RussianSensation
Elite Member
I too agree with 3DVagabond. Every Nvidia fan thought the release prices for GTX460 were fantastic when compared to AMD. Now we have about a 25-30 % sale price drop and these guys are saying, things are cool.
Yes guys, everything is A OK in Nvidia land. They dropped the price because they love you.
Let's assume 5850 sells for $260 with a $130 profit margin (50%). Let's assume GTX460 sells for $200 with a $100 profit margin (since it's similar in size and also has 1GB of ram, manufactured on same 40nm process, assume 50% profit margin). So ATI sells 10 5850s, while NV would need to sell 13 GTX460s at $200 to make the same gross profit. The difference is, while the absolute gross profit is the same for both ATI and NV ($1300), NV just sold 30% more cards (i.e. increased market share by 30%).
This is just a simplified example. But you can see how NV can sell 2x as many GTX460s and get the same gross profit as ATI (for example, if you increase your inventory turnover 2x while reducing gross margin by 50%, you arrive at the same gross profit --> Sell 100% inventory at 100% gross margin = 2x 100% inventory *50% gross margin).
Maybe NV is fine with lower gross margins than ATI if they can still make the same gross profit in absolute terms, while increasing market share at the cost of lower gross margins (Revenue - COGS). It could very well be that they are trying to increase market share at the cost of losing profitability per each card sold, however, maintaining overall gross profits through larger volume of sales.
Remember guys, Total Gross Profit = Profitability per card x Number of cards sold
So if I can sell 3x as many cards by lowering profitability 20%, I am going to take that because my Total Gross Profit is going to rise by 300% * 0.8 (reduced gross margins due to lower prices by 20%) = 240%.
To assume that NV can't sell GTX460s at higher margins is too simplistic. They probably can, but it may not maximize Gross Profits or market share gains. I think there is a confusion between Gross Margin per each card sold vs. Total Gross Profits which are tied to both margins and volumes of inventory sold.
Bottom line is, it's too complicated to know for sure why NV is pricing their cards lower - we don't know if their motivation is gaining back market share, if 58xx are still outselling 4xx series forcing NV to lower prices, or if the resellers have purchased large stocks of cards beforehand and now have excess inventory they need to clear out. We don't know if the resellers/retailers/wholesalers are taking a hit with lower prices or if NV is sponsoring these price cuts either. Not enough info.
Last edited: