"Fetish? Eh? Andromeda is just poor compared to the first three"

... may be some of it pure nostalgia.. ME1 (try to replay it now) , bad graphics, bad inventory system, very linear and very short. ME2 was good storytelling (ignore the terminator reaper at the end) with very good writing. ME3 - urghh. WTF?WTF? WTF? Since when galactic readiness belong in 'RPG'? the forced "which of your crew you want to die" choices (Tali/Legion,etc)? The ending? taking everything I fought against in ME1 and making that to be 'good ending', come again? I hated ME3 so to me MEA is ok, much longer and better than ME1, infinitely better than ME3, worse than ME2.
I think real problem is that whose you wanted RPGs don't actually have good choices now - RPG as a genre has very few options right now. no, stupid slasher may be action but calling it 'action-rpg' is hating the actual role playing. similarly fallout 4 become mediocre shooter +Sims , Bethesda simplified theirs into console action trash as well. thankfully there was still witcher series, there are newcomers like kingdom come deliverance , may be mount and blade again. Mass Effect was never an RPG and straying from it even further. no, having 100 guns to equip does not make something an RPG..