IndyColtsFan
Lifer
- Sep 22, 2007
- 33,655
- 688
- 126
But is it worth having to look over your shoulder???
http://www.politico.com/magazine/st...ng-for-us-plutocrats-108014.html#.U7RXZ7G4PFI
The Pitchforks Are Coming For Us Plutocrats
You probably dont know me, but like you I am one of those .01%ers, a proud and unapologetic capitalist.
Seeing where things are headed is the essence of entrepreneurship. And what do I see in our future now?
I see pitchforks.
At the same time that people like you and me are thriving beyond the dreams of any plutocrats in history, the rest of the countrythe 99.99 percentis lagging far behind. The divide between the haves and have-nots is getting worse really, really fast.
The problem is that inequality is at historically high levels and getting worse every day. Our country is rapidly becoming less a capitalist society and more a feudal society.
Unless our policies change dramatically, the middle class will disappear, and we will be back to late 18th-century France. Before the revolution.
And so I have a message for my fellow filthy rich, for all of us who live in our gated bubble worlds: Wake up, people. It wont last.
If we dont do something to fix the glaring inequities in this economy, the pitchforks are going to come for us.
No society can sustain this kind of rising inequality.
In fact, there is no example in human history where wealth accumulated like this and the pitchforks didnt eventually come out.
You show me a highly unequal society, and I will show you a police state. Or an uprising. There are no counterexamples. None. Its not if, its when.
The most ironic thing about rising inequality is how completely unnecessary and self-defeating it is. If we do something about it, if we adjust our policies in the way that, say, Franklin D. Roosevelt did during the Great Depressionso that we help the 99 percent and preempt the revolutionaries and crazies, the ones with the pitchforksthat will be the best thing possible for us rich folks, too. Its not just that well escape with our lives; its that well most certainly get even richer.
Since when is $200K "rich" or in the 1%?

