Originally posted by: Marshallj
Dr. Atkins was a doctor, maybe you'd listen to the comments he made?
But seriously, if you have weak kidneys then you can have kidney failure, just like if you have a weak heart and went to jog 5 miles you could have a heart attack.
There is so much FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) spread about the diet by the naysayers that you don't know what to believe. But I tried it myself and found that they were full of sh!t.
Well, I've done some research on the diet, because I wondered if it was right for me. It obviously works, because people are losing weight.
I also don't accept "Atkins is bad, don't do it" as an answer. The doctor gave a fairly decent explanation of why she thought it wasn't a good diet.
My only problem with the Atkins diet, outside of my dislike for many of the staple foods of the program, is that it's untested in the long term. The "standard" diet of eating healthy and exercise is hundreds of thousands of years old. We've eaten like that, for the most part, for quite a while. How such a high saturated fat/cholesterol diet would affect people, especially in the faster paced, higher stress world of today isn't apparent.
Sure, there are those (such as the Coral Calcium guy, his name escapes me at the moment) who say that a diet high in antioxidants and calcium would nullify the free radicals that cause holes to form in the arteries (I don't know much about that subject), thereby nullifying the cholesterol count in the blood. That flies in the face of the conventional way of thinking, which isn't a bad thing, but I gravitate towards the "tried and true", especially when dealing with health issues.
Perhaps Atkins will revolutionize the human diet, but we seem to be doing all right with the balanced diet with exercise.