Just an observation, but I've noticed that mainly the people who have negative things to say about a game are always the ones to post outside of the big, attention-grabbing **OFFICIAL** game posts like "**OFFICIAL** Super Mario Galaxy Thread". Wonder why?
Originally posted by: CKDragon
Just an observation, but I've noticed that mainly the people who have negative things to say about a game are always the ones to post outside of the big, attention-grabbing **OFFICIAL** game posts like "**OFFICIAL** Super Mario Galaxy Thread". Wonder why?
Originally posted by: Trader05
Just an observation, but I've noticed that mainly the people who have negative things to say about a game are always the ones to post outside of the big, attention-grabbing **OFFICIAL** game posts like "**OFFICIAL** Super Mario Galaxy Thread". Wonder why?
Sorry im just wondering if anyone wasn't too impressed by it...obviously everyone in that thread likes it.
Originally posted by: Trader05
It seems very kiddish to me and plays a lot like Mario64..of which i didn't like. Anyone else not up for the Mario hype?
Originally posted by: Modeps
I have a feeling that Galaxy is a type of game where if you don't like it, you just don't WANT to like it. Like I've told people before, I regretted buying my Wii before I played Galaxy. Zelda and Metroid were good, but there was something that just didn't fit... Galaxy feels like it should, plays like it should, and I don't miss a normal controller when I'm playing it.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: CKDragon
Just an observation, but I've noticed that mainly the people who have negative things to say about a game are always the ones to post outside of the big, attention-grabbing **OFFICIAL** game posts like "**OFFICIAL** Super Mario Galaxy Thread". Wonder why?
Just an observation, but I've noticed that people who are younger than me tend to throw the word "of" into sentences before the word "which" when it doesn't belong, and people who are younger than me also tend to not like games because they're too "kiddish." Coincidence?
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: CKDragon
Just an observation, but I've noticed that mainly the people who have negative things to say about a game are always the ones to post outside of the big, attention-grabbing **OFFICIAL** game posts like "**OFFICIAL** Super Mario Galaxy Thread". Wonder why?
Just an observation, but I've noticed that people who are younger than me tend to throw the word "of" into sentences before the word "which" when it doesn't belong, and people who are younger than me also tend to not like games because they're too "kiddish." Coincidence?
Agreed. It's really ironic that kids are usually the ones that dislike games for their "kiddish" qualities.
Originally posted by: randay
oh one thing that i find completely unacceptable is the lack of voice acting. i mean is the wii just incapable? do they not have enough space on the disk? i can't stand it and its a total deal killer for me.
Originally posted by: Trader05
It seems very kiddish to me and plays a lot like Mario64..of which i didn't like. Anyone else not up for the Mario hype?
Originally posted by: TecHNooB
Originally posted by: Trader05
It seems very kiddish to me and plays a lot like Mario64..of which i didn't like. Anyone else not up for the Mario hype?
That's pretty much saying its an awesome game.
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
Kids are the ones buying "Bloodfest X" on the PS3 and bragging about billions of pixels of blood and titties on the screen every second. Mature gamers like myself have fun with Mario Galaxy.
Originally posted by: Modeps
I have a feeling that Galaxy is a type of game where if you don't like it, you just don't WANT to like it. Like I've told people before, I regretted buying my Wii before I played Galaxy. Zelda and Metroid were good, but there was something that just didn't fit... Galaxy feels like it should, plays like it should, and I don't miss a normal controller when I'm playing it.
