Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: pinion9
Originally posted by: Looney
As for in the US, he probably shouldn't... because i don't think the US systems normally covers this. He shouldn't receive preferential treatment just because this made headlines.
You bring up a good point. If he were not in prison, he would have to pay for the operation. No insurance company would pay for it. So why should he get special surgery, covered by tax payer dollars, when he is in prison? To me, the prisoner is getting more rights than those that are free.
Aidanjm, why should a prisoner receive an operation in prison that he never would have gotten for free otherwise? Why should he receive special rights in prison?
I have to wonder about that also.
I guess the theory (which I do not subscribe to) is that society has denied him the chance to save up money and pay for the operation himself by imprisoning him. It seems to me HE is the one who made that choice by killing his wife, but apparently there are those who think that society owes prisoners MORE than they would have if they hadn't committed awful crimes. I find the whole thing just ridiculous.
It seems that way to me also. I remember a long time ago a convicted murderer sued some state prison for refusing him conjugal visits. He claimed they were denying him the right to reproduce. LOL, he was a convicted murderer, he forfieted his rights AFAIC. Needless to say, he lost his case.
