• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Mandatory anger management program before you can buy ammunition

I say we apply this rule to the First Amendment, then force it upon the Second Amendment after seeing how well it works on the First Amendment.
 
Haha how about voting? All the anger in the last few election election cycles says we should require a class before elections.

Back to being serious. What is wrong with these people they think anybody who owns a gun has anger issues? I suspect this lady is projecting. She the one who needs anger management classes.
 
Genx87 said:
Back to being serious. What is wrong with these people they think anybody who owns a gun has anger issues? I suspect this lady is projecting. She the one who needs anger management classes.
Click to expand...
Crazy people be crazy, and I agree with you.
-daddy owned a gun
-daddy raped me repeatedly
-all gun owners must be rapists like daddy
-all men must be rapists like daddy
-be a total whore to get attention from men because sex is what daddy wanted

Bitch be crazy, yo.
 
She's an absolute nutcase obviously, but it is interesting that you're starting to see the true colors of the democrats finally become more plain for everyone to see.
 
What's wrong with this? Don't want to take the class don't buy ammunition. Its completely up to you. It's just like the trans vaginal ultrasound before abortion.


Or maybe dumb ass politicians should stop trying to legislate hurdles to behaviors that are legal but they don't like.
 
After reading that I think I need anger management. Makes you wonder whats next? Will you need to do 20 jumping jacks before you can buy a soda?
 
Pretty much every shooting, the people in the news are in a daze of confusion, no one would have ever expected him.

In other words, this bill will do nothing but divide this country further apart.
 
KB said:
After reading that I think I need anger management. Makes you wonder whats next? Will you need to do 20 jumping jacks before you can buy a soda?
Click to expand...

Would be a hell of a start to solve the obesity epidemic of this nation! Honestly, this law is another of those heart in right place but mind isn't. It would nice to ensure that anyone who is going to be armed doesn't have rage issues. But the law is simply too invasive.

Maybe we can institute a simple questionnaire before someone is allowed to purchase guns or ammo to determine their sanity level.

If you answer "yes" to any of the below, you're disqualified.

Do you believe George W. Bush had foreknowledge of 9/11 and that his administration covered it up?
Do you think Barack Obama was not born in the US?
Do you take cable news seriously?
Do you think Donald Trump is anything but a blowhard jackass?

I think that's a good start for filtering out the crazy from gun ownership at least.
 
Anger management huh? Interesting...you see the day two POS broke into my home and I caught them in my home you better believe I had a serious case of anger. I was angry enough to kill their skank asses right then and there if they hesitated one millisecond to comply with my orders. Was I armed? Yes I was. Had they failed to obey my orders immediately I would have put a minimum of two .45 rounds in each of them. They complied with my orders and I dialed 911 once they were subdued at gun point. While extremely angered at the two POS I had no intention to kill them as long as they complied. Do I need anger management classes? No I do not. What I need is for that dumbass bitch to have to deal with a couple of POS breaking into her home and see if she gets angry about it. The woman is a fucking idiot.
 
Paratus said:
What's wrong with this? Don't want to take the class don't buy ammunition. Its completely up to you. It's just like the trans vaginal ultrasound before abortion. .
Click to expand...

I think you should have to take an anger management class before you are allowed to enjoy the first amendment.

Until you have taken that class, you are to be forced to worship Obama 6 hours a day, since you do not have the freedom of religion.
 
People who go to Anger Managment still can lose their cool, just like AA goer's can still fall for a drink. I see this yielding no difference in gun violence at all.
 
HeXen said:
People who go to Anger Managment still can lose their cool, just like AA goer's can still fall for a drink. I see this yielding no difference in gun violence at all.
Click to expand...

It was never about reducing gun violence and only every about control of the populace.
 
wirednuts said:
the 2nd amendment only applies to people in a militia.
Click to expand...


The founding fathers believed that each citizen was a part of the militia therefore the second amendmant apllies to each and every legal US citizen. The bottom line is each legal US citizen can own and bare arms if they so choose to do so. The second amendment states that no government entity can impose laws which infringe upon that right....period. The founding father realized that the citizen was the first line of defense both for the individual, the community and the nation. In addition the founding fathers realized a well armed populace was the last resort to dealing with a government running amok. The second amendment applies to each and every legal US citizen as a right not a priveldge nor an entitlement...it is a right acknowledged by the US Constitution. You are a fool on a fools errand.
 
KB said:
After reading that I think I need anger management. Makes you wonder whats next? Will you need to do 20 jumping jacks before you can buy a soda?
Click to expand...


If gun owners are restricted to say seven rounds then I demand no more than seven jumping jacks be required.
 
wirednuts said:
the 2nd amendment only applies to people in a militia.
Click to expand...

The people who wrote the Constitution also said that there would be no intention of the government to remove the individual right of gun ownership. If you want to try to argue that intent isn't legally binding I'd remind you that the principle of separation of church and state has less constitutional standing than the second, yet it is based entirely on extra-constitutional documentation.

Want to make that trade?
 
Chuck_v said:
If gun owners are restricted to say seven rounds then I demand no more than seven jumping jacks be required.
Click to expand...

We are restricted to that in NY, effectively making a majority of firearms illegal. It was done in a way that allowed only about 20 minutes of debate and prevented normal public input via hearings. Our legislature is quite proud of that.
 
This would violate our second amendment right. Having said that this bill won't pass and proves once again our politicians do not know the oath they took when taking office.
 
PC Surgeon said:
This would violate our second amendment right. Having said that this bill won't pass and proves once again our politicians do not know the oath they took when taking office.
Click to expand...

When does that old piece of paper matter?

They've jumped the shark over this whole issue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top