no one should be surprised by this. look forward to anand/brian's explanation.
so either everyone is testing in a freezer, or anandtech has a bad review unit.
maybe not a bad unit, but perhaps the software version on AT's unit (which has been shown to be different across several review sites) has unique/bad throttling parameters set.
maybe not a bad unit, but perhaps the software version on AT's unit (which has been shown to be different across several review sites) has unique/bad throttling parameters set.
I don't recall in recent memory a phone that would thermally throttle just from heavy usage. Every phone I've ever owned was capable of running the processor at full load at max clocks more or less indefinitely without overheating. Only sitting in sunlight or something similar would cause them to throttle or overheat.
Ouch. However, he does say "it gets hot but not *that* hot". Not sure what that means, but I've never owned a phone that gotten even moderately warm, even with games etc. So, even if it's just "hot but not *that* hot", it's a concern.wow. very interesting. he mentions in a later tweet that he thinks the throttling may be too agressive.
Ouch. However, he does say "it gets hot but not *that* hot". Not sure what that means, but I've never owned a phone that gotten even moderately warm, even with games etc. So, even if it's just "hot but not *that* hot", it's a concern.
Not in normal day to day use, but I know my iPhones (3G and 4), the S3, the Nexus, the Incredible, heck just about all of them would get quite hot when being used while charging.
They don't need room to dissipate heat. None of the SOCs generate enough to worry about.
Weren't people trying to say that heat dissipation from the CPU wasn't a factor in cellphones, when we were arguing about phone size a few days ago?
The truth comes out!
Considering this is more or the less the first time this has ever been an issue I don't see how you're trying to use that for something said in the past. Someone(was it you?) said that a phone as powerful as the Galaxy S3 couldn't be done in a phone body smaller than the GS3 which was completely ridiculous.
First time it's been an issue because the manufacturers are playing it safe and limiting powerful processors to larger phones.
What I said was that there is always a trade off. Making something smaller either costs more or parts need to be left out. Nothing ridiculous about it, why would the S3 mini have reduced specs if Samsung could fit the regular S3 hardware into it?
Just think about it backwards- if you can make phone X as a 4" phone, then you make the exact same hardware into a 5" phone, you have a lot of extra space. You can clock the CPU higher, or add a bigger battery, a larger speaker, or whatever. Given the same technology, more space simply gives you more features or allows for better thermal dissipation.