• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

mayors say we don't care about holiday political correctness

good for them.
lighting a christmas tree has long been an AMERICAN tradition.
if you find it offensive, you're free to leave our country.
if you want to light your menorah, or whatever quanza celebrators do, you're free to do that on your own.

New Jersey mayors are being warned to be careful before approving municipal holiday decorations this year and to consider asking an attorney’s advice before anything gets plugged in.

New Jersey League of Municipalities President William Dressel Jr. sent a letter out to several of the state’s mayors to offer them guidance on what he calls a tricky legal issue, according to the Bergen County Record.

But many North Jersey officials said they plan to keep following tradition instead of the advice of attorneys when it comes to their towns’ displays.

"We don't plan or consult," said Paramus Mayor Richard LaBarbiera, whose town puts up an annual display of a lighted holiday tree and a menorah. “That's how it's always been done. It's not controversial, and I hope it never will be in town."

Totowa Mayor John Coiro said he is not concerned about his town’s lighted tree, because it is "a symbol of the season and not necessarily of any particular religion."

However, Municipal League attorney Matthew Weng said municipal holiday displays can cause the potential for problems that could lead to a costly lawsuit.

"Not only legally, but politically, you can run the risk of offending a large portion of your residents if you do it incorrectly, if you exclude some," Weng said. "You also run the risk of what could be a costly lawsuit. You either include everybody or you exclude everybody.

For example, towns can include religious symbols in their displays, as long as they include more than one religion. That has caused many municipal buildings to go overboard, displaying snowmen, reindeer, the Nativity, menorahs and Kwanzaa candelabras all at the same time.

Read more on Newsmax.com: NJ Mayors Warned About Holiday Displays
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!
 
Last edited:
Well I like this thinking . If I don't like something . All I need to do is whine . and the needs of the few overshadow the needs of the many. Now thats the new AMERICA . Boy I am all aboard on that kind of thinking . I want to be paid the same as ecutives . I wonder how they jump that rope .
 
They can hire the OWS crowd...would not be illegal...oh, and they would not actually work either...especially if bathing is a requirement.

Hmm...not sure, since the OWS crowd is out, have to think about it.
 
Great news! its nice to hear something like this from time to time, I gives me hope, all is not lost, we can still get up and get back on out feet. Very heart warming. two thumbs up.
 
Yep.

Provided the government allows for the religious symbols of each recognized religion to be displayed during their holy days, there is no problem with any of it.

Govt does not prohibit that, a park in the downtown display our religious symbol and even swastika during Diwali (one Hindu festival) Menorah are also all over the place, noone gets arrested. shut the fvck up, stop trolling and GTFO.
 
Govt does not prohibit that, a park in the downtown display our religious symbol and even swastika during Diwali (one Hindu festival) Menorah are also all over the place, noone gets arrested. shut the fvck up, stop trolling and GTFO.

What do you find bad about my post? Please quote the exact part you are having a problem with.

It appears you agree with me, and are mad about it.
 
It's good to see. IMO, both of these groups of people are idiots:

1. The "there's a war on Christmas!!!" people.

and

2. The "you can't put a religious symbol in a public place!!!" or "it's a Holiday tree!!" people.
 
Meh, no harm, no foul. VERY VERY easy to do on the Internet. I am sure I do it often enough.

Now give me a big hug, in a completely manly and non-sexual way. 😉

2dujvjl.jpg
 
Democracy must be more than a sheep telling two wolves they must be vegetarians.

....nor should it be two wolves discussing lunch, if I might also abuse the same quote.


OTOH, I'd much rather see the energy spent on more real life problems than "solving" the great "my god has a bigger dick than your god" issue through some juvenile form of social castration.

Or in plain language: There are much larger issues to stuff sand in collective vaginas over.

< This is one of those annoying 4G LTE Droid Bionic Tapatalk tags. Have a nice day. >
 
I'm an atheist, I'm against state run religious displays. A xmas tree is a freaking tree. It is unrelated to the Christian belief of the birth of a boy in Nazareth. I personally celebrate the late-Decemeber gift-giving secular holiday, with some tree on the side.
 
It'd be even more brilliant if not for the fact that it is a variation of a quote from libertarian author James Bovard:

Yep, unabashedly created mine from his. Both the tyranny of the minority and the tyranny of the majority are evil. But he forgot the first part of that.
 
SO long as it does not interfere with my daily business, I really do not care.

Ironically, what people should be complaining about is the government holiday allowed for a religious observance, NOT the decorations provided.

But I have yet to hear one Hindu, Jew, Muslim or other religious person complain about taking the 25th......

Nobody has a problem with other religions if it means they do not have to go to work that day.
 
$$ = tiny.

It would cost more money to debate it (professional hours billed) than it would just to buy some damn tinsel and string it up main street.

Again, stupid debate.
 
Back
Top