Originally posted by: mosco
yeah, i am a poor high school student and i spent all the money i made last summer on a new mac and then my christmas money on home theater speakers so at the moment i am short on cash.
Originally posted by: toilet
mosco I ám a MAC user actually, I am graphic designer and 3d content creation... Look I work with mac but when I work in fash and internet I need a PC so I build a lot of them but Always have problem when I work .... but.. when put my hand in a nforce 2 motherboard my live change... YEs never hav problems with stability or corrupt renders etc..
So you need a asus or abit board a tbred or barton xp and buala!!!!!!!... ahhh buy good memory I thing like a DDR 333 be ok!!! but 2x 256Mb DDR 333 ( allways 2 sticks )
Weel good luck with PC world.. be welcome... look .. PC hardware have very good component but the only problem is the Operation System!!!.. A little detail!!!
good luck man!!
( ahh if you want to work in this machine buy a nvidia VGA card )
Originally posted by: Buz2b
I think you mean geForce 2 MX440, not geForce 4. If it were equal to a geforce 4 there wouldn't be any argument as to whether or not to get a separate video card.The onboard graphics is equal to a Geforce 4 MX 440 I believe
mosco,
You have enough info and seem like you're smart enough to do the right thing. Heck, at least you are going PC from Mac!:beer: Good luck in your endeavors. When you get down to building the system, don't forget you can get a lot of help here if you have any problems. Lots of knowledgable folks here.
The problem was, the link provided for the NewEgg offering didn't have a description that said anything about the video level. However, after jumping through a few hoops and finally getting the Epox (Europe was the only one I could get to load) site to load, I found you were correct; the onboard video for nForce2 is supposedly equal to geForce 4 MX. I stand corrected and chastised for not keeping up with the newer nForce offerings. I suppose if you want to share your RAM with your onboard graphics, then maybe it is an option. Personally, I wouldn't but as I said earlier, in this situation (and because they are looking to save a few bucks) it might be worth getting.The nForce1 IGP is GF2 MX, nForce2 IGP is GF4 MX. Just read Newegg's description.
No, not necessarily but do a Google search for "Dual Channel DDR" and you will get a better explanation. Dual channel enables two separate memory controlers so that two sticks run at 128 bit level. Would you see a vast difference in one 512 MB stick vs 2 x 256 MB; probably not.So i should always get 2 sticks? is that what they mean by dual channel?
About $20 per stick +/- and depending upon brand.I dont know wich diference in money are between 2x256Mb DDR 333 and DDR 400
Originally posted by: mosco
Well, a question still unanswered, what about Aopen vs MSI (both with integrated graphics). I like the board layout of an AOPen and it has a dual bios in case i mess the first one up. people seem happy with them.
Originally posted by: mosco
I can't remember if i already asked this yet but how exactly do i know if a board has SoundStorm audio? Is it any board with a 6channel out and optical out?
Good find! BTW, what are the specs on that ibook?I got the Compaq 17inch flat CRT i have now for about 17 dollars after rebate in one of those hot deals. I should have gotten 2...
Originally posted by: mosco
ah, its pretty crappy. ibook 466 SE, one of the old clamshell models. it runs os X but kinda slow. there is one on ebay going for 660 dollars right now which i think it way to much. We will see what happens though. I really want an Asus and a radeon 9500 Pro!
Ok, first I want to apologize for any feelings I might infringe upon. I would like to quote the March '03 issue of Maximum PC that, after some some "real time" testing with dual processor Mac and PC systems; using the same programs and scripts, loaded to their optimal settings, there simply was no contest. That exact quote was, "Mac people who scream that their Apples are faster than PC's are simply so full of crap, they could double as septic tanks." Harsh words I admit but if you take the time to read their test procedures and setups, you will see that they went the extra mile to make sure that all things were as equal as they could be considering the cross platform testing. They tested the (considered) best dual G4 system vs the better dual Athlon and dual Xeon systems. Even in Photoshop 7 (where Mac usually shines), using the same script, the Mac was a very poor show against the dual Athlon and especially the dual Xeon systems. Yes, the Mac system's CPU's were rated far below the PC's (in terms of MHz speed) but they were considered the best that Apple could offer and were pitted against dual processor PC systems. Apple, as AMD is fond of saying, claim that "speed isn't everything". Well, while I might agree in principle, you should read the results; they aren't pretty.Suprisingly enough, my friend bought an ibook after spending a couple hours in the Apple Store.
