Marvel/Disney just lost Spider-Man to Sony (8/20/19)

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126
here's why:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dp0pXFUV2JY

Sony owns the rights to spiderman and had an arrangement with Disney.
sony gets 100% of box office receipts, and Disney gets the $ from toys.

ie: Spiderman: Far from home
$1B+ box office all went to Sony. Disney didn't see a dime

now Disney wants 50/50 and Sony walked away

no more Iron Spider (spiderman with Iron Man's tech).
no more Spiderman controlling deceased Tony Stark's orbital weapon platform
 
Last edited:

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,073
14,485
146
Wait...Spiderman is Marvel...Disney owns Marvel...how the hell did Sony manage to hold on to Spiderman?
 

whm1974

Diamond Member
Jul 24, 2016
9,436
1,569
126
Wait...Spiderman is Marvel...Disney owns Marvel...how the hell did Sony manage to hold on to Spiderman?
Yeah I was thinking that as well. I highly doubt that Marvel would anything at all to Sony let alone highly profitable IPs.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,467
10,061
136
Yeah I was thinking that as well. I highly doubt that Marvel would anything at all to Sony let alone highly profitable IPs.

Because long ago when Marvel was just Marvel Comics without the Studios and Disney was just making cartoons, nobody cared about signing over the movie rights in perpetuity.

As far as Phase 4 is concerned, I’d hope that Kevin Feige at least thinks of keeping Tom Holland on as Iron Spider (not “Spider Man”, Sony lawyers!) or hell, just let him become the new Iron Man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ken g6

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126
Wait...Spiderman is Marvel...Disney owns Marvel...how the hell did Sony manage to hold on to Spiderman?
same as how Fox owned fantastic Four and Xmen. (b4 Disney bought them out.)
a decade ago, marvel sold the movie rights to some of its characters to different entities.
 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126
As far as Phase 4 is concerned, I’d hope that Kevin Feige at least thinks of keeping Tom Holland on as Iron Spider (not “Spider Man”, Sony lawyers!) or hell, just let him become the new Iron Man.
heh.. disney would have to come up with one heck of an explanation to the movie viewer if Tom Holland became Iron Man yet aren't allowed to speak of Spider Man.

or speak in circles:
"What happened to your previous costume?"
"I upgraded from my previous suit. It was too clingy."
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,886
4,886
136
Disney definitely doesn't need more money, but Sony is definitely being greedy here. Half a box office gross to do jack shit other than sign off on it is a mind blowing deal. If "venom" and "amazing spiderman" are any indication, Marvel Studios should be handling Spider Man. Not Sony.
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,850
146
Disney definitely doesn't need more money, but Sony is definitely being greedy here. Half a box office gross to do jack shit other than sign off on it is a mind blowing deal. If "venom" and "amazing spiderman" are any indication, Marvel Studios should be handling Spider Man. Not Sony.

I agree they're being stupid, but Sony is calling Disney's bluff and holding out for more money because they know Marvel wants Spider-Man bad, especially now that they can really leverage the interconnection between their properties.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,886
4,886
136
If only Marvel hadn't sold the rights to Sony in perpetuity. Spidey belongs with Marvel. Sony just wants to milk him, screw the fans.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
Disney does not have absolute ownership over most of its IP's. they are required to do certain things with them or the rights go to somebody else.
And they dont own Star Wars outright. I think Lucasfilm has the rights to toys and junk.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,886
4,886
136
I don't think they have rights to the toys of "vintage" star wars characters. It's unfortunately the reason why they're aggressively killing the old cast off and making their own studio made characters center stage. Episode 7 was less a sequel and more a reboot of episode 4 with Disney branding. Star Wars the Experience is all Disney Star Wars content. Which is great if you prefer characters like Kylo over Vader and Ray over Luke. But I don't.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,739
31,104
146
Wait...Spiderman is Marvel...Disney owns Marvel...how the hell did Sony manage to hold on to Spiderman?

this goes back many years.

Marvel was essentially bankrupt in the early-mid nineties. They started selling off IP to movie studies for some licensing revenue: X-Men to Fox and Spider-man to Sony, which is where those first movies came into being. Fantastic Four to Warner Bros, I think. Some years later, Disney bought Marvel and, using what remained of their IP, Marvel decided to create their own studio division and make their own movies based on what remained of their IP that they controlled. They took a huge gamble and for their first movie, focused on some lame, generally unknown 2-bit character called Iron Man and hired a notoriously drunk and impossible-to-deal-with asshole called Robert Downey Jr to star....I think because they could get him cheap. ....then they did Captain America, and Thor. THey managed to wrestle Hulk back from (I forget who--Warner?) after those first 2 movies kinda sucked. The second was a reboot, but Hulk was reintroduced to Marvel with the first Avengers movie.

The X-Men are still fully owned by Fox, and most of those movies have really been shit.....but now Fox is owned by Disney, so this brings all of that back into Marvel, I think. Deadpool is part of the X-Men franchise, though, and those are pretty solid. But because X-Men and the concept of "mutants" are actually owned by Fox, Marvel can't used "mutants" in their flicks. So, characters like the Scarlet Witch (a mutant in the marvel universe) are called "enhanced" in the Marvel flicks...though I guess that might change with the Fox purchase. I think Marvel also re-acquired Fantastic Four, so maybe some decent movies will be made for that. I'm only interested in them getting Silver Surfer back.

Marvel regaining Spider-Man for the last 2 movies, at least story control, was a major coup for them. Sony had been respinning the franchise (those shitty Andrew Garfield movies, that shitty Spiderman 3) just to keep the license active, based on whatever first deal they had worked out. I guess this means that Sony is just going to make shit movies to sell toys and keep the license in their house. Spider-man is the biggest IP that Marvel has ever created. He's probably as popular as Superman in nearly as long as Spider-man existed. It's the character that essentially created Marvel Comics as envisioned by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby.

(fully-owned isn't correct: Marvel has always retained the rights to continue publishing their comic book material based on their characters. This is all just about film licensing).

Recently, Marvel has done some "hilarious" things in trying to re-acquire their IP. A few years ago, they actually killed the Fantastic Four (the series--I don't really know the story details, like if they were all actually killed. I have no idea). The idea, or at least according to internet comic book nerds, is that if they ended the original material, it would no longer hold any licensing value for an outside movie studio. I'm not sure how true that is, but it makes some kind of sense. Anyway, it "worked" or maybe something else entirely unrelated happened, (probably just Disney money--or that attempt to respin the series to retain licensing, like Sony did, with another shitty movie, just wasn't worth the sacrifice like with something that is actually valuable, such as Spider-man), because Marvel now has the FF to put back into their universe. I wish it had happened earlier, because Thanos/Infinity Gauntlet just isn't the same without Silver Surfer and that universe; then again Thanos would have to be back at his comic book level of power to match Silver Surfer, which would make all of the Avengers outside of Hulk and Thor (and Scarlet Witch) completely obsolete in that fight.
 
Last edited:

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,073
14,485
146
I vaguely remember some of the stuff with Sony/Marvel way back... ut didn't realize they had sold the rights to Sony forever. That was stoopid.
 
Last edited:

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,739
31,104
146
Sony bought the rights to Spiderman for $7 million back in '98. They were offered all the other IP, including The Avengers, for $25 million but didn't think anyone wanted to see movies with those characters.

D:

holy shit--had no idea the deal was that bad, lol. But yeah, Avengers characters were generally "garbage" in those days. X-Men Spider-Man and the related, the Space stuff, all were more interesting and had a larger fan base. ...even Daredevil was cooler than the Avengers.

They were so broke, though. Only chance of survival was to score some quick cash on licensing out their biggest properties. $7 million for Spider-man. ....that's unconscionable. :D $25 million for the rest. Spider-man alone is something close to $1 billion IP now, right?
 

BudAshes

Lifer
Jul 20, 2003
13,983
3,330
146
I think this stuff is replacing religion for Genx/Millennials. The bible is being replaced with comic books as the sacred texts of choice. That would make Disney the new catholic church.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,886
4,886
136
D:

holy shit--had no idea the deal was that bad, lol. But yeah, Avengers characters were generally "garbage" in those days. X-Men Spider-Man and the related, the Space stuff, all were more interesting and had a larger fan base. ...even Daredevil was cooler than the Avengers.

They were so broke, though. Only chance of survival was to score some quick cash on licensing out their biggest properties. $7 million for Spider-man. ....that's unconscionable. :D $25 million for the rest. Spider-man alone is something close to $1 billion IP now, right?
A ten year contract would have made more sense. Rights to Spidey FOREVER though?? For seven mil? Holy crap.
 

Skel

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,218
679
136
Disney does not have absolute ownership over most of its IP's. they are required to do certain things with them or the rights go to somebody else.
And they dont own Star Wars outright. I think Lucasfilm has the rights to toys and junk.

Disney owns Lucasfilms completely.

As for the thread, considering how badly MCU has handled the character, I don't really care if Sony takes him back. Can't do much worse with him
 

quikah

Diamond Member
Apr 7, 2003
4,189
738
126
Marvel also sold theme park license (only east of the Mississipi I think or something like that) to Universal in the '90s which is why there can not be any Marvel characters (or some subset of characters, GotG seems OK as they are building a GotG ride in Epcot) inside Disneyworld, but they can be in Disneyland.
 

Muadib

Lifer
May 30, 2000
18,120
911
126
I vaguely remember some of the stuff with Sony/Marvel way back... ut didn't realize they had sold the rights to Sony forever. That was stoopid.
Marvel was in serious trouble back in the 90's. There was almost no interest in their characters as far as movies, and the comic book biz was hanging on by a thread.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,739
31,104
146
hmmm, now I'm wondering if Marvel will try to kill all of Spider-man in the comic book universe like they did with FF. ...would be ballsy, of course, but Disney can force them to do it and it's the kind of ruthless thing Disney would do, the greedy rat bastards--now that Stan Lee is gone. Disney would probably enjoy dancing over his bones if it can another ~$billion to their already barely-fathomable revenue.
 

Skel

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,218
679
136
hmmm, now I'm wondering if Marvel will try to kill all of Spider-man in the comic book universe like they did with FF. ...would be ballsy, of course, but Disney can force them to do it and it's the kind of ruthless thing Disney would do, the greedy rat bastards--now that Stan Lee is gone. Disney would probably enjoy dancing over his bones if it can another ~$billion to their already barely-fathomable revenue.

Never say never, but I highly doubt that'll ever happen. Spider-Man is their crown jewel. At best they'll attempt to downplay him a bit, like they did the X-Men. However, like the X-Men, he's too big a following to get rid of. The FF struggled in sales regardless of the movies. It was easier to back burner the series for a bit (two of the characters never went away, nor did they move on from the group), but even then, people complained until they were brought back. I still think it was just a marketing ploy as the remaining characters were trying to find the rest of the group until the series was published again.
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,850
146
If only Marvel hadn't sold the rights to Sony in perpetuity. Spidey belongs with Marvel. Sony just wants to milk him, screw the fans.

That's begging for a James Franco "sooo good" with "Spider-milk" and Spidey shooting web in his mouth.

I don't think they have rights to the toys of "vintage" star wars characters. It's unfortunately the reason why they're aggressively killing the old cast off and making their own studio made characters center stage. Episode 7 was less a sequel and more a reboot of episode 4 with Disney branding. Star Wars the Experience is all Disney Star Wars content. Which is great if you prefer characters like Kylo over Vader and Ray over Luke. But I don't.

I don't know. Harrison Ford literally would only get involved if they killed off Han Solo (and I think that was known for some time, so it wasn't exactly a surprise when it happened - I think most people expected it would happen in like the 2nd movie, but I think most of them don't realize how much he fucking hates Star Wars fans). Carrie Fisher was the only one that seemed to want to be involved. Hamil openly criticized their direction with the characters and story. Fisher's gone, Hamil I think regrets his decision to be involved. Ford is happy because Disney's doing what he wants (killed him off ASAP, is minimizing the original movies).

They needed to move on. They never should've had the original people in the new movies to begin with. They should've had cameos and easter eggs with stuff from the original movies to celebrate them but focused on all new stuff.

D:

holy shit--had no idea the deal was that bad, lol. But yeah, Avengers characters were generally "garbage" in those days. X-Men Spider-Man and the related, the Space stuff, all were more interesting and had a larger fan base. ...even Daredevil was cooler than the Avengers.

They were so broke, though. Only chance of survival was to score some quick cash on licensing out their biggest properties. $7 million for Spider-man. ....that's unconscionable. :D $25 million for the rest. Spider-man alone is something close to $1 billion IP now, right?

I wouldn't say garbage (were definitely in a down period, especially compared to X-Men).

Yeah Marvel was very close to going under. The thing is, without having done that stuff, Marvel likely doesn't make it back. The X-Men and then Spider-Man movies revived superheroes and made them workable in the modern world. Without that Marvel would probably still be pretty weak, as those paved the way for the comics to hit mainstream appeal and go beyond comics.

Spider-Man is worth more than that. Disney could probably make a billion from just 1-2 Spider-Man movie these days (plus the carry over into other franchises). If I were Sony I'd offer to sell Spider-Man back for $10billion. Sony isn't likely to make that from the franchise anytime soon, but Marvel could in probably a decade. I'm sure Marvel would balk and Disney just want to wait Sony out, but I bet they'd go for more than $5billion.

Marvel was in serious trouble back in the 90's. There was almost no interest in their characters as far as movies, and the comic book biz was hanging on by a thread.

Yeah people don't seem to remember. Comic movies were nowhere close to being the surefire money printers they are today. The Batman movies were on a downward trend and I think basically all other superhero/comic franchises were bombing at the box office. And the comics themselves weren't doing super well.

hmmm, now I'm wondering if Marvel will try to kill all of Spider-man in the comic book universe like they did with FF. ...would be ballsy, of course, but Disney can force them to do it and it's the kind of ruthless thing Disney would do, the greedy rat bastards--now that Stan Lee is gone. Disney would probably enjoy dancing over his bones if it can another ~$billion to their already barely-fathomable revenue.

I don't think they can. Sony likely owns the right to use Spider-Man and a bunch of already established Spider-Man stories. Marvel could kill him off in the comics but that doesn't even matter with regards to the movies. There's a LOT of other Spider-Man stuff they could still work with. Seriously, we haven't even had a good version of Venom yet (honestly, we haven't had great versions of most of the Spidey villains although I doubt they'd top Green Goblin, Doc Oc, and Vulture; I didn't hear good things about Rhino or Shocker and I haven't seen the newest Spidey movie which I think has Mysterio in it? Sand Man was ok but got lost in the mess that was Spider-Man 3), and a Venom and then Carnage saga could add some edge to the franchise. Which, granted Sony would probably screw it up, and Disney seems like they'd rather keep Spidey appealing to younger audiences. But that's some potential bank to be made there. I figure Sony is gonna probably try that route at least before giving up on the franchise.

Never say never, but I highly doubt that'll ever happen. Spider-Man is their crown jewel. At best they'll attempt to downplay him a bit, like they did the X-Men. However, like the X-Men, he's too big a following to get rid of. The FF struggled in sales regardless of the movies. It was easier to back burner the series for a bit (two of the characters never went away, nor did they move on from the group), but even then, people complained until they were brought back. I still think it was just a marketing ploy as the remaining characters were trying to find the rest of the group until the series was published again.

Yeah. Spider-Man is more popular than even X-Men these days. Without RDJ, I bet Iron-Man falls off big time in popularity. That leaves basically Thor and maybe Black Panther in the top tier of characters for now. Thor will be part of Guardians (and GotG is likely their best franchise by far now).

Spider-Man is worth a lot more to Marvel than to Sony I think. And that's why if I were Sony I'd try and just sell it back for some crazy amount just to see what Marvel says. People might would compare what Marvel makes and say Sony was stupid, but I doubt Sony would be able to make the same amount from it, so its a situation where both could benefit. Sony gets a bigger sum than they'd probably make from it for decades, and Marvel gets to properly re-integrate Spider-Man which will be very lucrative.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,739
31,104
146
That's begging for a James Franco "sooo good" with "Spider-milk" and Spidey shooting web in his mouth.



I don't know. Harrison Ford literally would only get involved if they killed off Han Solo (and I think that was known for some time, so it wasn't exactly a surprise when it happened - I think most people expected it would happen in like the 2nd movie, but I think most of them don't realize how much he fucking hates Star Wars fans). Carrie Fisher was the only one that seemed to want to be involved. Hamil openly criticized their direction with the characters and story. Fisher's gone, Hamil I think regrets his decision to be involved. Ford is happy because Disney's doing what he wants (killed him off ASAP, is minimizing the original movies).

They needed to move on. They never should've had the original people in the new movies to begin with. They should've had cameos and easter eggs with stuff from the original movies to celebrate them but focused on all new stuff.



I wouldn't say garbage (were definitely in a down period, especially compared to X-Men).

Yeah Marvel was very close to going under. The thing is, without having done that stuff, Marvel likely doesn't make it back. The X-Men and then Spider-Man movies revived superheroes and made them workable in the modern world. Without that Marvel would probably still be pretty weak, as those paved the way for the comics to hit mainstream appeal and go beyond comics.

Spider-Man is worth more than that. Disney could probably make a billion from just 1-2 Spider-Man movie these days (plus the carry over into other franchises). If I were Sony I'd offer to sell Spider-Man back for $10billion. Sony isn't likely to make that from the franchise anytime soon, but Marvel could in probably a decade. I'm sure Marvel would balk and Disney just want to wait Sony out, but I bet they'd go for more than $5billion.



Yeah people don't seem to remember. Comic movies were nowhere close to being the surefire money printers they are today. The Batman movies were on a downward trend and I think basically all other superhero/comic franchises were bombing at the box office. And the comics themselves weren't doing super well.



I don't think they can. Sony likely owns the right to use Spider-Man and a bunch of already established Spider-Man stories. Marvel could kill him off in the comics but that doesn't even matter with regards to the movies. There's a LOT of other Spider-Man stuff they could still work with. Seriously, we haven't even had a good version of Venom yet (honestly, we haven't had great versions of most of the Spidey villains although I doubt they'd top Green Goblin, Doc Oc, and Vulture; I didn't hear good things about Rhino or Shocker and I haven't seen the newest Spidey movie which I think has Mysterio in it? Sand Man was ok but got lost in the mess that was Spider-Man 3), and a Venom and then Carnage saga could add some edge to the franchise. Which, granted Sony would probably screw it up, and Disney seems like they'd rather keep Spidey appealing to younger audiences. But that's some potential bank to be made there. I figure Sony is gonna probably try that route at least before giving up on the franchise.



Yeah. Spider-Man is more popular than even X-Men these days. Without RDJ, I bet Iron-Man falls off big time in popularity. That leaves basically Thor and maybe Black Panther in the top tier of characters for now. Thor will be part of Guardians (and GotG is likely their best franchise by far now).

Spider-Man is worth a lot more to Marvel than to Sony I think. And that's why if I were Sony I'd try and just sell it back for some crazy amount just to see what Marvel says. People might would compare what Marvel makes and say Sony was stupid, but I doubt Sony would be able to make the same amount from it, so its a situation where both could benefit. Sony gets a bigger sum than they'd probably make from it for decades, and Marvel gets to properly re-integrate Spider-Man which will be very lucrative.

They spun the Star Wars/Lucasfilm purchase of $4 billion into about 10 billion within 5 years. (my one billion for Spidey was annual value).

Anyway...man, yeah. They really chucked Venom. It's god damn pathetic. I actually thought Sandman with Loel from Wings was pretty awesome as Sandman, and a great treatment of that character....the rest of Spidey 3 was dogshit. ...I like Kirsten Dunts in some things, but not as Mary Jane. ...I still love Spidey 2 and Spidey 1--I honestly put those up there as the best of Superhero flicks, next to XMen 2...and none of those were Marvel (I don't think any of these have done a better villain than Willem Defoe as Green Goblin). So there is hope, but those were the early days and they no longer need to risk anything with that content, does Sony. Just "make Spidey" and it prints money.

Vulture was great because Micheal Keaton, also that was Marvel and it's in their wheelhouse, tied into the rest of the established MCU.

X-Men has turned to shit because those last 2 movies are just...bad and because Spidey, many things he is good at, is appealing to kids, way more than something like X-Men. My nephew has been a Spidey freak for many years now, and I get it. I got it then, so why not. Yes, Iron Man is basically done. I mean, they killed it in the film franchise, so whatever I guess. Thor changed a lot with Ragnarock. That movie reminded me of Guardians, basically a clone of that because it is the "happiest" franchise of the bunch. It's just goddamn charming. And here we go--now Thor is a Guardian. That makes sense, and at least for this transition, without Spidey, Guardians--and I guess Black Panther--are going to be the anchors of the franchise.

The newest Spidey was actually pretty well-done. ....if you know Mysterio, then you know the uh...obvious twist of this flick. It's kinda weird overall, but the entire premise is that they are transitioning the MCU into Spideyland to replace Iron Man. ....so, lol about this deal.