+1 China is an enemy of the United States, no doubt about it. They're arming themselves for an eventual conflict with America.
Tell us, oh farm animal who learned to use a computer, what that war will look like?
Will they simply launch a nuclear barrage at us, and receive one in return?
Now, that's a very plausible scenario of what they will think is in their interest.
Or maybe they'll build 10 million boats, and send a massive army across the Mexican border and take us over that way.
No, clueless, let's try another scenario.
The fact is, in our current world political system, might still makes money, if not right. Nations who can't defend themselves face problems. The US is no strangers, with its CIA operations for 60 years among other things, to arranging for its own interests, and if that means putting nations under tyranny, well, no problem.
China understands that as its economy surpasses that of the United States, and it wants to expand its own power and influence in Asia which will diminish that of the US, there will be conflicts. The US is facing deteriorating power in many areas - the one it still has a huge advantage is military power. This will create pressure on the US to use it more.
Wouldn't it make sense for China to be able to not be vulnerable? Would you like to trade places with them on military power?
If the US slashed its military spending, and the #2 military nation in the world doubled theirs, the US would still be spending $115 billion more.
Just maybe it makes a whole lot of sense for China to be prepared - and that doesn't mean 'they are preparing for starting a war with us'?
How warped are you to think the US can spend as much as the rest of the world combined on the military, the #1 arms supplier in the world, and that anyone who builds their own military in response to that is the 'aggressor who is preparing for war with us'? So our being completely dominant - why not say the rest of the world has to be disarmed - is the only 'fair' distribution of military power?
An effort was made after WWII to do SOMETHING about this, with the creation of the United Nations, its charter prohibiting nuclear war.
A charter last seen rolled next to the toilet in the Bush White House.
This is why we need not only 'peace studies', but politicians who will work for world peace, not only women in beauty pageants.
JFK, Jimmy Carter made some progress - but that's still the situation. It's a very armed world, and you need to get used to it until it's changed.
Calling anyone who arms in response to our massive military a warmonger doesn't help.