• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Link to "Marine shooting the prisoner" video...

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
v. Hope: To wish for something with expectation of its fulfillment. To expect and desire.

he: The "dumbass grunt"

fries: Slang. To undergo [/b]execution[/b] in an electric chair.
Anyone else have any different interpretations?
 
Originally posted by: b0mbrmanSo you're saying Conjur just hopes the Marine fries...

The end.

No matter what happens in the interim, Conjur's hopes will only be answered if we end up with a fried Marine.
Exactly, and anyone saying anything else, based only on what Conjur wrote, if flat out lying. If Conjur did not mean what he wrote, he should go back and edit for clarity.
Even if he does, it's pretty obvious to anyone who can read that he really does believe that.

 
Originally posted by: BBond
The bottom line is, our troops should never have been put in the position they are in in Iraq. Bush's unprovoked invasion was the mistake that led to all the death and destruction. Now, what exactly was the reason for all this mayhem???

Iraq is a terrifying place to live. People are in constant fear of being denounced as opponents of the
regime. They are encouraged to report on the activities of family and neighbours. The security services
can strike at any time. Arbitrary arrests and killings are commonplace. Between three and four million
Iraqis, about 15% of the population, have fled their homeland rather than live under Saddam
Hussein?s regime.These grave violations of human rights are not the work of a number of overzealousindividuals but the deliberate policy of the regime. Fear is Saddam?s chosen method for staying in power. This report, based on the testimony of Iraqi exiles, evidence gathered by UN rapporteurs and human rights organisations, and intelligence material, describes the human cost of Saddam Hussein?s control of Iraq. It examines in turn Iraq?s record on torture, the treatment of women,prison conditions, arbitrary and summary killings, the persecution of the Kurds and the Shia, the harassment of opposition figures outside Iraq and the occupation of Kuwait.

The United Nations Security Council and the UN Commission on Human Rights have repeatedly, over
many years, condemned Iraq?s human rights record. But Iraq continues to flout UN resolutions and to
ignore its international human rights commitments. On 19 April 2002, the UN Commission on Human
Rights passed a resolution drawing attention to ?the systematic, widespread and extremely grave
violations of human rights and of international humanitarian law by the Government of Iraq, resulting in
an all-pervasive repression and oppression sustained by broad-based discrimination and widespread
terror.?

Link
 
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: BBondAnother blatant misrepresentation. No one is 'wishing death on a Marine'. The Marine needs to face justice for allowing himself to be judge, jury, and executioner.
You need to realize that in war, things like this can happen. Sure, it may need to be investigated, but the bottom line is, once you are in a war, all the errors in judgement our guys make SHOULD go in favor or OUR guys.
Read up on the whole story and you may be a bit more understanding.
*may* need to be investigated????


😕
 
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: BBond
The bottom line is, our troops should never have been put in the position they are in in Iraq. Bush's unprovoked invasion was the mistake that led to all the death and destruction. Now, what exactly was the reason for all this mayhem???
<BS excuse snipped>
Try again, troll.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: BBondAnother blatant misrepresentation. No one is 'wishing death on a Marine'. The Marine needs to face justice for allowing himself to be judge, jury, and executioner.
You need to realize that in war, things like this can happen. Sure, it may need to be investigated, but the bottom line is, once you are in a war, all the errors in judgement our guys make SHOULD go in favor or OUR guys.
Read up on the whole story and you may be a bit more understanding.
*may* need to be investigated????


😕

"Fvcking dumbass grunt. Hope he fries"


😕

CsG
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: BBondAnother blatant misrepresentation. No one is 'wishing death on a Marine'. The Marine needs to face justice for allowing himself to be judge, jury, and executioner.
You need to realize that in war, things like this can happen. Sure, it may need to be investigated, but the bottom line is, once you are in a war, all the errors in judgement our guys make SHOULD go in favor or OUR guys.
Read up on the whole story and you may be a bit more understanding.
*may* need to be investigated????


😕

Originally posted by: alchemize
v. Hope: To wish for something with expectation of its fulfillment. To expect and desire.

he: The "dumbass grunt"

fries: Slang. To undergo [/b]execution[/b] in an electric chair.
Anyone else have any different interpretations?
 
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: BBondAnother blatant misrepresentation. No one is 'wishing death on a Marine'. The Marine needs to face justice for allowing himself to be judge, jury, and executioner.
You need to realize that in war, things like this can happen. Sure, it may need to be investigated, but the bottom line is, once you are in a war, all the errors in judgement our guys make SHOULD go in favor or OUR guys.
Read up on the whole story and you may be a bit more understanding.
*may* need to be investigated????


😕
"Fvcking dumbass grunt. Hope he fries"


😕

CsG
Suppose you hope he gets off scot-free, eh?
 
It's illegal to feign death to kill your enemy, it's illegal to booby trap dead bodies, it's illegal to surrender using a white and then fire and it's certainly immoral to use a place of worship as a military fortress.

Where's Conjur and his ilk decrying these insuregent behaviors?

Obviously, he'd rather condemn US soldiers without even knowing all of the facts.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: BBondAnother blatant misrepresentation. No one is 'wishing death on a Marine'. The Marine needs to face justice for allowing himself to be judge, jury, and executioner.
You need to realize that in war, things like this can happen. Sure, it may need to be investigated, but the bottom line is, once you are in a war, all the errors in judgement our guys make SHOULD go in favor or OUR guys.
Read up on the whole story and you may be a bit more understanding.
*may* need to be investigated????


😕
"Fvcking dumbass grunt. Hope he fries"


😕

CsG
Suppose you hope he gets off scot-free, eh?
I hope he's given a fair trial and, if found guilty, is punished accordingly
 
Originally posted by: Riprorin
It's illegal to feign death to kill your enemy, it's illegal to booby trap dead bodies, it's illegal to surrender using a white and then fire and it's certainly immoral to use a place of worship as a military fortress.

Where's Conjur and his ilk decrying these insuregent behaviors?

Obviously, he'd rather condemn US soldiers without even knowing all of the facts.

I bet you could search through every "beheading" and "car-bombing" post out there and never find a peep anywhere near this one from Conjur.
 
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: BBond
The bottom line is, our troops should never have been put in the position they are in in Iraq. Bush's unprovoked invasion was the mistake that led to all the death and destruction. Now, what exactly was the reason for all this mayhem???

Iraq is a terrifying place to live. People are in constant fear of being denounced as opponents of the
regime. They are encouraged to report on the activities of family and neighbours. The security services
can strike at any time. Arbitrary arrests and killings are commonplace. Between three and four million
Iraqis, about 15% of the population, have fled their homeland rather than live under Saddam
Hussein?s regime.These grave violations of human rights are not the work of a number of overzealousindividuals but the deliberate policy of the regime. Fear is Saddam?s chosen method for staying in power. This report, based on the testimony of Iraqi exiles, evidence gathered by UN rapporteurs and human rights organisations, and intelligence material, describes the human cost of Saddam Hussein?s control of Iraq. It examines in turn Iraq?s record on torture, the treatment of women,prison conditions, arbitrary and summary killings, the persecution of the Kurds and the Shia, the harassment of opposition figures outside Iraq and the occupation of Kuwait.

The United Nations Security Council and the UN Commission on Human Rights have repeatedly, over
many years, condemned Iraq?s human rights record. But Iraq continues to flout UN resolutions and to
ignore its international human rights commitments. On 19 April 2002, the UN Commission on Human
Rights passed a resolution drawing attention to ?the systematic, widespread and extremely grave
violations of human rights and of international humanitarian law by the Government of Iraq, resulting in
an all-pervasive repression and oppression sustained by broad-based discrimination and widespread
terror.?

Link

That is NOT the reason Bush gave America and the world for his unprovoked, illegal, immoral invasion of Iraq. To suggest he invaded Iraq on humanitarian grounds is to ignore the truth and insult the intelligence of every person who heard Bush and his administration repeat myriad times the necessity to immediately invade Iraq to destroy Saddam's WMDs when all the while Bush knew his evidence was based on outright fraud and years old evidence that was refuted by UN weapons inspectors who were on the ground in Iraq and telling Bush there were no weapons of mass destruction.

One other element in Bush's unprovoked invasion was his failure, his outright neglect, to plan for the aftermath of the inavsion which led directly to such actions as we are witnessing in Fallujah and all across Iraq.

 
Originally posted by: Riprorin
It's illegal to feign death to kill your enemy, it's illegal to booby trap dead bodies, it's illegal to surrender using a white and then fire and it's certainly immoral to use a place of worship as a military fortress.

Where's Conjur and his ilk decrying these insuregent behaviors?

Obviously, he'd rather condemn US soldiers without even knowing all of the facts.
When I first saw the movie Red Dawn, I felt that about every red-blooded American would act much as they did in that movie.

I see the insurgents as no different.
 
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: BBond
The bottom line is, our troops should never have been put in the position they are in in Iraq. Bush's unprovoked invasion was the mistake that led to all the death and destruction. Now, what exactly was the reason for all this mayhem???

Iraq is a terrifying place to live. People are in constant fear of being denounced as opponents of the
regime. They are encouraged to report on the activities of family and neighbours. The security services
can strike at any time. Arbitrary arrests and killings are commonplace. Between three and four million
Iraqis, about 15% of the population, have fled their homeland rather than live under Saddam
Hussein?s regime.These grave violations of human rights are not the work of a number of overzealousindividuals but the deliberate policy of the regime. Fear is Saddam?s chosen method for staying in power. This report, based on the testimony of Iraqi exiles, evidence gathered by UN rapporteurs and human rights organisations, and intelligence material, describes the human cost of Saddam Hussein?s control of Iraq. It examines in turn Iraq?s record on torture, the treatment of women,prison conditions, arbitrary and summary killings, the persecution of the Kurds and the Shia, the harassment of opposition figures outside Iraq and the occupation of Kuwait.

The United Nations Security Council and the UN Commission on Human Rights have repeatedly, over
many years, condemned Iraq?s human rights record. But Iraq continues to flout UN resolutions and to
ignore its international human rights commitments. On 19 April 2002, the UN Commission on Human
Rights passed a resolution drawing attention to ?the systematic, widespread and extremely grave
violations of human rights and of international humanitarian law by the Government of Iraq, resulting in
an all-pervasive repression and oppression sustained by broad-based discrimination and widespread
terror.?

Link

That is NOT the reason Bush gave America and the world for his unprovoked, illegal, immoral invasion of Iraq. To suggest he invaded Iraq on humanitarian grounds is to ignore the truth and insult the intelligence of every person who heard Bush and his administration repeat myriad times the necessity to immediately invade Iraq to destroy Saddam's WMDs when all the while Bush knew his evidence was based on outright fraud and years old evidence that was refuted by UN weapons inspectors who were on the ground in Iraq and telling Bush there were no weapons of mass destruction.

One other element in Bush's unprovoked invasion was his failure, his outright neglect, to plan for the aftermath of the inavsion which led directly to such actions as we are witnessing in Fallujah and all across Iraq.
Shhhh...don't let the truth obfuscate things.
 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Riprorin
It's illegal to feign death to kill your enemy, it's illegal to booby trap dead bodies, it's illegal to surrender using a white and then fire and it's certainly immoral to use a place of worship as a military fortress.

Where's Conjur and his ilk decrying these insuregent behaviors?

Obviously, he'd rather condemn US soldiers without even knowing all of the facts.

I bet you could search through every "beheading" and "car-bombing" post out there and never find a peep anywhere near this one from Conjur.

In a world where the policies and actions of the Bush administration have sunk U.S. standing to an all time low, I am more concerned with the actions of Americans during Bush's unprovoked invasion of Iraq. We police ourselves. We tell the world we are better than murdering dictators. We tout ourselves as the world's beacon of freedom and democracy. We cannot sink to the level of car bombers and terrorists, killing civilians, children and women for God's sake, and expect the world not to call us hypocirtes and worse.

 
I'm the last person who would ever pass judgement on one of our soldiers. I have no idea what happened to these guys earlier in the day. Maybe they stumbled across some others who were playing dead and ended up trying to toss a 'nade in their general direction or maybe they saw something similar in a different mosque that almost turned catastrophic. Hell, maybe they just lost five other Marines in a fire fight an hour ago and wanted revenge.

That is why I will most certainly wait for an investigation's results before ever presuming to know what really happened there. I don't presume to know what it's like to be in the mind of a soldier who is going through what those guys are going through who are in Fallujah right now. And shame on any of the rest of you who have not been in combat and think you have the insight to understand a person's mindset who is there. To us this is just another movie. We can try to personalize it simply because we know that it is real, but in the end it is just another moving picture on our television set with no true emotion attached (assuming you haven't lost any loved ones).
 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Starting to get some details around this.

- He was shot the previous day but returned to duty
- A soldier was killed the previous day by a booby-trapped insurgent body

Hope it isn't too late to commute his death sentence.

And again, the reason our troops are stretched so thin, their tours extended, their stress level so high, is the absolute incompetence and failure of the Bush administration to plan for the aftermath of their unprovoked attack on Iraq. All based on false evidence presented to America as a do or die necessity.

I blame every atrocity, every civilian death, every child missing a limb, disfigured for life or dead on George W. Bush and the band of neocon madmen who sent our troops into this hell hole of Bush's making.

 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: BBondAnother blatant misrepresentation. No one is 'wishing death on a Marine'. The Marine needs to face justice for allowing himself to be judge, jury, and executioner.
You need to realize that in war, things like this can happen. Sure, it may need to be investigated, but the bottom line is, once you are in a war, all the errors in judgement our guys make SHOULD go in favor or OUR guys.
Read up on the whole story and you may be a bit more understanding.
*may* need to be investigated????


😕
"Fvcking dumbass grunt. Hope he fries"


😕

CsG
Suppose you hope he gets off scot-free, eh?

Have you also lost your ability to read since your mables went scattering across the floor?

We don't know the whole story yet, so I'll reserve judgement until we find out more. However it looks like you and others hope he "fries" before we get all the info.
*shrugs*

Like b0mbrman - I hope that this incident is investigated - and IF the investigation warrants a trial - I hope the Marine gets a fair hearing. Then - IF convicted of a crime he should be punished.

CsG
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: alchemize
Starting to get some details around this.

- He was shot the previous day but returned to duty
- A soldier was killed the previous day by a booby-trapped insurgent body as this was happening

Hope it isn't too late to commute his death sentence.
Fixed your post for you to reflect what was actually reported in that video.
"As this was happening"? Right before that, same sentence, it said "the previous day". If a soldier was killed the previous day, it couldn't be "as this was happening".
Nice try, but wrong again.

 
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Riprorin
It's illegal to feign death to kill your enemy, it's illegal to booby trap dead bodies, it's illegal to surrender using a white and then fire and it's certainly immoral to use a place of worship as a military fortress.

Where's Conjur and his ilk decrying these insuregent behaviors?

Obviously, he'd rather condemn US soldiers without even knowing all of the facts.

I bet you could search through every "beheading" and "car-bombing" post out there and never find a peep anywhere near this one from Conjur.

In a world where the policies and actions of the Bush administration have sunk U.S. standing to an all time low, I am more concerned with the actions of Americans during Bush's unprovoked invasion of Iraq. We police ourselves. We tell the world we are better than murdering dictators. We tout ourselves as the world's beacon of freedom and democracy. We cannot sink to the level of car bombers and terrorists, killing civilians, children and women for God's sake, and expect the world not to call us hypocirtes and worse.
Ignoring your anti-bush diatribe, in general terms I agree. Of course, this man didn't kill a child, civilian, or woman. He killed a wounded insurgent in a war zone.

But, put yourself in the guys shoes (see previous post). He's been killing insurgents for the past X days. He's probably seen his friends die/wounded by cheap insurgent tactics. He's been shot the previous day. Bodies are being booby-trapped. As a trained killer, if you saw someone stirring as you "cleared" a house, would you sit tight and think about the geneva convention? Or would you wonder if he had a bomb-belt strapped to himself? Unfortunately, he killed the man. War is a horrible horrible thing. I feel badly for this marine, his life is probably ruined. I don't feel too sad for a wounded insurgent holed up in a MOSQUE. Did he deserve to die? I try not to pass judgement on who deserves to die. But I'll take a life of one of my countrymen over a scumbag insurgent anyday.


Still waiting for your analysis of this one, BBOND:

v. Hope: To wish for something with expectation of its fulfillment. To expect and desire.

he: The "dumbass grunt"

fries: Slang. To undergo execution in an electric chair.
 
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: BBond
The bottom line is, our troops should never have been put in the position they are in in Iraq. Bush's unprovoked invasion was the mistake that led to all the death and destruction. Now, what exactly was the reason for all this mayhem???

Iraq is a terrifying place to live. People are in constant fear of being denounced as opponents of the
regime. They are encouraged to report on the activities of family and neighbours. The security services
can strike at any time. Arbitrary arrests and killings are commonplace. Between three and four million
Iraqis, about 15% of the population, have fled their homeland rather than live under Saddam
Hussein?s regime.These grave violations of human rights are not the work of a number of overzealousindividuals but the deliberate policy of the regime. Fear is Saddam?s chosen method for staying in power. This report, based on the testimony of Iraqi exiles, evidence gathered by UN rapporteurs and human rights organisations, and intelligence material, describes the human cost of Saddam Hussein?s control of Iraq. It examines in turn Iraq?s record on torture, the treatment of women,prison conditions, arbitrary and summary killings, the persecution of the Kurds and the Shia, the harassment of opposition figures outside Iraq and the occupation of Kuwait.

The United Nations Security Council and the UN Commission on Human Rights have repeatedly, over
many years, condemned Iraq?s human rights record. But Iraq continues to flout UN resolutions and to
ignore its international human rights commitments. On 19 April 2002, the UN Commission on Human
Rights passed a resolution drawing attention to ?the systematic, widespread and extremely grave
violations of human rights and of international humanitarian law by the Government of Iraq, resulting in
an all-pervasive repression and oppression sustained by broad-based discrimination and widespread
terror.?

Link

That is NOT the reason Bush gave America and the world for his unprovoked, illegal, immoral invasion of Iraq. To suggest he invaded Iraq on humanitarian grounds is to ignore the truth and insult the intelligence of every person who heard Bush and his administration repeat myriad times the necessity to immediately invade Iraq to destroy Saddam's WMDs when all the while Bush knew his evidence was based on outright fraud and years old evidence that was refuted by UN weapons inspectors who were on the ground in Iraq and telling Bush there were no weapons of mass destruction.

One other element in Bush's unprovoked invasion was his failure, his outright neglect, to plan for the aftermath of the inavsion which led directly to such actions as we are witnessing in Fallujah and all across Iraq.

Death, destruction, and mayhem was the way of life for Iraqis under Saddam. For some reason you've chosen to conveniently ignore that. At least the Iraqis will now have the chance for freedom and democracy. That didn't exist while Saddam was inpwer.
 
Back
Top