I hate how every distribution does stuff differently... redhat 7 sets up apache pretty well, with a standard httpd.conf, and /var/www for documents
redhat 5 is similar, but the documents go in /home/httpd
mandrake 8 is beyond me. i've found the config files, but cannot for the life of me figure out how to allow people to access the stuff in cgi-bin. /perl works fine, but I am not just using perl scripts. and the config files are split into 3. and there is this httpd-perl thing I've never heard of.
hopefully debian will do it like redhat. my only problems with redhat are 1. it's bigger than XP... and neither fit on an 850mb hard drive if you want functionality 2. rpm's are a pain
</rant>
edit: i guess my biggest issue is just that they dont all do it the way apache defaults.
redhat 5 is similar, but the documents go in /home/httpd
mandrake 8 is beyond me. i've found the config files, but cannot for the life of me figure out how to allow people to access the stuff in cgi-bin. /perl works fine, but I am not just using perl scripts. and the config files are split into 3. and there is this httpd-perl thing I've never heard of.
hopefully debian will do it like redhat. my only problems with redhat are 1. it's bigger than XP... and neither fit on an 850mb hard drive if you want functionality 2. rpm's are a pain
</rant>
edit: i guess my biggest issue is just that they dont all do it the way apache defaults.
