M-16 might start to be replaced with new weapon made by HK by 2005

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,862
84
91
damn thats kewl looking. almost makes me want one. cept the rounds would go through too many walls for home defense right? ;)
 

zillafurby

Banned
Mar 16, 2004
219
0
0
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
damn thats kewl looking. almost makes me want one. cept the rounds would go through too many walls for home defense right? ;)

move to occupied jerusalem and it wont matter, eh?
 

Bulk Beef

Diamond Member
Aug 14, 2001
5,466
0
76
Originally posted by: bigredguy
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: bigredguy
Maybe one of these days the Navy will upgrade their M-14s.

why, it is a proven combat rifle. Excellent knock down power and great range.

And heavy, with a slow rate of fire.
Or not heavy enough, and too fast, depending on how you look at it.

Personally, I think they should implement a Designated Marksman program and give one or two guys in each squad an M-14 (or G3, or whatever) and a few extra weeks of marksmanship training. A guy with a 7.62 could give his squad the reach that they seem to lack right now, and the M-14 would be more than adequate for the job.

One cartridge can't do it all.
 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,921
14
81
Originally posted by: zillafurby
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
damn thats kewl looking. almost makes me want one. cept the rounds would go through too many walls for home defense right? ;)

move to occupied jerusalem and it wont matter, eh?

We occupied Jerusalem now? Cool.