Levin: Memos don't show what Cheney says they do

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
No big surprise here. Cheney will say or do anything to defend his idiotic policies. Is there any other possibility? Srsly?

Levin: Memos don't show what Cheney says they do

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, says former Vice President Dick Cheney's claims -- that classified CIA memos show enhanced interrogation techniques like waterboarding worked -- are wrong.

Levin, speaking at the Foreign Policy Association's annual dinner in New York on Wednesday, said an investigation by his committee into detainee abuse charges over the use of the techniques -- now deemed torture by the Obama administration -- "gives the lie to Mr. Cheney's claims."


The Michigan Democrat told the crowd that the two CIA documents that Cheney wants released "say nothing about numbers of lives saved, nor do the documents connect acquisition of valuable intelligence to the use of abusive techniques."

"I hope that the documents are declassified, so that people can judge for themselves what is fact, and what is fiction," he added.

Justice Department documents released in April showed that Bush administration lawyers authorized the use of techniques such as sleep deprivation, slapping, stress positions and waterboarding, which produces the sensation of drowning.

President Obama formally banned the techniques by issuing an executive order requiring that the U.S. Army field manual be used as the guide for terror interrogations. Watch Obama discuss the torture debate »

"I can stand here tonight and say without exception or equivocation that the United States of America does not torture," he told a joint session of Congress in February.

Cheney, who has become a vocal public defender of the Bush administration's controversial interrogation policies, had asked the Obama administration to declassify the documents so there can be a more "honest debate" on the Bush administration's decision to use them on suspected terrorists.

He argued that those techniques provided valuable intelligence that saved American lives, but critics say they amounted to the illegal torture of prisoners in U.S. custody

On May 14, the CIA rejected the former vice president's request.

CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano, in a written statement, said the two documents Cheney requested are the subject of two pending lawsuits seeking the release of documents related to the interrogation program, and cannot be declassified.

A former State Department official has told CNN that the main purpose of the Bush-era interrogations was finding a link between Iraq and al Qaeda.

Lawrence Wilkerson, chief of staff for then-Secretary of State Colin Powell, said that the interrogation program began in April and May of 2002, and Cheney's office kept close tabs on the questioning.

"Its principal priority for intelligence was not aimed at preempting another terrorist attack on the U.S. but discovering a smoking gun linking Iraq and al Qaeda," Wilkerson wrote in The Washington Note, an online political journal.

Wilkerson, a retired Army colonel, said his accusation is based on information from current and former officials. He said he has been "relentlessly digging" since 2004, when Powell asked him to look into the scandal surrounding the treatment of prisoners at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison.

Speaking before the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, on May 21, Cheney said only detainees of the "highest intelligence value" were subjected to enhanced interrogation techniques. He said only three detainees were waterboarded.

Bush administration lawyers have said the interrogation tactics did not violate U.S. laws against torture as long as interrogators had no intent to cause "severe pain."

With thousands of lives potentially in the balance, Cheney argued, it didn't make sense to let high-value detainees "answer questions in their own good time."

Obama, speaking on the same day as Cheney, said his administration is trying to clean up "a mess" left behind by the Bush administration. He defended his plan to close the Guantanamo Bay detention center in Cuba, his ban on torture, the release of Bush-era interrogation memos and his objection to the release of prisoner photos.

Levin backed up Obama's "mess" claims, and said the enhanced interrogations have hurt America's image.

"Cheney's world view, which so dominated the Bush years and dishonored our nation, gained a little traction last week -- enough to persuade me to address it head-on here tonight," Levin said. "I do so because if the abusive interrogation techniques that he champions, the face of which were the pictures of abuse at Abu Ghraib, if they are once more seen as representative of America, our security will be severely set back."

On Thursday night, former President George W. Bush, who has remained virtually mum on the torture debate, said his administration's enhanced interrogation program was legal and garnered valuable information that prevented terrorist attacks.

Bush told an audience in Benton Harbor, Michigan, that after the September 11 attacks, "I vowed to take whatever steps that were necessary to protect you."

In his speech, Bush did not specifically refer to Obama's decision to halt the use of harsh interrogation techniques; he also didn't mention Cheney by name.

Bush described how he proceeded after the capture of terrorism suspect Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in March 2003.

"The first thing you do is ask, 'What's legal?' " Bush said. " 'What do the lawyers say is possible?' I made the decision, within the law, to get information, so I can say to myself, 'I've done what it takes to do my duty to protect the American people.' I can tell you that the information we got saved lives."

The latest charge by Levin comes as another top Democrat -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi -- continues to defend claims that the CIA never briefed Congress on the specific interrogation methods, such as waterboarding, that were being used.

Pelosi told reporters in May that she was briefed by the CIA on such techniques once -- in September 2002, when she was the ranking Democrat on the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee -- and that she was told at the time that techniques such as waterboarding were not being used. She said she learned that waterboarding had been used after other lawmakers were briefed in 2003.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITI...evin.cheney/index.html
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Then we should release these memos and show Cheney to be a liar.

Who is Obama trying to protect??
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
So lets see the documents and prove Cheney a liar!

And I cant believe nobody in the media is roasting Pelosi over her obvious lies.
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,888
2,788
136
Originally posted by: Genx87
So lets see the documents and prove Cheney a liar!

And I cant believe nobody in the media is roasting Pelosi over her obvious lies.

That's because facts have a liberal bias and there is no liberal media.
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
Ruh-roh. Seems Cheney has been laying it on thick as of late. I personally would like the memos released not because I have an agenda, but I'm tired of the FUD surrounding the memos. I don't care what information, if any, is obtained by 'enhanced interrogation' i.e. torture. These techniques are still something we shouldn't do regardless, even if it eventually saves us another 9/11. In the mean time, maybe we can move on to more important domestic issues.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,333
32,876
136
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I think the issue should go to the Hague

This is true. The International Criminal Court was designed for situations like this where a nation is incapable of bringing its war criminals to justice. The US has demonstrated that our justice system is not capable of addressing war crimes and crimes against humanity by former high-ranking officials.
 

LumbergTech

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2005
3,622
1
0
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: Genx87
So lets see the documents and prove Cheney a liar!

And I cant believe nobody in the media is roasting Pelosi over her obvious lies.

That's because facts have a liberal bias and there is no liberal media.

cue the distraction brigade...

i dont think anyone likes pelosi ...i wouldnt mind seeing her go down
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Is Cheney lying? Are his lips moving?


Yes, but by the time this issue gains enough traction to warrant an indictment, he will have already croaked from his fifth or sixth coronary. The fucker is probably going to escape the wrath altogether. :|
 

SecPro

Member
Jul 17, 2007
147
0
0
From Adm. Blair, Oblah-blah's Director of National Intelligence:


"All of us remember the horror of 9/11. For months afterwards we did not have a clear understanding of the enemy we were dealing with, and our every effort was focused on preventing further attacks that would kill more Americans. It was during these months that the CIA was struggling to obtain critical information from captured al-Qaeda leaders, and requested permission to use harsher interrogation methods....High value information came from interrogations in which those methods were used and provided deeper understanding of the al-Qaeda organization that was attacking this country."

He went on to say:

"I also strongly supported the president (Obama) when he declared that we would no longer use enhanced interrogation techniques. We do not need these techniques to keep America safe. The information gained from these techniques was valuable in some instances, but there is no way of knowing whether the same information could have been obtained through other means. The bottom line is these techniques have hurt our image around the world, the damage they have done to our interests far outweighed whatever benefit they gave us and they are not essential to our national security."
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
30,677
45,755
136
I've believed the whole time that Cheney's strategy was to pin it all on memos that can't be released due to security reasons. While we search for a way to prosecute this evil scumbag, he'll check out peacefully one night from a heartattack or stroke. Send his ass to The Hague. We need to prove to ourselves and the rest of the world that we can't, and won't, let people get away with shit like this. As long as the Cheney's out there continue to get away with their crimes, we'll never know peace.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
I thought it was also of note, to observe Bush, who has been described (at least around here) as "classy" for not having engaged in the public debate over this stuff since leaving office, has now come out in two separate speeches defending his administration's behavior.

W has now effectively entered the debate too. Interesting, because I assumed he was having Cheney act as their administration's mouthpiece. Frankly, it seems neither Bush or Cheney can keep their mouths shut and simply fade off into the sunset.

Uh, yeah, stay "classy" you too. :roll:
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: LumbergTech
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: Genx87
So lets see the documents and prove Cheney a liar!

And I cant believe nobody in the media is roasting Pelosi over her obvious lies.

That's because facts have a liberal bias and there is no liberal media.

cue the distraction brigade...

i dont think anyone likes pelosi ...i wouldnt mind seeing her go down

Did you read the article?

The latest charge by Levin comes as another top Democrat -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi -- continues to defend claims that the CIA never briefed Congress on the specific interrogation methods, such as waterboarding, that were being used.

Pelosi told reporters in May that she was briefed by the CIA on such techniques once -- in September 2002, when she was the ranking Democrat on the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee -- and that she was told at the time that techniques such as waterboarding were not being used. She said she learned that waterboarding had been used after other lawmakers were briefed in 2003.

Exactly who is trying to distract here?
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
I thought it was also of note, to observe Bush, who has been described (at least around here) as "classy" for not having engaged in the public debate over this stuff since leaving office, has now come out in two separate speeches defending his administration's behavior.

W has now effectively entered the debate too. Interesting, because I assumed he was having Cheney act as their administration's mouthpiece. Frankly, it seems neither Bush or Cheney can keep their mouths shut and simply fade off into the sunset.

Uh, yeah, stay "classy" you too. :roll:

Where was your outrage at Jimmah Carter and Bill Clinton bashing a sitting president?
Democrat ex-presidents broke the silent rule on criticizing sitting presidents and democrats are crying foul when a republican does it? You opened the door, dont piss and moan when others walk through it.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
I thought it was also of note, to observe Bush, who has been described (at least around here) as "classy" for not having engaged in the public debate over this stuff since leaving office, has now come out in two separate speeches defending his administration's behavior.

W has now effectively entered the debate too. Interesting, because I assumed he was having Cheney act as their administration's mouthpiece. Frankly, it seems neither Bush or Cheney can keep their mouths shut and simply fade off into the sunset.

Uh, yeah, stay "classy" you too. :roll:

Where was your outrage at Jimmah Carter and Bill Clinton bashing a sitting president?

Clearly, they waited far longer than Cheney or Bush combined before entering the public debate over the current administration's actions and/or policies, but nice try at a duhversion. Would you like to talk about Pelosi now?
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: Genx87
So lets see the documents and prove Cheney a liar!

And I cant believe nobody in the media is roasting Pelosi over her obvious lies.

Pelosi, being Pelosi... she is roasting herself. Hopefully the numbnuts in San Francisco FINALLY see it and don't re-elect her this next round.

Is she up for re-election in 2010 or 2012?

Beyond that, hopefully the rest of the dems in congress see that she is poison and hurts the party more than she helps it, and removes her leadership role.
 

Xellos2099

Platinum Member
Mar 8, 2005
2,277
13
81
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
I thought it was also of note, to observe Bush, who has been described (at least around here) as "classy" for not having engaged in the public debate over this stuff since leaving office, has now come out in two separate speeches defending his administration's behavior.

W has now effectively entered the debate too. Interesting, because I assumed he was having Cheney act as their administration's mouthpiece. Frankly, it seems neither Bush or Cheney can keep their mouths shut and simply fade off into the sunset.

Uh, yeah, stay "classy" you too. :roll:

Where was your outrage at Jimmah Carter and Bill Clinton bashing a sitting president?

Clearly, they waited far longer than Cheney or Bush combined before entering the public debate over the current administration's actions and/or policies, but nice try at a duhversion. Would you like to talk about Pelosi now?

Again, double standard.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
I thought it was also of note, to observe Bush, who has been described (at least around here) as "classy" for not having engaged in the public debate over this stuff since leaving office, has now come out in two separate speeches defending his administration's behavior.

W has now effectively entered the debate too. Interesting, because I assumed he was having Cheney act as their administration's mouthpiece. Frankly, it seems neither Bush or Cheney can keep their mouths shut and simply fade off into the sunset.

Uh, yeah, stay "classy" you too. :roll:

Where was your outrage at Jimmah Carter and Bill Clinton bashing a sitting president?

Clearly, they waited far longer than Cheney or Bush combined before entering the public debate over the current administration's actions and/or policies, but nice try at a duhversion. Would you like to talk about Pelosi now?

Nice rationalization lol. The door is open, dont whine about who comes through.

Pelosi was part of your own story or didnt you fully read it?

 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: Xellos2099
Again, double standard.
Says you.

Al Gore, as just one example, waited TWO years before he started commenting publicly on the following administration. Cheney waited, what? Two weeks? Two days?

I guess folks like you can't see the difference there, no big surprise. Ah, and Genx87 too I see. No difference between 2 years and 2 weeks, eh? Yeah, it's all the same.

You two are hilarious.