zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 110,592
- 29,221
- 146
Back when Hillary was being investigated I said pretty much the same thing I say about Trump, show me the evidence.
I don't like Hillary, I don't like Trump either. I don't hate either one.
The issue behind all of our words, here, is that you claim that propaganda and information don't work. That people are incapable of being convinced by information, by propaganda, by intentionally faked news. I wonder why you make this claim, and so I ask if you believe certain things that are otherwise known to be completely false (Re: Hillary).
So really, two issues: Do you honestly believe that advertising, information, propaganda are ineffective? If so, what leads you to think this way?
Second, do you maybe understand that you are very likely a serious victim of such propaganda? We all are, to a certain degree; and as far as I know, every human is capable of this. Our brains are constantly working to reinforce the order and "truth" that it has constructed. Advertisers have only ever sought to exploit this socio-biological system.
further, the Fox News purists have only ever lived under the belief that a vast liberal conspiracy of fake leftwing media has the country in thrall, and it has been this way for decades and decades and decades. I take you as arguing from the right, because you essentially always are, so I will lump you in here, but please address this: How can one support the idea of a "leftwing media" that is out to pervert the minds of people, if people are likewise incapable of being influenced by propaganda, or any information, ...as long as it was Russians accused of the information war?
How do those two arguments square? Because if you aren't explicitly making it, the entirety of your party sure as shit is.