Skel
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2001
- 6,226
- 686
- 136
That wasn't his point. The point is authenticity. If a character is white, leave them white. If a character is black, asian, indian, etc.... LEAVE IT ALONE. By fiddling with it, you mess with the structure of the character. It seems like the big thing is to screw with things that were fine the way they were. Movies and comics just can't seem to do new stories or characters. They just have to change fundamental things about existing ones. It's pretty crazy how much money they'll waste to try to earn more....
It's mostly about ego and getting a producer credit. I've seen first hand how many movie makers get an IP from a comic or what not and look to see what they can change before figuring out hte story. That way they get to have "their" version of the character and many times get a producer credit which means more money. I'm old school as when I learned to make comics it was drilled into me that we're just caretakers of the IPs. We don't own them, nor should we do anything that someone else can't recover from. It's not the best approach in all comics, but it works for long standing IPs.
You're missing the point as well. Is this a life altering problem? Of course not. However, it's annoying to see things that you associate with your childhood changed......for no other reason than just because they can. I realize that they skip and change things and kill and restore constantly. However, the killing and restoring generally affects the SAME character, not one that they've decided to change race/gender on. I know the times are hard on the comic business and most of the money now comes from movies and merchandising but still.......leave the characters and their origins alone.
Movies and merchandising does little for comics as a business. It's been shown quite a few times that just because you have a successful movie/TV/Whatever doesn't mean you'll get a new reader. With the exceptions of parent companies like Disney or WB who'll make money regardless of the medium it's in, comics don't have anything to do with the other outlets. While most comics start to morph into the popular versions, that's mostly because their creators/editors liked that version and want to start working with them. I've never head of a corporate mandate to change a comic to align with something else. I remember quite a few from Marvel before Disney bought them back in the 2000s when you had a couple of huge hits with Spider-Man and X-Men yet the comics weren't doing anything to even try to get new readers. If the comics are getting changed, its normally because some creator/editor wants to do "their" version of them.
True, but that was part of the larger problem - it wasn't like they'd hire black people to make them, and it wasn't like there was any interest in the black market (or others).
It might be better to have 'spinoff' lines though with the new versions of the heroes - not like they haven't done that. Can't please everyone.
I guess it's a little like the history of advertising - where mainstream things would be white people, and if there were minorities, it wasn't especially flattering (e.g., Aunt Jemima).
I'm guessing it is mostly a money grab in the face of declining sales and demographic shifts.
The big two have tried a few times to have spin off worlds. They rarely do well long term. The reason long running titles like Batman and Spider-Man do so well is normally a combo of good writing and mostly a long history. Those people that continue to read are still scratching that same itch they had when they were kids.
Marvel also is creating new IPs. Ms. Marvel is a new IP that is doing well. She's now a Muslim Pakistani girl with morphing powers. The title is an old one, but that character went on to a new title (Captain Marvel) and is also still selling. It's not all redos
