Limbaugh takes a stand: gets hard over Obama

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: newnameman

The ad claims Obama wants to teach sex education to kindergarteners. According to Barack Obama, "'Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners." What exactly do you find unfair?

The ad lies. It's already been debunked.

It's rather sad that some McCain supporters can't bring themselves to admit that, but rather attempt to keep distorting....

so sad...

:D

/still never got a yes or no answer out some folks.....
 

fallout man

Golden Member
Nov 20, 2007
1,787
1
0
The dialogue here is deviating off-topic rather quickly.

This thread is about how Rush Limbaugh is a fat-fuck lowest-common-denominator troll who needs Viagra to make even kinky Asian sex-tourism arousing.
 

newnameman

Platinum Member
Nov 20, 2002
2,219
0
0
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: newnameman

The ad claims Obama wants to teach sex education to kindergarteners. According to Barack Obama, "'Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners." What exactly do you find unfair?

The ad lies. It's already been debunked.

"'Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners,'" said Obama
You don't accept Obama's own words?
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Originally posted by: newnameman
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: newnameman

The ad claims Obama wants to teach sex education to kindergarteners. According to Barack Obama, "'Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners." What exactly do you find unfair?

The ad lies. It's already been debunked.

"'Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners,'" said Obama
You don't accept Obama's own words?

What do you feel was the point of the ad?
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,058
70
91
Originally posted by: fallout man
The dialogue here is deviating off-topic rather quickly.

This thread is about how Rush Limbaugh is a fat-fuck lowest-common-denominator troll who needs Viagra to make even kinky Asian sex-tourism arousing.

Everyone knows that, except maybe Rush, but thanks for the reminder and for bringing it back on track. :thumbsup: :cool:
 

Butterbean

Banned
Oct 12, 2006
918
1
0
Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: newnameman

The ad claims Obama wants to teach sex education to kindergarteners. According to Barack Obama, "'Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners." What exactly do you find unfair?

The ad lies. It's already been debunked.

It's rather sad that some McCain supporters can't bring themselves to admit that, but rather attempt to keep distorting....

so sad...

:D

/still never got a yes or no answer out some folks.....


Its true that BO wants to use SIECUS guidelines to teach kids of 6 masterbation and homosexuality and gender dysphoria. His own campaign gave SEICUS as a model:


Recently Obama spokesman Bill Burton recently called kiddie sex ed charge "shameful and downright perverse". But last year the same Bill Burton was in the news concerning Obama's plans:

"Obama spokesman Bill Burton tells First Read: "You can teach a kid about what's appropriate and not appropriate to protect them from predators out there." In addition, he issued a document showing that the Oregon Department of Education has guidelines for sex education for children in grades K-3 (which includes understanding the difference between a good touch and a bad touch), and that the Sexuality Information And Education Council of the United States has curriculum those in kindergarten."

There you are - SIECUS.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com...2007/07/19/277886.aspx

Obama's campaign has cited them before. Indeed, Obama's larger church called the United Church of Christ (Trinity was a congregation in the larger church) also uses SIECUS in a plan called "Our Whole Lives"

http://www.ucc.org/justice/sex...n/our-whole-lives.html


Nobody can read SIECUS guidelines and not see it teaches 5 yr olds about masturbating, homosexuality and gender dysphoria as normal. That a campaign would even mention then as an source for 5 yr olds is pretty whacked.


The below are some of the things the "church" teachs in "level 1" sex education for kids 4 to 6 (there are 5 others levels after level 1)

? Human beings can love people of the same gender and people of another gender.
? Some people are heterosexual, which means they can be attracted to and fall in love with someoneof another gender.
? Some people are homosexual, which means they can be attracted to and fall in love with someone of the same gender.
? Homosexual men and women are also known as gay men and lesbians.
? People deserve respect regardless of who they are attracted to.
? Making fun of people by calling them gay (e.g. ?homo,? ?i love you,? ?queer?) is disrespectful and hurtful.
? A family consists of two or more people who care for eachother in many ways
? There are different kinds of families.
? Children may live with one or more parents or caregivers including biological parents, step-parents, foster parents, adoptive parents, grandparents, friends, or other combinations of adults.
? Many adults may help care for children.
? Family members show love for each other.
? Love means having deep and warm feelings about oneself and others.
? People can experience different types of love.
? People express love differently to their parents, families, and friends.
? Touching and rubbing one?s own genitals to feel good is called masturbation

People often kiss, hug, touch, and engage in other sexual behaviors with one another to show caringand to feel good.

Both girls and boys may discover that their bodies feel good when touched

? Girls and boys have many similarities and a few differences.
? Some people may expect or demand that boys and girls behave in certain ways, but this is beginning to change.
? Both women and men can be involved and caring parents.
? Boys and girls can do the same chores at home.
? Men and women are capable of doing almost all the same jobs.
? Some men and women may be told that certain jobs and tasks are only for women or only for men, but this is beginning to change.

Later on teens get to Level 6 (and I dont think for a minute they really wait to expose kids to all the "levels") which is obviously political in nature to advance the set agenda:

"Society and Culture Life Behaviors:
Having applied the society and culture subconcepts at the
appropriate age, the learner will be able to:

? Demonstrate respect for people with different sexual values.
? Exercise democratic responsibility to influence legislation dealing with sexual issues.
? Assess the impact of family, cultural, media, and societal messages on one?s thoughts, feelings, values, and behaviors related to
sexuality.
? Critically examine the world around them for biases based on gender, sexual orientation, culture, ethnicity, and race.
? Promote the rights of all people to accurate sexuality information.
? Avoid behaviors that exhibit prejudice and bigotry.
? Reject stereotypes about the sexuality of different populations.
? Educate others about sexuality."

http://www.siecus.org/_data/gl.../images/guidelines.pdf

The guidelines are a holler to read because in between teaching things like how 5 yr olds can touch themselves to "feel good" they insert little benign nothings like eating yogurt for good health. It's hysterical

SIECUS is brainwashing for kiddies. Obama would enact the very things his own people are calling perverse.
 

newnameman

Platinum Member
Nov 20, 2002
2,219
0
0
Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Originally posted by: newnameman
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: newnameman

The ad claims Obama wants to teach sex education to kindergarteners. According to Barack Obama, "'Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners." What exactly do you find unfair?

The ad lies. It's already been debunked.

"'Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners,'" said Obama
You don't accept Obama's own words?

What do you feel was the point of the ad?
That Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners.

 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Originally posted by: Butterbean

SIECUS is brainwashing for kiddies. Obama would enact the very things his own people are calling perverse.

ah, so teaching children, warning them about sex predators is perverse....

 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Well one thing for sure, we will hear all about it on tomorrow's Rush Limbaugh show.

And here, for all these years, us dimocrats have been on mere probation, as Rush has kindly offered us the reeducation option, with a chance to enroll of his institute of advanced conservative studies.

And damn and double damn, I was just struggling to get by the preparatory prerequisites of remedial conservative studies.

But now we will see as the man who is on loan from God tells God, and takes the gloves off, and will soon be hurling fatal lightning bolts around, and will not even offer us benefit of clergy or redemption before he consigns all us dimocrats to hell.

Please massa Rush, I did not do it. Please give us another chance.
 

Butterbean

Banned
Oct 12, 2006
918
1
0
And Obama absolutely twisted limbaughs words to incite race tension. Obama has always been a phony though and his helps cement that. Hes a mean fellow - no surprise since he would leave live born babies injured in abortions left to die. Baby killing and masterbation lessons for 5 year olds - that your Obama for ya. A race bait add is small beans
 

Mani

Diamond Member
Aug 9, 2001
4,808
1
0
Originally posted by: Butterbean
And Obama absolutely twisted limbaughs words to incite race tension. Obama has always been a phony though and his helps cement that. Hes a mean fellow - no surprise since he would leave live born babies injured in abortions left to die. Baby killing and masterbation lessons for 5 year olds - that your Obama for ya. A race bait add is small beans

Rush Limbaugh has made a living on fomenting racial tension and distrust. I'm not shedding any tears for him.
 

Butterbean

Banned
Oct 12, 2006
918
1
0
Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Originally posted by: Butterbean

SIECUS is brainwashing for kiddies. Obama would enact the very things his own people are calling perverse.

ah, so teaching children, warning them about sex predators is perverse....


Thats' just an excuse an even you know it. How many minutes would it take to teach the kiddies about "good touch/bad touch"? Maybe five? Maybe 20? Obviously there would not need a whole program. The "stranger danger" facead is just the trojan horse. All the pervy groups hide behind the old "its for the children" rubbish. Obama is a weirdo. SIECUS is what it is and its garbage.

 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
Originally posted by: Butterbean
Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: newnameman

The ad claims Obama wants to teach sex education to kindergarteners. According to Barack Obama, "'Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners." What exactly do you find unfair?

The ad lies. It's already been debunked.

It's rather sad that some McCain supporters can't bring themselves to admit that, but rather attempt to keep distorting....

so sad...

:D

/still never got a yes or no answer out some folks.....


Its true that BO wants to use SIECUS guidelines to teach kids of 6 masterbation and homosexuality and gender dysphoria. His own campaign gave SEICUS as a model:


Recently Obama spokesman Bill Burton recently called kiddie sex ed charge "shameful and downright perverse". But last year the same Bill Burton was in the news concerning Obama's plans:

"Obama spokesman Bill Burton tells First Read: "You can teach a kid about what's appropriate and not appropriate to protect them from predators out there." In addition, he issued a document showing that the Oregon Department of Education has guidelines for sex education for children in grades K-3 (which includes understanding the difference between a good touch and a bad touch), and that the Sexuality Information And Education Council of the United States has curriculum those in kindergarten."

There you are - SIECUS.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com...2007/07/19/277886.aspx

Obama's campaign has cited them before. Indeed, Obama's larger church called the United Church of Christ (Trinity was a congregation in the larger church) also uses SIECUS in a plan called "Our Whole Lives"

http://www.ucc.org/justice/sex...n/our-whole-lives.html


Nobody can read SIECUS guidelines and not see it teaches 5 yr olds about masturbating, homosexuality and gender dysphoria as normal. That a campaign would even mention then as an source for 5 yr olds is pretty whacked.


The below are some of the things the "church" teachs in "level 1" sex education for kids 4 to 6 (there are 5 others levels after level 1)

? Human beings can love people of the same gender and people of another gender.
? Some people are heterosexual, which means they can be attracted to and fall in love with someoneof another gender.
? Some people are homosexual, which means they can be attracted to and fall in love with someone of the same gender.
? Homosexual men and women are also known as gay men and lesbians.
? People deserve respect regardless of who they are attracted to.
? Making fun of people by calling them gay (e.g. ?homo,? ?i love you,? ?queer?) is disrespectful and hurtful.
? A family consists of two or more people who care for eachother in many ways
? There are different kinds of families.
? Children may live with one or more parents or caregivers including biological parents, step-parents, foster parents, adoptive parents, grandparents, friends, or other combinations of adults.
? Many adults may help care for children.
? Family members show love for each other.
? Love means having deep and warm feelings about oneself and others.
? People can experience different types of love.
? People express love differently to their parents, families, and friends.
? Touching and rubbing one?s own genitals to feel good is called masturbation

People often kiss, hug, touch, and engage in other sexual behaviors with one another to show caringand to feel good.

Both girls and boys may discover that their bodies feel good when touched

? Girls and boys have many similarities and a few differences.
? Some people may expect or demand that boys and girls behave in certain ways, but this is beginning to change.
? Both women and men can be involved and caring parents.
? Boys and girls can do the same chores at home.
? Men and women are capable of doing almost all the same jobs.
? Some men and women may be told that certain jobs and tasks are only for women or only for men, but this is beginning to change.

Later on teens get to Level 6 (and I dont think for a minute they really wait to expose kids to all the "levels") which is obviously political in nature to advance the set agenda:

"Society and Culture Life Behaviors:
Having applied the society and culture subconcepts at the
appropriate age, the learner will be able to:

? Demonstrate respect for people with different sexual values.
? Exercise democratic responsibility to influence legislation dealing with sexual issues.
? Assess the impact of family, cultural, media, and societal messages on one?s thoughts, feelings, values, and behaviors related to
sexuality.
? Critically examine the world around them for biases based on gender, sexual orientation, culture, ethnicity, and race.
? Promote the rights of all people to accurate sexuality information.
? Avoid behaviors that exhibit prejudice and bigotry.
? Reject stereotypes about the sexuality of different populations.
? Educate others about sexuality."

http://www.siecus.org/_data/gl.../images/guidelines.pdf

The guidelines are a holler to read because in between teaching things like how 5 yr olds can touch themselves to "feel good" they insert little benign nothings like eating yogurt for good health. It's hysterical

SIECUS is brainwashing for kiddies. Obama would enact the very things his own people are calling perverse.
oh my god this cut/paste job of yours was totally debunked in previous threads.

yest you STILL cling to your trashy talkingpoints.

Thats very bad...bad bad bad bad

you are WRONG. and you are PERPETUATING LIES.

 

fallout man

Golden Member
Nov 20, 2007
1,787
1
0
Originally posted by: Butterbean

<usual bat-shit-crazy>

Butterbean--you need a hug, man. Of course, it probably shouldn't be a hug from a man, because that might be kind of gay.
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
Originally posted by: newnameman
Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Originally posted by: newnameman
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: newnameman

The ad claims Obama wants to teach sex education to kindergarteners. According to Barack Obama, "'Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners." What exactly do you find unfair?

The ad lies. It's already been debunked.

"'Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners,'" said Obama
You don't accept Obama's own words?

What do you feel was the point of the ad?
That Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners.

Lets take a different approach.

Yes you are absolutely right. Obama wants to teach sex education to kindergartners.

whats wrong with that in your opinion?
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Originally posted by: fallout man
Originally posted by: Butterbean

<usual bat-shit-crazy>

Butterbean--you need a hug, man. Of course, it probably shouldn't be a hug from a man, because that might be kind of gay.

Hey, he may have a van with a "free candy" sign on it - and Obama is going to cut off BB's business...
 

Butterbean

Banned
Oct 12, 2006
918
1
0
Originally posted by: Mani
Originally posted by: Butterbean
And Obama absolutely twisted limbaughs words to incite race tension. Obama has always been a phony though and his helps cement that. Hes a mean fellow - no surprise since he would leave live born babies injured in abortions left to die. Baby killing and masterbation lessons for 5 year olds - that your Obama for ya. A race bait add is small beans

Rush Limbaugh has made a living on fomenting racial tension and distrust. I'm not shedding any tears for him.


Who cares about Rush? He can take care of himself - no tears needed. I am just highlighting Obama's street hack tactics (same ones he used in Chicago) . There was never anything new about Kid Sunshine except the degree of his radical Marxism. Obama couldn't hold a candle to Rush.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: UberNeuman
So, I'll ask you - do you think the McCain ad was fair?

a yes or no answer will do......
I have not heard the ad, but I am of the belief that there was no reason to run it.

Apparently the ad is 'technically' correct. But it still twists the meaning of the Obama law and changes the context of it.

I would say the ad is no worse than Obama taking McCain's 100 years in Iraq line and twisting it was well.

And I would say that this ad is worse than both of them because it twists what Rush says and it ignores the fact that Rush has nothing to do with McCain.

Also, Obama seems to forget that when we play the association game, like the experience game, he losses. I'll put the words of Rush against the words of Wright any day of the week.
 

Butterbean

Banned
Oct 12, 2006
918
1
0
Originally posted by: OrByte
Originally posted by: Butterbean
Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: newnameman

The ad claims Obama wants to teach sex education to kindergarteners. According to Barack Obama, "'Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners." What exactly do you find unfair?

The ad lies. It's already been debunked.

It's rather sad that some McCain supporters can't bring themselves to admit that, but rather attempt to keep distorting....

so sad...

:D

/still never got a yes or no answer out some folks.....


Its true that BO wants to use SIECUS guidelines to teach kids of 6 masterbation and homosexuality and gender dysphoria. His own campaign gave SEICUS as a model:


Recently Obama spokesman Bill Burton recently called kiddie sex ed charge "shameful and downright perverse". But last year the same Bill Burton was in the news concerning Obama's plans:

"Obama spokesman Bill Burton tells First Read: "You can teach a kid about what's appropriate and not appropriate to protect them from predators out there." In addition, he issued a document showing that the Oregon Department of Education has guidelines for sex education for children in grades K-3 (which includes understanding the difference between a good touch and a bad touch), and that the Sexuality Information And Education Council of the United States has curriculum those in kindergarten."

There you are - SIECUS.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com...2007/07/19/277886.aspx

Obama's campaign has cited them before. Indeed, Obama's larger church called the United Church of Christ (Trinity was a congregation in the larger church) also uses SIECUS in a plan called "Our Whole Lives"

http://www.ucc.org/justice/sex...n/our-whole-lives.html


Nobody can read SIECUS guidelines and not see it teaches 5 yr olds about masturbating, homosexuality and gender dysphoria as normal. That a campaign would even mention then as an source for 5 yr olds is pretty whacked.


The below are some of the things the "church" teachs in "level 1" sex education for kids 4 to 6 (there are 5 others levels after level 1)

? Human beings can love people of the same gender and people of another gender.
? Some people are heterosexual, which means they can be attracted to and fall in love with someoneof another gender.
? Some people are homosexual, which means they can be attracted to and fall in love with someone of the same gender.
? Homosexual men and women are also known as gay men and lesbians.
? People deserve respect regardless of who they are attracted to.
? Making fun of people by calling them gay (e.g. ?homo,? ?i love you,? ?queer?) is disrespectful and hurtful.
? A family consists of two or more people who care for eachother in many ways
? There are different kinds of families.
? Children may live with one or more parents or caregivers including biological parents, step-parents, foster parents, adoptive parents, grandparents, friends, or other combinations of adults.
? Many adults may help care for children.
? Family members show love for each other.
? Love means having deep and warm feelings about oneself and others.
? People can experience different types of love.
? People express love differently to their parents, families, and friends.
? Touching and rubbing one?s own genitals to feel good is called masturbation

People often kiss, hug, touch, and engage in other sexual behaviors with one another to show caringand to feel good.

Both girls and boys may discover that their bodies feel good when touched

? Girls and boys have many similarities and a few differences.
? Some people may expect or demand that boys and girls behave in certain ways, but this is beginning to change.
? Both women and men can be involved and caring parents.
? Boys and girls can do the same chores at home.
? Men and women are capable of doing almost all the same jobs.
? Some men and women may be told that certain jobs and tasks are only for women or only for men, but this is beginning to change.

Later on teens get to Level 6 (and I dont think for a minute they really wait to expose kids to all the "levels") which is obviously political in nature to advance the set agenda:

"Society and Culture Life Behaviors:
Having applied the society and culture subconcepts at the
appropriate age, the learner will be able to:

? Demonstrate respect for people with different sexual values.
? Exercise democratic responsibility to influence legislation dealing with sexual issues.
? Assess the impact of family, cultural, media, and societal messages on one?s thoughts, feelings, values, and behaviors related to
sexuality.
? Critically examine the world around them for biases based on gender, sexual orientation, culture, ethnicity, and race.
? Promote the rights of all people to accurate sexuality information.
? Avoid behaviors that exhibit prejudice and bigotry.
? Reject stereotypes about the sexuality of different populations.
? Educate others about sexuality."

http://www.siecus.org/_data/gl.../images/guidelines.pdf

The guidelines are a holler to read because in between teaching things like how 5 yr olds can touch themselves to "feel good" they insert little benign nothings like eating yogurt for good health. It's hysterical

SIECUS is brainwashing for kiddies. Obama would enact the very things his own people are calling perverse.
oh my god this cut/paste job of yours was totally debunked in previous threads.

yest you STILL cling to your trashy talkingpoints.

Thats very bad...bad bad bad bad

you are WRONG. and you are PERPETUATING LIES.


It's NEVER been debunked here. The threads and posters just quietly go away *winks*
 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
Originally posted by: Harvey

Ad on Sex Education Distorts Obama Policy

By LARRY ROHTER
Published: September 10, 2008

Escalating its efforts to portray Senator Barack Obama as a candidate whose values fall outside the mainstream, the campaign of Senator John McCain on Tuesday unveiled a new television advertisement claiming that Mr. Obama, the Democratic nominee, favors ?comprehensive sex education? for kindergarten students.

?Learning about sex before learning to read?? the narrator asks in the 30-second advertisement, which the campaign says will be shown in battleground states and on national cable. The commercial also asserts that a sex-education bill introduced in Illinois, which Mr. Obama did not sponsor and which never became law, is his ?one accomplishment? in the field of education.

Both sets of accusations, however, seriously distort the record.

The original controversy dates to 2003, when a bill to modify the teaching of sex education in Illinois was introduced in the Legislature. The proposal was supported by a coalition of education and public health organizations, including the Illinois Parent Teacher Association, the Illinois State Medical Society, the Illinois Public Health Association and the Illinois Education Association.

Mr. Obama voted for the bill in committee, where it passed, but it never came to a full and final vote. The proposal called for ?age and developmentally appropriate? sex education and also allowed parents the option of withdrawing their children from such classroom instruction if they felt that it clashed with their beliefs or values.

In referring to the sex-education bill, the McCain campaign is largely recycling old and discredited accusations made against Mr. Obama by Alan Keyes in their 2004 Senate race. At that time, Mr. Obama stated that he understood the main objective of the legislation, as it pertained to kindergarteners, to be to teach them how to defend themselves against sexual predators.

?I have a 6-year-old daughter and a 3-year-old daughter, and one of the things my wife and I talked to our daughter about is the possibility of somebody touching them inappropriately, and what that might mean,? Mr. Obama said in 2004. ?And that was included specifically in the law, so that kindergarteners are able to exercise some possible protection against abuse, because I have family members as well as friends who suffered abuse at that age.?

It is a misstatement of the bill?s purpose, therefore, to maintain, as the McCain campaign advertisement does, that Mr. Obama favored conventional sex education as a policy for 5-year-olds. Under the Illinois proposal, ?medically accurate? education about more complicated topics, including intercourse, contraception and homosexuality, would have been reserved for older students in higher grades.

The advertisement, then, also misrepresents what the bill meant by ?comprehensive.? The instruction the bill required was comprehensive in that it called for a curriculum that went from kindergarten and through high school, not in the sense that kindergarteners would have been fully exposed to the entire gamut of sex-related issues.
.
.
(continues)


An excellent defense of the subject. A lot of conjecture on contrived on the spot theorems to support the writers position given the lack of specificity in the bill itself.



a new television advertisement claiming that Mr. Obama favors ?comprehensive sex education? for kindergarten students.

?Learning about sex before learning to read??

Both sets of accusations, however, seriously distort the record.


Except the first statement, in addition to being the actual language of the bill, was said by bho on at least 2 public speaking occasions. He has since added additional rhetoric when speaking on the subject, and the fact that he needs to do so validates that part of the ad and the critics of the original bill in the vagueness of the legislation.

If you want to fight over the 2nd line, fell free and have fun, I'm sure none of the ads from the dems would contain such language to make one appear more sensational. Isn't that right baby alex.


It is a misstatement of the bill?s purpose

It is a misstatement to specify what the bills purpose would be as all that matters is the legal requirements that would be made be once passed. The proposal was to mark through the line that had "6-12 sex ed instruction" and make it read "K-12" with no additional notation made giving instruction upon the effects of that change.


The advertisement, then, also misrepresents what the bill meant by ?comprehensive.? The instruction the bill required was comprehensive in that it called for a curriculum that went from kindergarten and through high school, not in the sense that kindergarteners would have been fully exposed to the entire gamut of sex-related issues.


As beauty is in the eye of the beholder, the meaning of this also lays since there was no clarity given to coincide with the age reduction. Again, this is the reason it drew so many local critics and the reason it was never passed.


but please, continue stating things as being "fact checked" when the reason the legislation was killed was its lack of comprehensive discussion.
 

Sinsear

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2007
6,439
80
91
Newsflash: Politicians stretch the truth and use soundbites and edited quotes in commercials.

And who really cares what Rush Limbaugh says?
 

newnameman

Platinum Member
Nov 20, 2002
2,219
0
0
Originally posted by: OrByte
Originally posted by: newnameman
Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Originally posted by: newnameman
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: newnameman

The ad claims Obama wants to teach sex education to kindergarteners. According to Barack Obama, "'Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners." What exactly do you find unfair?

The ad lies. It's already been debunked.

"'Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners,'" said Obama
You don't accept Obama's own words?

What do you feel was the point of the ad?
That Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners.

Lets take a different approach.

Yes you are absolutely right. Obama wants to teach sex education to kindergartners.

whats wrong with that in your opinion?
So you admit the ad is accurate?