• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Lost TA members

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
and... lest I be accused of a lack of humilty (or diplomacy)...


> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 1:37 PM
> To: Paul Gentle
> Subject: Sorry about the rancor
>
>
> Perhaps too much reading between the lines on my part - I
> don't know.
> I understand you probably get alot of mail about this stuff
> - but I truly
> only wanted the official word about sending mail to our
> members from our own
> lists.
>
> There has been a heated debate for some time.
>
> Anyway - I don't hate you, (hell, I don't even know you) I was just
> irritated.
> Hope you'll forgive me - I apologize.


No problem. I can understand completely. I'm just trying to help.
between real work, dnet emails, and other dnet work its a lot,
sometimes my emails are more to t the point than they should be.

I really like TA and the work they do. I just don't want to see you
guys get in trouble.

Keep up the good work
paul

Paul Gentle
moose@distributed.net
.plan @ http://n0cgi.distributed.net/cgi/dnet-finger.cgi?user=moose
 
If Dnet dislikes the idea of teams sending their team members information so much why is it even an option to display your e-mail? If memory serves me right it's even the default listing mode (and if it isn't the person has actively chosen to be reachable). No logic there...
 
Riv,

That may simply be a limitation of the stats script. There has to be some way to differentiate membership and, without the member selecting a specific option, it has to default to something.

Russ, NCNE
 
Considering Dnet's position in this matter I don't understand why the default isn't "Participant #".

Mostly I'm upset that I've wasted 3 hours collecting the addresses and removing the few that rejoined during the past two days. Ok, let's recruit 70 people to make up for the loss 🙁
 
Riv,

I, and I'm sure many others, appreciate the effort and your team spirit. We need more like you.

Russ, NCNE
 
Riv, I think a lot of it has to do with not confusing new members. When someone searches for their email addy when they first start cracking, it's a heck of a lot easier to understand a email addy, than an obscure participant #.:Q I'm sure Dnet would have switched it long ago if it was fessable.
 
"Ok, let's recruit 70 people to make up for the loss"

I will try to be more discriminating and get you 100 cpus to help replace the loss. That might take 2-3 weeks though.

BTW, I have my eyes on the 25 computers at a downtown charitable organization. Two people there have asked someone I know about rc5.
 
Back
Top