- Oct 17, 2010
- 22,021
- 3
- 76
How long?
At least as long as I've been aware of your existence
How long?
At least as long as I've been aware of your existence
So I've only been a Cyclone since you became aware of me? How does this work exactly?
I said at least as long, learn to read properly.
How exactly am I a cyclone anyways?
You wouldn't understand, cyclones have trouble understanding their cyclonedom.
I want to understand. Cyclones are pretty cool.
Do you think that cyclones are better than peasants?
Hah, classic delusional cyclone
It's interesting that you apply human behavior to weather patterns.
is that what a lifetime of tea drinking and bean-eating does to one's mental capacity?
not sure how one (neckbeard) can turn atheist and reject useless, debasing, archaic institutions based on sound and reasonable logic, yet that same person (neckbeard) can openly accept an equally archaic (nearly as long-lived), debasing, and useless institution such as monarchy--by simply blinding oneself to the same sort of logic employed to reject the other.
fascinating.
is that what a lifetime of tea drinking and bean-eating does to one's mental capacity?
Ahh, so unlike it to be that a republic could ever "suck" a state in Central America dry....?I grew up in the small British commonwealth Country of Belize... I am the grandson of Scottish ex pats. My dad has dual Citizenships of Belize and Great Britain.
As for me....I will NEVER seek British Citizenship and feel the British raped and sucked the old Colony of Belize dry!
Screw Great Britain as far as I am concerned!!
Ahh, so unlike it to be that a republic could ever "suck" a state in Central America dry....?
Dude, be thankful during the time of your or your parents that Belize didn't nearly face the extremes of genocide in Guatemala, and onto smaller scale massacres down through Honduras, el Salvador, Nicaragua, etc.... Then to go back to the first half of the 20th century with US military invasions and brutal occupations of neighbouring regional states -- other than Belize.
Belize gained self-governance in 1964, and full Independence in 1981. Guatemala, rather than Britain, was Belize's greatest threat as it retained the perception of Belize not to be independent, but a territory of Guatemala. If you put it all into perspective, Belize under the British crown, kept the USA out, and was a relative beacon of stability in this region.
Just being pragmatically honest here.
Ahh, so unlike it to be that a republic could ever "suck" a state in Central America dry....?
Dude, be thankful during the time of your or your parents that Belize didn't nearly face the extremes of genocide in Guatemala, and onto smaller scale massacres down through Honduras, el Salvador, Nicaragua, etc.... Then to go back to the first half of the 20th century with US military invasions and brutal occupations of neighbouring regional states -- other than Belize.
Belize gained self-governance in 1964, and full Independence in 1981. Guatemala, rather than Britain, was Belize's greatest threat as it retained the perception of Belize not to be independent, but a territory of Guatemala. If you put it all into perspective, Belize under the British crown, kept the USA out, and was a relative beacon of stability in this region.
Just being pragmatically honest here.
The British Empire was the most ruthless organization on the planet. Don't try to pretend that any non-settler colony was better treated by the British than any possible treatment by others. That just defies history and the billions who were slaughtered in the name of the monarchy.
The word British is Hebrew and it means "Covenant Man" or the "People of The Covenant", as it does also in the Welsh language.
Elizabeth Mountbatten, also known by the aliases Elizabeth Windsor and Elizabeth the Second, who has never officially been crowned, because she was crowned sitting upon a fake Stone of Destiny, is, like all of her predecessors, from the royal line of king David of Israel and the British Throne is the Throne of David that is to be inherited by Christ
The British people, who are Israelites, under The Covenant, have been betrayed; impoverished and oppressed by the monarchy through-out its long and evil existence, because the people themselves have not kept The Covenant, that they swore at Sinai to keep for ever.
Under that Covenant the monarch is prohibited from using their position for personal material gain of any kind and from making up their own laws and taxes and economic policies; either themselves or their politicians.
There is no British Monarchy. The UK is a Democratic republic just like all the other first world countries. The Queen is there for show, as a mere symbol, while the prime minister runs the country as the equivalent of the president of France, for example.
The morality, legitimacy of the history of the monarch, should it be there? Is it ethical / moral? Why does America not have one? Is it better or worse without it.
Use this thread to discuss that.
There is no British Monarchy. The UK is a Democratic republic just like all the other first world countries. The Queen is there for show, as a mere symbol, while the prime minister runs the country as the equivalent of the president of France, for example.
The British Empire was the most ruthless organization on the planet. Don't try to pretend that any non-settler colony was better treated by the British than any possible treatment by others. That just defies history and the billions who were slaughtered in the name of the monarchy.
It's interesting that you apply human behavior to weather patterns.
Billions? Colonialism was the order of the day.