berzerker60
Golden Member
- Jul 18, 2012
- 1,233
- 1
- 0
IMO Drugs should not be considered as recreation in the first place. If it is you are already screwed up.
Beep beep boop boop I am a robot
IMO Drugs should not be considered as recreation in the first place. If it is you are already screwed up.
IMO Drugs should not be considered as recreation in the first place. If it is you are already screwed up.
I have an honest question. What about the increased strain on a healthcare system that Americans are now forced to pay for? I don't know which side is the most accurate on the safe/dangerous attribute of mj, I feel both sides are agenda-coloured and only have anecdotal evidence. I do think that the 'all drugs should be legal' argument simply can't hold water in a health care system that can't deny coverage AND forces people to pay for it. This is really my only problem as of now.
Secondly, are there any studies that test actual tobacco instead of the processed poisons we have in chew and cigarettes?
MJ won't kill you immediately, sure, but the smoke itself isn't good for lungs. There haven't been a lot of large, definitive studies but common sense would tell you that we weren't evolved to breathe in smoke. http://adai.uw.edu/marijuana/factsheets/respiratoryeffects.htm
I am in no way defending tobacco or alcohol. I'm just saying MJ isn't risk-free, that's all.
I would suspect alcohol is exponentially more dangerous then weed.
The problem with weed is that you are never sure what you are getting...it could be laced with PCP, it could be a synthetic K2 variant, it could be a noxious plant.
Regular, old school weed, is fairly mundane.
I would suspect alcohol is exponentially more dangerous then weed.
The problem with weed is that you are never sure what you are getting...it could be laced with PCP, it could be a synthetic K2 variant, it could be a noxious plant.
Regular, old school weed, is fairly mundane.
I have an honest question. What about the increased strain on a healthcare system that Americans are now forced to pay for? I don't know which side is the most accurate on the safe/dangerous attribute of mj, I feel both sides are agenda-coloured and only have anecdotal evidence. I do think that the 'all drugs should be legal' argument simply can't hold water in a health care system that can't deny coverage AND forces people to pay for it. This is really my only problem as of now.
Secondly, are there any studies that test actual tobacco instead of the processed poisons we have in chew and cigarettes?
The problem with weed is that you are never sure what you are getting...it could be laced with PCP, it could be a synthetic K2 variant, it could be a noxious plant. Regular, old school weed, is fairly mundane.
I would suspect alcohol is exponentially more dangerous then weed.
The problem with weed is that you are never sure what you are getting...it could be laced with PCP, it could be a synthetic K2 variant, it could be a noxious plant.
Regular, old school weed, is fairly mundane.
I would suspect alcohol is exponentially more dangerous then weed.
The problem with weed is that you are never sure what you are getting...it could be laced with PCP, it could be a synthetic K2 variant, it could be a noxious plant.
Regular, old school weed, is fairly mundane.
you realize that's what happened when people did a lot of moonshining...and that's one of the reasons WHY alcohol became regulated? because if you don't control your reactions carefully, you created methanol (vs ethanol), which is incredibly damaging and potentially lethal.
I would suspect alcohol is exponentially more dangerous then weed.
The problem with weed is that you are never sure what you are getting...it could be laced with PCP, it could be a synthetic K2 variant, it could be a noxious plant.
Regular, old school weed, is fairly mundane.
I would suspect alcohol is exponentially more dangerous then weed.
The problem with weed is that you are never sure what you are getting...it could be laced with PCP, it could be a synthetic K2 variant, it could be a noxious plant.
Regular, old school weed, is fairly mundane.
There are undoubtedly negatives associated with legalizing MJ. But those have to be weighed against the benefits. I believe any honest accounting of gains versus losses of MJ legalization will show a huge overall gain.I have an honest question. What about the increased strain on a healthcare system that Americans are now forced to pay for? I don't know which side is the most accurate on the safe/dangerous attribute of mj, I feel both sides are agenda-coloured and only have anecdotal evidence. I do think that the 'all drugs should be legal' argument simply can't hold water in a health care system that can't deny coverage AND forces people to pay for it. This is really my only problem as of now.
Secondly, are there any studies that test actual tobacco instead of the processed poisons we have in chew and cigarettes?
Exactly. And you should only have sex one time per child. People who do things out of some sense of self gratification are screwed up.
Why exactly?
Not being able to get over yourself is far more screwed up.
Humans have an affinity for mind altering drugs. It's been that way since before the dawn of history. It's in society's interest to direct that affinity towards the least damaging substances available, cannabis among them.
You should know more than anyone. Regardless of what you think my opinion doesn't have to meet with your approval. Or anyone else's.
A good way to think when you happen to have any old absurd opinion that comes along.
Because it screws you up mentally. Every stoner I have ever known eventually ended up being a waste of flesh with the mental capacity of a worm.
You should know more than anyone. Regardless of what you think my opinion doesn't have to meet with your approval. Or anyone else's.