• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

LOL@Al Gore

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: IGBT
..glut gore is making a killing off the ecoFOOLS. He's showing us the way to cash in on the carbon-con. be like algore.

No more eco-theists? 🙁


..are you still wearing mint flavored shoes these days??
 
Originally posted by: PlasmaBomb
Originally posted by: Pantoot
I like how they measure his yearly usage against an average houses monthly usage.
Although it would have been far more sensational to put something like:
In the past year Al Gore's home burned through 213,210 kWh, enough to power 169,178 average American homes for an hour.
I will see your sensationalism and raise you!

In the past year Al Gore's home burned through 213,210 kWh of electricity, enough electricity to power every single household in America for 5.5 seconds...
At the current rate, in 6 years, Al Gore's home would have burned through more electricity than what is required for Dr. Emmett Brown's DeLorean to time travel.

:Q
 
I feel like we have another category that threads like this would fit better. Something to do with politics? or news? and it is thataway >>>>>>>>>>>>
 
according to snopes, himself and Tipper work from said house. so that yearly energy consumption is comprised of both at-home and at-work usage. so he uses 1776 kWh per month. thats probably only $200 or so in electric bills every month 😛
 
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: PlasmaBomb
Originally posted by: Pantoot
I like how they measure his yearly usage against an average houses monthly usage.
Although it would have been far more sensational to put something like:
In the past year Al Gore's home burned through 213,210 kWh, enough to power 169,178 average American homes for an hour.
I will see your sensationalism and raise you!

In the past year Al Gore's home burned through 213,210 kWh of electricity, enough electricity to power every single household in America for 5.5 seconds...
At the current rate, in 6 years, Al Gore's home would have burned through more electricity than what is required for Dr. Emmett Brown's DeLorean to time travel.

:Q

kWh !- kW. It's not clear how much time it takes the DeLorean to travel through time, but if it took one second it would only use 336 kWh.
 
Originally posted by: venkman
1.21 Jiggawatts!?!?!!?!?

:Q

It's that damned Emmit Brown out back trying to get that damned time machine working, so Gore can actually win by a hanging chad in the year 2000.

Jugs
 
Originally posted by: Argo
Energy Guzzled by Al Gore?s Home in Past Year Could Power 232 U.S. Homes for a Month

What an ass-backwards comparison. They're comparing energy used by Al Gore for 1 year to energy used by average us home for 1 month. Why not say that:

Energy used by Al Gore in past year could power 20 us homes?

haha I just posted the same thing in P&N.....ahhh misleading the public.
 
Originally posted by: her209
At the current rate, in 6 years, Al Gore's home would have burned through more electricity than what is required for Dr. Emmett Brown's DeLorean to time travel.

:Q
Wouldn't that only be 1.21 MWh?
 
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Argo
Energy Guzzled by Al Gore?s Home in Past Year Could Power 232 U.S. Homes for a Month

What an ass-backwards comparison. They're comparing energy used by Al Gore for 1 year to energy used by average us home for 1 month. Why not say that:

Energy used by Al Gore in past year could power 20 us homes?

haha I just posted the same thing in P&N.....ahhh misleading the public.

AND if the outright lying in the articl weren't bad enough...

This is just propaganda.
Al Gore already explained that he uses his home as his office and does filming and interviews there. He did a major green renovation which reduced the electric consumption to what it is now.
It is unfair to compare a small film studios electric use to that of the average homeowner.

 
Originally posted by: BornStar
Originally posted by: her209
At the current rate, in 6 years, Al Gore's home would have burned through more electricity than what is required for Dr. Emmett Brown's DeLorean to time travel.

:Q
Wouldn't that only be 1.21 MWh?
Nope, the units are in kilos.
 
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: BornStar
Originally posted by: her209
At the current rate, in 6 years, Al Gore's home would have burned through more electricity than what is required for Dr. Emmett Brown's DeLorean to time travel.

:Q
Wouldn't that only be 1.21 MWh?
Nope, the units are in kilos.
Right you are. Silly me.
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: spidey07
LOL! 10% MORE usage after the "green" renovations. What a tool.

No, he's actually a brilliant businessman.

The tools are those falling for his scheme.

Sad but true.
🙁

What I found most alarming is all the "green" efforts used so much more. The original story broke over a year ago about him using so much and he took a lot of flak for it. He didn't try to do things with his home until his hypocrisy was shown. And after all that, he uses MORE!!??

And I wouldn't say brilliant, knows how to sell ice cubes to an eskimo would be more appropriate.
 
You're right, spidey. I'm using the term 'brilliant' strictly in the business sense.

And why worry? Gore is a lot like Slick; You could have the guy on videotape robbing a bank and we'd have a board full of liberals telling us all the great things Al was going to do with that money.
 
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: spidey07
LOL! 10% MORE usage after the "green" renovations. What a tool.

No, he's actually a brilliant businessman.

The tools are those falling for his scheme.

Sad but true.
🙁

What I found most alarming is all the "green" efforts used so much more. The original story broke over a year ago about him using so much and he took a lot of flak for it. He didn't try to do things with his home until his hypocrisy was shown. And after all that, he uses MORE!!??

And I wouldn't say brilliant, knows how to sell ice cubes to an eskimo would be more appropriate.

He's managed to make it fashionable/trendy to go "green." Oh, and those poor polar bears... Very clever marketing. Pick something cute and adorable to rally others to your cause. The polar bears are the least of our problems (Before someone calls me a polar bear hater, I do care about the polar bears). He's managed to convince quite a handful of dilettantes who spread the message that "global warming is real." :roll: Yea? No shit? But of course, with them, comes the other extreme...
 
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: spidey07
LOL! 10% MORE usage after the "green" renovations. What a tool.

No, he's actually a brilliant businessman.

The tools are those falling for his scheme.

Sad but true.
🙁

What I found most alarming is all the "green" efforts used so much more. The original story broke over a year ago about him using so much and he took a lot of flak for it. He didn't try to do things with his home until his hypocrisy was shown. And after all that, he uses MORE!!??

And I wouldn't say brilliant, knows how to sell ice cubes to an eskimo would be more appropriate.

You're assuming his energy usage went up because of his energy-saving measures, which I doubt is the case.
 
retrofitting your house like that probably was far worse on the environment than just leaving it and replacing things as they broke. Swapping out a perfectly good system is rarely the right choice, IMHO.
 
Originally posted by: JS80
The Goricle would, of course, respond that he purchases "carbon offsets" that nullify his energy consumption. But I think the response to that is the programs that offer "carbon offsets" are scams meant to keep the poorest of the poor in 3rd world countries poor. It's as if my continued consumption of energy is made to disappear if I pay some illiterate farmer in Bolivia to plant some more cocoa leaves. That way I'm ensured that I feel better about my energy consumption, and I ensure that the illiterate farmer in Bolivia stays illiterate.

I'd have to read up on it to be positive (and I actually don't care to look it up), but I believe the money he "spends" on carbon offsets comes right back into his own pocket.
 
Originally posted by: mugs
You're assuming his energy usage went up because of his energy-saving measures, which I doubt is the case.

Not really, I'm not assuming his usage went up because of said measures. The point is after all these actions his usage still went up, which means his overall consumption went up (when it clearly was supposed to go down after the criticism). That makes him more than a hypocrite, that makes him a tool.

I can understand weather climate to ones energy consumption, what I can't understand nor forgive is USING MORE ENERGY in face of different weather for the year.

It's not that difficult to take note that it's really hot out and to conserve energy you take active measures in your behavior. It is clear that Gore does not believe or practice in that which he preaches.
 
Back
Top