• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Lockheed Martin Wins JSF competition

Congrat to Lockheed, the brass probably didn't like the Boeing's unconventional design. This is like one of biggest defense contract in history. We won't see any real deployment of the JSF until 2010. This is still not a sure thing, Congress might get stupid and cut the whole thing.
 
[qWe won't see any real deployment of the JSF until 2010. This is still not a sure thing, Congress might get stupid and cut the whole thing.[/i] >>



Doubtful considering the current state of affairs.
 
Cool! Just what Lockheed Martin needed a shot in the bottom line. 🙂

This way they wont fold up and go the way of the Dodo. 😀
 


<< any stats on this jsf? >>

i think it's the x35. the boeing model was the x36. ill see what i can dig up, i read alot about them in the past, supposed to be bad stuff!
 
Correct me if Im worng and I know you will but doesnt Lockheed-Martin have just a little more experience with fighters than Boeing?
 
And up goes their stock.

Thats a big damn contract. You know there are some nice bonuses for the guys who landed that.

Tonight they shall party.
 
This is like one of biggest defense contract in history.

Actually THE biggest according to CNN. $200 B, although I hear boeing may contribute.
 
Boeing does have some experiecne with fighters with it's MacDonald Douglas aquisition a couple years back.

Cheers,
Aquaman
 
What happened to Gruman and General Dynamics? No entries or dont they exist anymore?

Havent kept up with the mergers in the Aircraft business.
 
Lockheed won't see the majority of the money for a few years to come. This JSF thing is like a jack of all trade. Fighter/bomber, a jump jet version for the Marine and British Navy.
 
Boeing will have a hand in the development of the plane (as Lockeed would if Boeing landed the contract). The government doesn't want to put all the eggs in one basket, so there will be parts, contracted out to Boeing to do. Lockeed needed this much more than Boeing considering Boeing does still produce C17's, attack helicopters and has a completely seperate civilian line of planes.

vash
 
No specs on it yet? With this, and the f-22, we'll completely rule the airs. Wait, i'm unfamiliar with this. This is a different plane then the F-22 right? Anyways, boeing does have some experience with fighters since they took mcdonnel douglas in a few years back.
 


<< No specs on it yet? With this, and the f-22, we'll completely rule the airs. Wait, i'm unfamiliar with this. This is a different plane then the F-22 right? Anyways, boeing does have some experience with fighters since they took mcdonnel douglas in a few years back. >>



Yes the F-22 Raptor is different. It is basically a everything jet.... It has the bombing power of a Stealth Bomber and the agility of a f-16. but it costs a bunch.
 


<< Boeing will have a hand in the development of the plane (as Lockeed would if Boeing landed the contract). >>




Hmmmm.......this from CNN completely contradicts that opinion............



<< Undersecretary of Defense Pete Aldridge said conditions of the contract do not require Lockheed-Martin to share any of the work with Boeing, but added that the government would not stop them from doing so.

"While the Boeing team was not selected, they did an excellent job in the process," Aldridge said. "If Lockheed-Martin wishes to use the unique talents of Boeing they may do so." >>





 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top