Ls1 Monaro burnouts. 10 Second 1/4's

[LAUST]

Bring it on

 

[BadNewsBears]

Wow, was there a fire there in the last year or so?

 

[LAUST]

yeah I think so

 

[MercenaryForHire]

Originally posted by: fyleow
My post clearly stated EX while yours just said "Civic" so maybe you should STFU.

The original post I quoted was stating the "lowliest car Honda produces" - which would be the Civic DX and not the EX as shown. So I corrected that.

And it's stilla CIVIC...AKA lowliest car honda makes so please STFU

The Civic LX is the lowliest conventional engined-car Honda makes, not the EX. Hey, an Si(R) is still a Civic, so that must be the lowliest car they make. Right? RIGHT? So the lowliest Honda must be 160hp!

kthxbye

OMGZ I CAN LINK TOO EDMUNDS TOO HURRRRRRRRRRR

And you got owned by your rotary comment too, because it's technically 3.9L...are you just conviniently ignoring that comment because you're wrong?

I dont wanna drag this into OT, but technically, the rotary is 3.9L. In a full cycle, 1.3L is displaced 3 times.

He didn't want to drag this into OT. So I didn't. And that's a technicality - the concept originally pushed was engine size vs output - and there's no doubt the RX-8's Wankel is smaller & lighter than a V8. The reason I decided to correct you again was because you seem to think that despite being slammed in the face with specifications and details from independent reviewers and the manufacturer itself, you still think you're right.

So go ahead. Tell me that there's no such thing as the 1.7L D-series that's in my Civic right now. Tell me that it makes 127hp and that it MUST have VTEC.

- M4H

 

[SupaDupaCheez]

^
I
I
Ouch....that hurt 🙂