Linux and Windows refresh rates?

oniq

Banned
Feb 17, 2002
4,196
0
0
I'm trying to get my monitor (17" DigiView) and my graphics card (Geforce Ti500) to work in Linux with the same refresh rate I got in Windows (I'm very much used to it and can't stand anything else). In Windows its 62.8Khz and 70Hz at 1152x864, I can do 1152x864 in Linux but with a refresh rate of 75Hz.. any ideas? I tried using xvidtune but that didn't yield any good results.
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Not to be an ass, but I find it amazing how sensitive some people are to this. I could not, for the life of me, tell you even *how* I would check that on my machines!
 

GonzoDaGr8

Platinum Member
Apr 29, 2001
2,183
1
0
I could not, for the life of me, tell you even *how* I would check that on my machines!

Unless you have older monitors, your monitors' on-screen display should be able to tell you what your current frequency setting is.


In Windows its 62.8Khz and 70Hz at 1152x864, I can do 1152x864 in Linux but with a refresh rate of 75Hz..

Like BBWF said, you are complaining of getting a higher reffresh in Linux than Windows? That doesn't make sense to me. I personally can't handle anything lower than 85hz. 75hz is noticeable to me and 60hz gives me a migraine.
 

oniq

Banned
Feb 17, 2002
4,196
0
0
Maybe I'm just backwards ;). Could it be something else that bothers my eyes then? In Windows I have no problem but after a while in Linux it becomes an issue.

Thanks for your replies, I thought it was the higher the better...
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: GonzoDaGr8
I could not, for the life of me, tell you even *how* I would check that on my machines!

Unless you have older monitors, your monitors' on-screen display should be able to tell you what your current frequency setting is.

And how much does it really matter? I know 60 is bad because of florescent lights, atleast on CRTs. I thought I read its different for LCDs or something.
 

CTho9305

Elite Member
Jul 26, 2000
9,214
1
81
Originally posted by: oniq
Maybe I'm just backwards ;). Could it be something else that bothers my eyes then? In Windows I have no problem but after a while in Linux it becomes an issue.

Thanks for your replies, I thought it was the higher the better...

the ugly fonts? ;)

everything should only improve with refresh increase, unless you notice blurriness or something else is interfering wiht the signal.
 

Barnaby W. Füi

Elite Member
Aug 14, 2001
12,343
0
0
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: GonzoDaGr8
I could not, for the life of me, tell you even *how* I would check that on my machines!

Unless you have older monitors, your monitors' on-screen display should be able to tell you what your current frequency setting is.

And how much does it really matter? I know 60 is bad because of florescent lights, atleast on CRTs. I thought I read its different for LCDs or something.

lcd's dont have a refresh rate. a crt is a gun strobing light across the front of the tube X times per second, at 60hz, 60 times a second. an lcd is not a strobe, it's just constant voltage going to the individual pixels. that's why lcd's are easy on the eyes, you dont have a gun blasting light at your face ;)
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: GonzoDaGr8
I could not, for the life of me, tell you even *how* I would check that on my machines!

Unless you have older monitors, your monitors' on-screen display should be able to tell you what your current frequency setting is.

And how much does it really matter? I know 60 is bad because of florescent lights, atleast on CRTs. I thought I read its different for LCDs or something.

lcd's dont have a refresh rate. a crt is a gun strobing light across the front of the tube X times per second, at 60hz, 60 times a second. an lcd is not a strobe, it's just constant voltage going to the individual pixels. that's why lcd's are easy on the eyes, you dont have a gun blasting light at your face ;)

Makes sense. Ive got a 17" lcd at work, and the 12" lcd on the iBook. I barely touch the CRTs anymore :D
 

GonzoDaGr8

Platinum Member
Apr 29, 2001
2,183
1
0
Makes sense. Ive got a 17" lcd at work, and the 12" lcd on the iBook. I barely touch the CRTs anymore

Maybe I should break down and get an LCD..I know I sure as hell am getting tired of fvckin' around with this WinXP reffresh problem BS.
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: GonzoDaGr8
Makes sense. Ive got a 17" lcd at work, and the 12" lcd on the iBook. I barely touch the CRTs anymore

Maybe I should break down and get an LCD..I know I sure as hell am getting tired of fvckin' around with this WinXP reffresh problem BS.

An iBook or an AlBook could solve that ;)
 

GonzoDaGr8

Platinum Member
Apr 29, 2001
2,183
1
0
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: GonzoDaGr8
Makes sense. Ive got a 17" lcd at work, and the 12" lcd on the iBook. I barely touch the CRTs anymore

Maybe I should break down and get an LCD..I know I sure as hell am getting tired of fvckin' around with this WinXP reffresh problem BS.

An iBook or an AlBook could solve that ;)



:p