Flipped Gazelle
Diamond Member
- Sep 5, 2004
- 6,666
- 3
- 81
It's fairly subjective, they're about 20% faster than a single 480 but with the drawbacks of multi-gpu.
There are drawbacks to SLI or Crossfire, notably driver issues, poor scaling, stuttering, micro-stutter(not to be confused with stuttering), twice the heat, twice the power consumption, cooling issues and more. I use multi-gpu, but don't think a 20% performance increase is worth it to take 460 SLI over a 480. A single 480 would be my preference in that situation.
In Canada I can get a 480 for $450 right now, and a 1GB 460 at the cheapest is maybe $200 and that is from a crappy vendor who RMA will be a PITA with if I have a problem. If I bought 2 EVGA 460s, the cost would be the same as a single 480.
Multi-gpu is great, but from my past experience, is best left to being done on flagship cards. IMO of course![]()
SLI scales better than Crossfire depending on the situation. Which is why 460 SLI can deliver some decent numbers compared to 5870CF, but a single 460 on its own is a good deal slower than a 5870.
I hope AMD can improve their scaling with the upcoming 6 series. So I welcome news like this of them improving multi-gpu scaling. Their only weakness atm in performance from my perspective is Crossfire scaling. If we can get 150+% the performance of 480 SLI out of 6870 CF, that will pretty much be enough horsepower to run any game at its highest settings at my current resolution with a 60fps avg :thumbsup:
When my brother bought his 2 GTX 460's the total came to about $50 less than a single 480. I hadn't realized how much the prices of 480's have dropped since then.
