better about his CTS...you know cause he paid so much money for it..and GM's beautiful depreciation made it worth 2/3rds of its original price.
 
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Shantanu
Originally posted by: isekii
Originally posted by: Cfour
Heres the pic that GM released on accident. This is blown up and zoomed in from the original, which featured a wodden Cadillac 16 model or something...

Cobalt Rear

that's pretty ugly

Not as ugly as that POS IS300 you drive.

Dude, are you ALWAYS PMS'ing like this??

I think he's insecure with himself. By belittleing isekii's ride, he feels better about his CTS...you know cause he paid so much money for it..and GM's beautiful depreciation made it worth 2/3rds of its original price.

:Q😛😀

Maybe he got smoked off the line by a G35 and he's still bitter about it 😀
 
Arguments regarding looks are stupid, as they are subjective. Just saying that saves countless posts that are worthless to make.
 
I wonder how the quailty Mazda is now that it is part of Ford.

I have 93 mazda b2200 with 230,000 miles and still running strong. This truck is pre-ford era.

 
Originally posted by: Cfour
Arguments regarding looks are stupid, as they are subjective. Just saying that saves countless posts that are worthless to make.

true, but we dont know anything about its drivetrain/specs so theres nothig really we can discuss except for looks. 😛
 
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: Cfour
Arguments regarding looks are stupid, as they are subjective. Just saying that saves countless posts that are worthless to make.

true, but we dont know anything about its drivetrain/specs so theres nothig really we can discuss except for looks. 😛

I think he was referring to the IS300 and the CTS.

that dude diss's my is300 when he drives a CTS and i made a comment about it.

lol
 
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: Cfour
Arguments regarding looks are stupid, as they are subjective. Just saying that saves countless posts that are worthless to make.

true, but we dont know anything about its drivetrain/specs so theres nothig really we can discuss except for looks. 😛

Cobalt uses the new Delta platform and engines while the Mazda3 uses Ford's new "global" FWD platform shared between the upcoming next-gen Focus and Volvo S40
 
Originally posted by: isekii
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: Cfour
Arguments regarding looks are stupid, as they are subjective. Just saying that saves countless posts that are worthless to make.

true, but we dont know anything about its drivetrain/specs so theres nothig really we can discuss except for looks. 😛

I think he was referring to the IS300 and the CTS.

that dude diss's my is300 when he drives a CTS and i made a comment about it.

lol

Correct 🙂
 
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: Cfour
Arguments regarding looks are stupid, as they are subjective. Just saying that saves countless posts that are worthless to make.

true, but we dont know anything about its drivetrain/specs so theres nothig really we can discuss except for looks. 😛

Cobalt uses the new Delta platform and engines while the Mazda3 uses Ford's new "global" FWD platform shared between the upcoming next-gen Focus and Volvo S40
Who's actually developing the Ford C-segment platform? I know the Mazda6 chassis was developed in house by Mazda. Will the same hold true for the Mazda3?

Also, nobody's posted chassis size specs yet.:frown:
 
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: Cfour
Arguments regarding looks are stupid, as they are subjective. Just saying that saves countless posts that are worthless to make.

true, but we dont know anything about its drivetrain/specs so theres nothig really we can discuss except for looks. 😛

Cobalt uses the new Delta platform and engines while the Mazda3 uses Ford's new "global" FWD platform shared between the upcoming next-gen Focus and Volvo S40
Who's actually developing the Ford C-segment platform? I know the Mazda6 chassis was developed in house by Mazda. Will the same hold true for the Mazda3?

Also, nobody's posted chassis size specs yet.:frown:

Mazda developed the Mazda 3 inhouse (which will replace the current Protege). Pics of the Mazda3 sedan havent been released yet, just the hatchback so far.

Ford is gonna use the current Mazda6 platform for a whole host of cars, I think they even plan a small SUV out of it. Also, the Mazda3's chassis is basis for the Focus.
 
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: Cfour
Arguments regarding looks are stupid, as they are subjective. Just saying that saves countless posts that are worthless to make.

true, but we dont know anything about its drivetrain/specs so theres nothig really we can discuss except for looks. 😛

Cobalt uses the new Delta platform and engines while the Mazda3 uses Ford's new "global" FWD platform shared between the upcoming next-gen Focus and Volvo S40
Who's actually developing the Ford C-segment platform? I know the Mazda6 chassis was developed in house by Mazda. Will the same hold true for the Mazda3?

Also, nobody's posted chassis size specs yet.:frown:

Mazda developed the Mazda 3 inhouse (which will replace the current Protege). Pics of the Mazda3 sedan havent been released yet, just the hatchback so far.

Ford is gonna use the current Mazda6 platform for a whole host of cars, I think they even plan a small SUV out of it. Also, the Mazda3's chassis is basis for the Focus.
Amidst the stuff I already knew, I believe you answered my question.😉😛 All I needed to hear was, "Mazda developed the Mazda 3 inhouse."

Ok, I've checked out the link to the size specs. A shame I can't read japanese. Anybody care to translate some of this - most notably the dimensions?
 
Back
Top