• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Linux support: The single most frustrating thing in all of computing

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: ViRGE
Originally posted by: sleuth bandit
You clearly don't understand the purpose of open source. Go Away
Clearly you don't understand the purpose either.

ps. linux is crap. use bsd.
BSD is crap, it isn't built up well enough. Use Tiger.😛
I have no use for overpriced mac hardware or software. Nor do I want my flavor choice of bsd to be "built up".
 
I hear ya dude. Many Linux Users are their for the Clique and not the OS. Part of being in a Clique is to keep others out, unless they are especially gifted/knowledgeable and can contribute to the Clique. Unfortunetly these types are the more Vocal and snarly Linux Users you'll meet, the real Experts are busy Coding and such, not having much time to interface with Users.

Linux still needs a lot of Polish before it'll be used widespread. Some are trying add that Polish, but others resist them because their Clique relies on the Exclusivity of Linux as it's reason for existance.
 
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Because NOBODY seems to be able to support anything, under any circumstances (unless you went and paid for RedHat or whatever the hell they call it now).

What, you wanted free support too?

Originally posted by: EyeMWing
because there is yet to be a non-brokeassed routing solution for Windows.

So, you're anti-Linux, anti-Windows. Gotcha.
 
Originally posted by: ghostman
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Because NOBODY seems to be able to support anything, under any circumstances (unless you went and paid for RedHat or whatever the hell they call it now).

What, you wanted free support too?

Originally posted by: EyeMWing
because there is yet to be a non-brokeassed routing solution for Windows.

So, you're anti-Linux, anti-Windows. Gotcha.

Windows is excellent for about 11ty billion applications. BSD is excellent for 11ty billion others. Linux... I'm yet to find a situation where it's the best choice. Macs USED to be useful for 3 applications. Now they've shoehorned themselves into doing a single role well. It amuses me greatly.

Solution to this problem: Went and grabbed a WRT54G, converted server back to Win2k3. I'm going to mod the life out of it and throw on OpenWRT.
 
Originally posted by: FoBoT
you just need a good linux router?

http://www.clarkconnect.com

don't screw with all that fancy stuff, this one is easy and works out of the box, er off the cd without messing around

Heh, I actually wanted a full fledged server OS that could also serve as a router in it's time off. But instead, I'm doing OpenWRT/Win2k3 double-duty.
 
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: ghostman
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Because NOBODY seems to be able to support anything, under any circumstances (unless you went and paid for RedHat or whatever the hell they call it now).

What, you wanted free support too?

Originally posted by: EyeMWing
because there is yet to be a non-brokeassed routing solution for Windows.

So, you're anti-Linux, anti-Windows. Gotcha.

Windows is excellent for about 11ty billion applications. BSD is excellent for 11ty billion others. Linux... I'm yet to find a situation where it's the best choice. Macs USED to be useful for 3 applications. Now they've shoehorned themselves into doing a single role well. It amuses me greatly.

Solution to this problem: Went and grabbed a WRT54G, converted server back to Win2k3. I'm going to mod the life out of it and throw on OpenWRT.

Linux and BSD have smiliar uses. They both can be used for server and desktop applications. I use each for both. While FreeBSD preformance is better then Linux, there appears to be more applications made for Linux. So there are pros and cons to each.
 
feel better?

I suppose there are those that enjoy that 12 hours of mecking around but I would just rather get work done??
 
Originally posted by: deathkoba
If you need the power of Unix, get a Macintosh. Hell if you need POWER, get a Power Macintosh.

................. You, sir... Don't deserve the rest of that phrase.
 
Back
Top