OREOSpeedwagon
Diamond Member
Originally posted by: Taejin
There are plenty of other BT sites overseas that are out of the reach of the MPAA, and actions like this by the MPAA only serve to fuel their growth.
:thumbsup: i like the bay of pirates 🙂
Originally posted by: Taejin
There are plenty of other BT sites overseas that are out of the reach of the MPAA, and actions like this by the MPAA only serve to fuel their growth.
Maybe they'll start suing ISPs for providing access to users to those type of sites. I dunno.Originally posted by: Taejin
*shrug* It's always been like this, from Napster to Kazaa, from "cheap" mp3 services to allofmp3.com. They're all fucked, and howevermuch the American organizations froth at the mouth, they won't be able to get to them all.
Yeah, I wonder how long it will take until the RIAA / MPAA start demanding a "national firewall" sort of like China uses, except it will be controlled by themselves rather than (or in addition to) the government. That, combined with "cop chips" mandated in all "digital devices" would keep illegal content (and content that the government just doesn't happen to like) from spreading much at all. I'm really looking forward to the future in the United States of Entertainment. :roll:Originally posted by: her209
Maybe they'll start suing ISPs for providing access to users to those type of sites. I dunno.Originally posted by: Taejin
*shrug* It's always been like this, from Napster to Kazaa, from "cheap" mp3 services to allofmp3.com. They're all fucked, and howevermuch the American organizations froth at the mouth, they won't be able to get to them all.
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
250k per movie is less than reasonable heh
Originally posted by: Taejin
I don't understand what the big deal with LokiTorrent getting shut down is..
There are plenty of other BT sites overseas that are out of the reach of the MPAA, and actions like this by the MPAA only serve to fuel their growth.
*shrug* It's always been like this, from Napster to Kazaa, from "cheap" mp3 services to allofmp3.com. They're all fucked, and howevermuch the American organizations froth at the mouth, they won't be able to get to them all.
Originally posted by: SuperTool
I guess if you are going to run a BT tracker, do it in Russia 😉
Originally posted by: SuPrEIVIE
if my product were fairly priced then i don't think that would happen....Originally posted by: Babbles
:thumbsup:Originally posted by: Amused
Every last fscking one of you people bitching about the MPAA would whine and kick like a schoolgirl if someone stole your work product from you.
The downloader is the distributer in P2P. You're saying that if there are 50 people trading a movie, they should each be fined $250k (total fines of $12.5M)? There were at most 50 illegal copies made , which at an MSRP of $30 means that they lost, at worst $1500.Originally posted by: digitalsm
Uh, maybe for downloading. But its certainly reasonable for those illegal distributing.Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
250k per movie is less than reasonable heh
Originally posted by: Vic
Their product IS fairly priced. Their sales numbers prove it.Originally posted by: SuPrEIVIE
if my product were fairly priced then i don't think that would happen....Originally posted by: Babbles
:thumbsup:Originally posted by: Amused
Every last fscking one of you people bitching about the MPAA would whine and kick like a schoolgirl if someone stole your work product from you.
Originally posted by: her209
SIDE RANT: Preview commercials that are placed at the beginning of a DVD and that cannot skipped should be made illegal.
Originally posted by: silverpig
Originally posted by: her209
SIDE RANT: Preview commercials that are placed at the beginning of a DVD and that cannot skipped should be made illegal.
Normally I would rent movies instead of going to the theatre to see a lot of "meh" movies, but now I don't even rent them because of this.
I used to gladly go to the theatre and pay $5 for a movie, or $2.50 to rent one. Now it's $15 to go see a movie after sitting through 25 minutes of commercials and $7 to rent a DVD with unskippable commercials at the beginning.
Originally posted by: silverpig
Originally posted by: her209
SIDE RANT: Preview commercials that are placed at the beginning of a DVD and that cannot skipped should be made illegal.
Normally I would rent movies instead of going to the theatre to see a lot of "meh" movies, but now I don't even rent them because of this.
I used to gladly go to the theatre and pay $5 for a movie, or $2.50 to rent one. Now it's $15 to go see a movie after sitting through 25 minutes of commercials and $7 to rent a DVD with unskippable commercials at the beginning.
Originally posted by: silverpig
Originally posted by: Vic
Their product IS fairly priced. Their sales numbers prove it.Originally posted by: SuPrEIVIE
if my product were fairly priced then i don't think that would happen....Originally posted by: Babbles
:thumbsup:Originally posted by: Amused
Every last fscking one of you people bitching about the MPAA would whine and kick like a schoolgirl if someone stole your work product from you.
Movie prices have tripled in 10 years (at least here).
Inflation rate is 12%? :QOriginally posted by: Babbles
Hi, can you say inflation?
What, do you expect prices to remain the same over the course of ten years?
It is amazing what people will say to justify their actions.
Originally posted by: her209
Inflation rate is 12%? :QOriginally posted by: Babbles
Hi, can you say inflation?
What, do you expect prices to remain the same over the course of ten years?
It is amazing what people will say to justify their actions.
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
As much as the current movie/music downloader likes to consider himself (or herself) a modern-day Robin Hood to justify the blatant stealing of material, let's be honest. When you download music or a movie, you are stealing. It's pretty simple. Sure, we can say things like "it's unfair how much they charge for movies" blah blah blah and that might be true, but that doesn't mean our theft is justified. If I go to a hotdog stand and the guy charges me $4 for the dog and I don't think that's fair, should I just grab as many hotdogs as I can and run? Clearly, no.
So get off your moral high horse and recognize that you are committing a crime and no amount of dressing or rhetoric is going to change that fact.
Except you've denied them the chance to sell it to everyone with whom you've p2p-shared the free copy, both directly and indirectly.Originally posted by: amdfanboy
IP isn't a physical thing. You can't deprive the owner of their ability to resell it in the traditional sense. You can only deprive them by flooding the market with free versions of it. They could still sell it, you've "stolen" nothing. This is even more true if you never would have bought it in the first place.
Originally posted by: rh71
MPAA controls tv-show rights also ?