• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Local News

cremator

Senior member
Just saw this in my local paper, how abusive can some people be?
-------------Quote-------------------

Coweta County Magistrate Jim Stripling has threatened to sue the county for the $25 too much that he spent on a meal while on business.

County employees on trips in Georgia get a $35 a day meal allowance. But Stripling decided to spend almost $60 on his meals one day. When the county refused to use taxpayer money to pay for his expensive dinner, Stripling threatened to sue.
 
Originally posted by: waggy
whoa.

thats just wrong. sheehs he could not eat on $60 a day?

No, he could not eat on $35 per day. Instead he decided to spend $60 (probably felt that his position entitled him to it). The County only compensated him for $35, thus the $25 lawsuit.
 
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: waggy
whoa.

thats just wrong. sheehs he could not eat on $60 a day?

No, he could not eat on $35 per day. Instead he decided to spend $60 (probably felt that his position entitled him to it). The County only compensated him for $35, thus the $25 lawsuit.

oh heh.

I can't read and my trained monkey occasionly makes mistakes!

still $35 a day is possible. Granted you will not be eating the best food.
 
Originally posted by: waggy
whoa.

thats just wrong. sheehs he could not eat on $60 a day?



It's not a matter of money. it's a matter of principal.

Taxpayers are supposed to spring for this important person's expenses. They didn't do that. Now bring on the judge!
 
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: waggy
whoa.

thats just wrong. sheehs he could not eat on $60 a day?

No, he could not eat on $35 per day. Instead he decided to spend $60 (probably felt that his position entitled him to it). The County only compensated him for $35, thus the $25 lawsuit.

oh heh.

I can't read and my trained monkey occasionly makes mistakes!

still $35 a day is possible. Granted you will not be eating the best food.

$35 is possible? I should be so lucky as to spend that much on myself for food every day...
 
Originally posted by: Zanix
Originally posted by: waggy
whoa.

thats just wrong. sheehs he could not eat on $60 a day?



It's not a matter of money. it's a matter of principal.

Taxpayers are supposed to spring for this important person's expenses. They didn't do that. Now bring on the judge!

*checking sarcasm detector*
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: waggy
whoa.

thats just wrong. sheehs he could not eat on $60 a day?

No, he could not eat on $35 per day. Instead he decided to spend $60 (probably felt that his position entitled him to it). The County only compensated him for $35, thus the $25 lawsuit.

oh heh.

I can't read and my trained monkey occasionly makes mistakes!

still $35 a day is possible. Granted you will not be eating the best food.

$35 is possible? I should be so lucky as to spend that much on myself for food every day...

sure. but $35 is not the best stuff. There have been times while on business trips where i hit the $50 limit i had. WE couldnt always choose where we were going to eat. Sometimes we had to go to the closest place or meet someone at a place that was expensive.

 
Back
Top