Probably because they know that most of those claiming to be independents are actually just conservatives/Republicans trying to sound more reasonable and level-headed than the rest of the GOP.Why do the Republicans allow independents to vote on who the party’s candidates will be? That’s stupid.
Lost of state parties allow this. Oklahoma Dems allow independents to vote in their primary. It gets independents interested in Democrats earlier in the process. It could also help pick less extreme candidates.Why do the Republicans allow independents to vote on who the party’s candidates will be? That’s stupid.
Just like Arkansas and other red states weakening child labor laws. Dems need to make this an issue.
![]()
Florida House passes bill weakening child labor laws and rejects sexual harassment amendment
The Florida House on Thursday advanced a bill allowing 16 and 17-year-olds to work more than 40 hours per week during the school year. | TAG24www.tag24.com
What is the sudden explosion of these type of bills by republicans? Is there a need for more lax child labor laws? Are businesses asking for more leeway? I just don’t understand the motivation behind them. It can’t be a political win for republicans, can it?
What is the sudden explosion of these type of bills by republicans? Is there a need for more lax child labor laws? Are businesses asking for more leeway? I just don’t understand the motivation behind them. It can’t be a political win for republicans, can it?
Culture wars employed in pursuit of increased corporate profits?
Just like Arkansas and other red states weakening child labor laws. Dems need to make this an issue.
![]()
Florida House passes bill weakening child labor laws and rejects sexual harassment amendment
The Florida House on Thursday advanced a bill allowing 16 and 17-year-olds to work more than 40 hours per week during the school year. | TAG24www.tag24.com
Don’t forget them there red states got them there blue states to give them all them there greenbacks to prop up the poors and them there leaders can scream about socialism while laughing at all the poors and dumb dumbs working for them as the elitesMore kids working means less in schools, then teachers get laid off due to fewer students which leads to schools closing...state saves money, population is dumber...win.
edit: forgot businesses save money by not giving full time benefits.
More kids working means less in schools, then teachers get laid off due to fewer students which leads to schools closing...state saves money, population is dumber...win.
edit: forgot businesses save money by not giving full time benefits.
Don’t forget them there red states got them there blue states to give them all them there greenbacks to prop up the poors and them there leaders can scream about socialism while laughing at all the poors and dumb dumbs working for them as the elites
I just got my primary ballot, seems here in WA I can vote for one candidate from one party, and they both have a write-in section. Haven't figured out what I'm going to do yet.Why do the Republicans allow independents to vote on who the party’s candidates will be? That’s stupid.
Yeah, I saw that Amazon has joined the companies arguing that the National Labor Board is unconstitutional, which kinda tells you everything you need to know.Another case will likely be before the court regarding federal labor bureau. Basically it’s a state responsibility and there should be no federal labor laws or worker protection or rights.
Billionaire propaganda induced Stockholm Syndrome.What is the sudden explosion of these type of bills by republicans? Is there a need for more lax child labor laws? Are businesses asking for more leeway? I just don’t understand the motivation behind them. It can’t be a political win for republicans, can it?
It's sad that these companies are trying to argue that the NLB is unconstitutional when that has already been answered in 1937, when it was ruled constitutional by the SCOTUS. Yeah, I know, we have a different SCOTUS today, who likes to change the rules and not rule based on set precidence and law, which is why these big corporations are hoping that ruling gets reversed. Every working person should be very concerned about what this SCOTUS may do, because if they rule in favor of these big corporations, it will be the beginning of the dismantling of worker's rights and protections, which will most lead to the end of Unions and the protections they offer.I just got my primary ballot, seems here in WA I can vote for one candidate from one party, and they both have a write-in section. Haven't figured out what I'm going to do yet.
It's alphabetical by last name, but it's still fun to see loser Donnie at the bottom of the Republican candidate list.
Yeah, I saw that Amazon has joined the companies arguing that the National Labor Board is unconstitutional, which kinda tells you everything you need to know.
It's sad that these companies are trying to argue that the NLB is unconstitutional when that has already been answered in 1937, when it was ruled constitutional by the SCOTUS. Yeah, I know, we have a different SCOTUS today, who likes to change the rules and not rule based on set precidence and law, which is why these big corporations are hoping that ruling gets reversed. Every working person should be very concerned about what this SCOTUS may do, because if they rule in favor of these big corporations, it will be the beginning of the dismantling of worker's rights and protections, which will most lead to the end of Unions and the protections they offer.
It's not rocket science and it doesn't take a conspiracy theory to see that the GOP would love to gut public education. GOP leadership is smart enough to look at the same voting demographics we all can look at.
On one side, college-educated women lead the way for voting (D).
On the other, non-college educated men lead the way for voting (R).
Solution, make more of the latter and try to discourage the former (as well as pesky minorities who might want to vote.) The abortion issue seems like an incredible own goal as far as riling up educated women, but there's a lot of bible-humping minorities so maybe they figure this'll even out or be a win. The GOP has always been better than Democrats at identifying and exploiting public ignorance.
Now, they still want lots of money for private schools because where else can the rich send their kids? And preferably Jesus-friendly ones.
Besides the knock on affects to education as described above don’t forget unemployment is at historic lows and wages are starting to grow. Immigrant labor is politically charged right now so adding a bunch of low cost kids to the labor force helps drive down labor costs as it increases the supply of labor.What is the sudden explosion of these type of bills by republicans? Is there a need for more lax child labor laws? Are businesses asking for more leeway? I just don’t understand the motivation behind them. It can’t be a political win for republicans, can it?
It's just an extension of what churches/religions due. They never wait until you have enough knowledge to think for yourself. Get'em young.You're missing the reality. They want private schools so they can indoctrinate children. That's why they pushed so hard to get the vouchers for charter schools, so they can then get people to start sending their kids to schools that don't have to actually follow any real accreditation and can literally preach to them. If they can help RWNJ profit off of it as well, all the better in their eyes.
You're seeing it in realtime as some right wingers are actually getting shit like PragerU added as acceptable education for some programs as well.
Which, there's other benefits for them as well. Its letting them effectively re-segregate schools.