• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Man wins lottery on the day he becomes US citizen

Bittok chose to receive his winnings in 25 annual payments of about $52,920 after taxes

Foreigner mistake.
 
Originally posted by: techs
Bittok chose to receive his winnings in 25 annual payments of about $52,920 after taxes

Foreigner mistake.

more like his choice is still from a foreign perspective.
 
Originally posted by: techs
Bittok chose to receive his winnings in 25 annual payments of about $52,920 after taxes

Foreigner mistake.
I know why I'd want the lump sum (pretty much greed), but why would taking the annual payments be a mistake ? Is it because of inflation ?
 
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: techs
Bittok chose to receive his winnings in 25 annual payments of about $52,920 after taxes

Foreigner mistake.
I know why I'd want the lump sum (pretty much greed), but why would taking the annual payments be a mistake ? Is it because of inflation ?

because if you take the lump sum and invest it you are going to end up way ahead

even at a 4% return which you can get anywhere with zero risk
 
Originally posted by: mchammer187
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: techs
Bittok chose to receive his winnings in 25 annual payments of about $52,920 after taxes

Foreigner mistake.
I know why I'd want the lump sum (pretty much greed), but why would taking the annual payments be a mistake ? Is it because of inflation ?

because if you take the lump sum and invest it you are going to end up way ahead

even at a 4% return which you can get anywhere with zero risk
is that way ahead of just the annual payments (well yes that's true) or way ahead of lump sum pre-tax ?
 
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: mchammer187
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: techs
Bittok chose to receive his winnings in 25 annual payments of about $52,920 after taxes

Foreigner mistake.
I know why I'd want the lump sum (pretty much greed), but why would taking the annual payments be a mistake ? Is it because of inflation ?

because if you take the lump sum and invest it you are going to end up way ahead

even at a 4% return which you can get anywhere with zero risk
is that way ahead of just the annual payments (well yes that's true) or way ahead of lump sum pre-tax ?

way ahead of annual payments
 
Originally posted by: mchammer187
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: mchammer187
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: techs
Bittok chose to receive his winnings in 25 annual payments of about $52,920 after taxes

Foreigner mistake.
I know why I'd want the lump sum (pretty much greed), but why would taking the annual payments be a mistake ? Is it because of inflation ?

because if you take the lump sum and invest it you are going to end up way ahead

even at a 4% return which you can get anywhere with zero risk
is that way ahead of just the annual payments (well yes that's true) or way ahead of lump sum pre-tax ?

way ahead of annual payments


Yes you can make more by takeing the lump sum. BUT in this case, he did the right thing. It keeps the money out of his hands (and wifes) and if any distant relatives come forward, well to bad. he also is probable not to smart in money so the lump sum would be gone in no time and he be another lottery joke/story.

 
Considering I have a better chance of getting hit by lightning 3 times than winning the lottery, I'm not going to waste much money on it.
 
Originally posted by: techs
Bittok chose to receive his winnings in 25 annual payments of about $52,920 after taxes

Foreigner mistake.
Nope, good sound logic to take the annual payments. A large percentage of lottery winners go bankrupt later in life. Why? Since they overspend, get hooked on the spending, and cannot stop. It is just human nature. This way he will have money for life and never have any worries. He can't overspend since he doesn't have it. He can't be hit up by friends/relatives begging for cash since he doesn't have it. Plus tax on $50k a year is 15% for a married couple, far less than the 35% tax rate on $1.89 million in one year.

In an ideal world, it may have been better to get the lump sum. But not in the real world (for most people).
 
ouch, 25 x 52,920 = 1,323,000

So while he won 1.89 mil he has $567,000 in taxes? Does that seem a little high or insane to anyone else? That looks frikkin crazy!
 
Back
Top