Originally posted by: techs
Bittok chose to receive his winnings in 25 annual payments of about $52,920 after taxes
Foreigner mistake.
I know why I'd want the lump sum (pretty much greed), but why would taking the annual payments be a mistake ? Is it because of inflation ?Originally posted by: techs
Bittok chose to receive his winnings in 25 annual payments of about $52,920 after taxes
Foreigner mistake.
Originally posted by: rh71
I know why I'd want the lump sum (pretty much greed), but why would taking the annual payments be a mistake ? Is it because of inflation ?Originally posted by: techs
Bittok chose to receive his winnings in 25 annual payments of about $52,920 after taxes
Foreigner mistake.
Originally posted by: Shadowknight
In Soviet Russia, lottery wins you.
is that way ahead of just the annual payments (well yes that's true) or way ahead of lump sum pre-tax ?Originally posted by: mchammer187
Originally posted by: rh71
I know why I'd want the lump sum (pretty much greed), but why would taking the annual payments be a mistake ? Is it because of inflation ?Originally posted by: techs
Bittok chose to receive his winnings in 25 annual payments of about $52,920 after taxes
Foreigner mistake.
because if you take the lump sum and invest it you are going to end up way ahead
even at a 4% return which you can get anywhere with zero risk
Originally posted by: rh71
is that way ahead of just the annual payments (well yes that's true) or way ahead of lump sum pre-tax ?Originally posted by: mchammer187
Originally posted by: rh71
I know why I'd want the lump sum (pretty much greed), but why would taking the annual payments be a mistake ? Is it because of inflation ?Originally posted by: techs
Bittok chose to receive his winnings in 25 annual payments of about $52,920 after taxes
Foreigner mistake.
because if you take the lump sum and invest it you are going to end up way ahead
even at a 4% return which you can get anywhere with zero risk
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Who's stupid for wasting money on lottery tickets now?
Originally posted by: mchammer187
Originally posted by: rh71
is that way ahead of just the annual payments (well yes that's true) or way ahead of lump sum pre-tax ?Originally posted by: mchammer187
Originally posted by: rh71
I know why I'd want the lump sum (pretty much greed), but why would taking the annual payments be a mistake ? Is it because of inflation ?Originally posted by: techs
Bittok chose to receive his winnings in 25 annual payments of about $52,920 after taxes
Foreigner mistake.
because if you take the lump sum and invest it you are going to end up way ahead
even at a 4% return which you can get anywhere with zero risk
way ahead of annual payments
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: Shadowknight
In Soviet Russia, lottery wins you.
WWYBYWB?
Originally posted by: Crono
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Who's stupid for wasting money on lottery tickets now?
Everyone who didn't win.
Nope, good sound logic to take the annual payments. A large percentage of lottery winners go bankrupt later in life. Why? Since they overspend, get hooked on the spending, and cannot stop. It is just human nature. This way he will have money for life and never have any worries. He can't overspend since he doesn't have it. He can't be hit up by friends/relatives begging for cash since he doesn't have it. Plus tax on $50k a year is 15% for a married couple, far less than the 35% tax rate on $1.89 million in one year.Originally posted by: techs
Bittok chose to receive his winnings in 25 annual payments of about $52,920 after taxes
Foreigner mistake.