• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Man arrested for wearing T-shirt

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
NOTE: The shirts were not sold in that form at the mall, they had the shirts made.

DOWNS AND HIS SON, Roger Downs, each had a pro-peace shirt made Monday night. One shirt simply said "Let Inspections Work" on one side and "No War With Iraq" on the other. The other shirt said "Give Peace A Chance" on the front and "Peace On Earth" on the back. The men paid about $23 for each of the shirts and then wore them in the mall.

Basically they just have these t-shirt places where you go and pick out the font, image (if any) and they make up the shirt for you on the spot, so the bit about shirts like that being sold stock is irrelevant, since they were made to order.
And that makes a difference? It still seems rather intolerant of the Mall.
 
They may not have been saying anything, but they were creating enough of a disturbance to one employee, who called security.
My question is what the hell is wrong with this employee? Got offended by some people wearing t-shirts that they needed to call security?
 
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
NOTE: The shirts were not sold in that form at the mall, they had the shirts made.

DOWNS AND HIS SON, Roger Downs, each had a pro-peace shirt made Monday night. One shirt simply said "Let Inspections Work" on one side and "No War With Iraq" on the other. The other shirt said "Give Peace A Chance" on the front and "Peace On Earth" on the back. The men paid about $23 for each of the shirts and then wore them in the mall.

Basically they just have these t-shirt places where you go and pick out the font, image (if any) and they make up the shirt for you on the spot, so the bit about shirts like that being sold stock is irrelevant, since they were made to order.
And that makes a difference? It still seems rather intolerant of the Mall.

It makes a difference in that there is no ground for complaint based on the mall having those shirts on the shelf in that form, since they did not. It was rather pathetic of the guards to ask them to leave based on those shirts, but I wonder what the specific complaint of the store clerk was that pointed them out?
 
talk about being free...
rolleye.gif
 
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
NOTE: The shirts were not sold in that form at the mall, they had the shirts made.

DOWNS AND HIS SON, Roger Downs, each had a pro-peace shirt made Monday night. One shirt simply said "Let Inspections Work" on one side and "No War With Iraq" on the other. The other shirt said "Give Peace A Chance" on the front and "Peace On Earth" on the back. The men paid about $23 for each of the shirts and then wore them in the mall.

Basically they just have these t-shirt places where you go and pick out the font, image (if any) and they make up the shirt for you on the spot, so the bit about shirts like that being sold stock is irrelevant, since they were made to order.
And that makes a difference? It still seems rather intolerant of the Mall.

It makes a difference in that there is no ground for complaint based on the mall having those shirts on the shelf in that form, since they did not. It was rather pathetic of the guards to ask them to leave based on those shirts, but I wonder what the specific complaint of the store clerk was that pointed them out?
Well if you noticed I never said anything about the legality of the Malls action as I'm not a lawyer nor am I familiar with the laws of Albany or New York.

I agree with the rest of your post.
 
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
NOTE: The shirts were not sold in that form at the mall, they had the shirts made.

DOWNS AND HIS SON, Roger Downs, each had a pro-peace shirt made Monday night. One shirt simply said "Let Inspections Work" on one side and "No War With Iraq" on the other. The other shirt said "Give Peace A Chance" on the front and "Peace On Earth" on the back. The men paid about $23 for each of the shirts and then wore them in the mall.

Basically they just have these t-shirt places where you go and pick out the font, image (if any) and they make up the shirt for you on the spot, so the bit about shirts like that being sold stock is irrelevant, since they were made to order.
And that makes a difference? It still seems rather intolerant of the Mall.

It makes a difference in that there is no ground for complaint based on the mall having those shirts on the shelf in that form, since they did not. It was rather pathetic of the guards to ask them to leave based on those shirts, but I wonder what the specific complaint of the store clerk was that pointed them out?
Well if you noticed I never said anything about the legality of the Malls action as I'm not a lawyer nor am I familiar with the laws of Albany or New York.

I agree with the rest of your post.

Sorry, the statement about the grounds of it was for the people posting and saying "How could they throw him out for wearing a shirt that they had on the shelf?" 🙂
 
The shirts were made to order and then promptly put on while in the mall. I still can't help but think that the two gentlemen knew full well that they were going to get a reaction by anybody having an opinion one way or the other. From what was reported, a mall employee called security when they saw the men and I'm thinking that said employee was afraid of the potential for a disturbance hence the call.

Speed
 
Originally posted by: speed01
The shirts were made to order and then promptly put on while in the mall. I still can't help but think that the two gentlemen knew full well that they were going to get a reaction by anybody having an opinion one way or the other. From what was reported, a mall employee called security when they saw the men and I'm thinking that said employee was afraid of the potential for a disturbance hence the call.

Speed
Why would anybody even think that those shirts would cause a disturbance? Do they think that those who have opposing views lack self control?

 
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: speed01
The shirts were made to order and then promptly put on while in the mall. I still can't help but think that the two gentlemen knew full well that they were going to get a reaction by anybody having an opinion one way or the other. From what was reported, a mall employee called security when they saw the men and I'm thinking that said employee was afraid of the potential for a disturbance hence the call.

Speed
Why would anybody even think that those shirts would cause a disturbance? Do they think that those who have opposing views lack self control?

The potential for idiots with opposing views is always there.....more so when one is in a crowded environment such as a mall..

Speed

 
Originally posted by: speed01
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: speed01
The shirts were made to order and then promptly put on while in the mall. I still can't help but think that the two gentlemen knew full well that they were going to get a reaction by anybody having an opinion one way or the other. From what was reported, a mall employee called security when they saw the men and I'm thinking that said employee was afraid of the potential for a disturbance hence the call.

Speed
Why would anybody even think that those shirts would cause a disturbance? Do they think that those who have opposing views lack self control?

The potential for idiots with opposing views is always there.....more so when one is in a crowded environment such as a mall..

Speed
It's a bitch living in a free society isn't it.
rolleye.gif
 
That mall isn't too far away and it's MUCH bigger than the mall close to us. We go there about once or twice a month.
For people like us they generally leave us alone, but I've seen the security there be far less than nice to anyone they decide they don't like. I can say from first hand observation of other situations there that most likely the security was their usual insensitive selves and were no doubt pretty impolite to the guy. I'm sure the guy was no picnic either but considering how rude the mall security is they tend to put people on the offensive.
It is private property but Pyramid needs to remember that their property only stays open because of their customers.
They really need to send their guards to sensitivity training. Instead of saying take it off or leave, they would of done a lot better with an explanation to the man.
 
I'm not defending the actions of the mall (even though its only 15 mins. from me), but,
the mall is private property. It is not owned by the government. If the owners ask someone to leave, they must.

Lets put it in another perspective. If someone was on your lawn wearing clothing offensive to you and they refused to leave your property after you asked them to, wouldn't you call the cops.

Granted, this seems like a really stupid move by the mall owners but illegal, I don't think so.

Not that is unless you liberals think that mall owners somehow forefeit their rights to allow who they want on their premises.

Again, on the face of it, I think what the mall did was stupid. But I don't think it was illegal.
 
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: speed01
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: speed01
The shirts were made to order and then promptly put on while in the mall. I still can't help but think that the two gentlemen knew full well that they were going to get a reaction by anybody having an opinion one way or the other. From what was reported, a mall employee called security when they saw the men and I'm thinking that said employee was afraid of the potential for a disturbance hence the call.

Speed
Why would anybody even think that those shirts would cause a disturbance? Do they think that those who have opposing views lack self control?

The potential for idiots with opposing views is always there.....more so when one is in a crowded environment such as a mall..

Speed
It's a bitch living in a free society isn't it.
rolleye.gif

If only we lived in Iraq, where trouble-making liberal infidels like this wouldn't be tolerated.
 
How is wearing a peace t-shirt equated with plopping down and watching pornography inside a mall? Frankly, it's sad seeing the reaction on this message board, I don't feel any which way towards the war issue, but people have the right to express themselves in this country, and idly standing by and accepting bullsh!t like this is one of the saddest things I could possibly witness.

Should we all wear neutral grey clothing whenever we go out into public anymore? I mean, we can't possibly offend or disturb any poor weak soul. I say we should make grey clothing mandatory for everyone. No one can be offended by that.
 
I think that if some people went and had a shirts made reading "Inspections Don't Work" and "Bomb Iraq Now" and proceeded to put them on and walk around the mall the same would have happened. However, people would be pretty quick to point out how said shirt could cause a disturbance. Frankly I think the mall did the right thing. Better to remove the potential than risk a large disturbance and possible damage. As a side note, I heard the man who was arrested on the radio this morning and he seemed more upset that he couldn't eat the sub he had just bought when the police cuffed him. I had to chuckle at that...🙂

Speed
 
Originally posted by: JoeBaD
I'm not defending the actions of the mall (even though its only 15 mins. from me), but,
the mall is private property. It is not owned by the government. If the owners ask someone to leave, they must.

Lets put it in another perspective. If someone was on your lawn wearing clothing offensive to you and they refused to leave your property after you asked them to, wouldn't you call the cops.

Granted, this seems like a really stupid move by the mall owners but illegal, I don't think so.

Not that is unless you liberals think that mall owners somehow forefeit their rights to allow who they want on their premises.

Again, on the face of it, I think what the mall did was stupid. But I don't think it was illegal.
Since you live in that city do you actually know what the laws are regarding the right of the owners of the Mall to arbitrarily ask a customer to leave?
 
Originally posted by: Red Dawn

It's a bitch living in a free society isn't it.
rolleye.gif

Nah.... it's a bitch when everything has to be "PC" for fear of offending anyone. That and the fact that todays society seems to have more of a penchant for violence than it did when I was younger.

Speed
 
Originally posted by: speed01
Originally posted by: Red Dawn

It's a bitch living in a free society isn't it.
rolleye.gif

Nah.... it's a bitch when everything has to be "PC" for fear of offending anyone. That and the fact that todays society seems to have more of a penchant for violence than it did when I was younger.

Speed
Yet you support the Malls action to be PC in your previous post.
 
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
He was arrested for refusing the leave the mall, and they don't have to have a "good" reason to ask him to leave the mall.

As unfortunate as it may be, I fail to see how he has any legitimate complaint.

Viper GTS

but it wouldn't make good news if they didn't blow the whole thing out of porportion.
 
Originally posted by: Spagina
How is wearing a peace t-shirt equated with plopping down and watching pornography inside a mall? Frankly, it's sad seeing the reaction on this message board, I don't feel any which way towards the war issue, but people have the right to express themselves in this country, and idly standing by and accepting bullsh!t like this is one of the saddest things I could possibly witness.

Should we all wear neutral grey clothing whenever we go out into public anymore? I mean, we can't possibly offend or disturb any poor weak soul. I say we should make grey clothing mandatory for everyone. No one can be offended by that.

SO you have a right to walk into my house or a school and start giving a speach on your beliefs? Not at all. I find the reactions of the mall security to be sad, but think about the people that normally work rent-a-cop jobs. The beef I had is that they refused to leave after they were asked. The fact they got arrested is their own fault. This has nothing to do with the government. This is two private parties being pig headed...

Almost every commercial store in my area has a sign that says "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone", most do so because it allows them to remove shoplifters and trouble makers.
 
Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Yet you support the Malls action to be PC in your previous post.

And I still do in this post....🙂 Better safe than sorry given the position they are in and the potential involved. That doesn't however make it any less of a pain to have to deal with at every turn for fear of reprisal over hurting someones little feelings.

Speed
 
Originally posted by: JoeBaD
I'm not defending the actions of the mall (even though its only 15 mins. from me), but, the mall is private property. It is not owned by the government. If the owners ask someone to leave, they must. Lets put it in another perspective. If someone was on your lawn wearing clothing offensive to you and they refused to leave your property after you asked them to, wouldn't you call the cops. Granted, this seems like a really stupid move by the mall owners but illegal, I don't think so. Not that is unless you liberals think that mall owners somehow forefeit their rights to allow who they want on their premises. Again, on the face of it, I think what the mall did was stupid. But I don't think it was illegal.

I seem to remember that there was a similar Supreme Court case. I don't think this was illegal. A mall is private property.

Tacky? Yes.
Illegal? No.
 
Back
Top