LAPD Badged Thugs Kill 14 Year Old While NOT Shooting At Her

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,040
24,351
136
So and handful of woodchucks in the middle of bumfuck are in the klan, therefore America is Amerikkka? I know you're not dumb enough to make that leap in logic. Go to bed and try again tomorrow. And what does that have to do with some lunatic trying to beat some woman to death, and some 14YO girl getting accidentally shot? Jesus Christ this forum is unhinged.
The guy who said Amerikkka posted an article on police training, which is totally on subject and you continue to ignore, because that's what conservatives do, refuse to evolve. So don't pretend you give a shit about talking about the topic, because you latch onto something else instead and ignore what was posted altogether.

And when you have the core base of a party embracing the confederacy and the flag of slavery and their cult leader president endorsing all that, the kkk moniker isn't outrageous at all. But again, you don't want to admit what your party really is deep down because you don't care.

Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
 
  • Love
Reactions: JEDIYoda

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,544
6,368
126
I agree with him about typing out AmreiKKKa. Anyone post where the poster types out something like that I automatically stop reading. It lets me know all I need to about the poster.

I'm not agreeing/disagreeing with what that poster said because I didn't read it - just that anyone typing out something like that gets overlooked by me as well.

I do the same thing when someone types out Micro$oft too.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
70 million people voted for a man proven to be horrifically racist and hellbent on ruining the country.
So yeah, America is now Amerikkka.

Suck it up losers.

None of you had the balls to take an AR-15 to a trump rally and start shooting fascists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HomerJS

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,544
6,368
126
^^^ What about people that include TappyTap spam in their posts?
No that has some use because if there are typos or something off, you can chalk it up to fat fingering and/or auto-correct.

It also doesn't come until the end of the post so by that point I would have read it.
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,225
136
No that has some use because if there are typos or something off, you can chalk it up to fat fingering and/or auto-correct.

It also doesn't come until the end of the post so by that point I would have read it.

So, act like a little know-it-all conservative, eh?
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,040
24,351
136
So, act like a little know-it-all conservative, eh?

He isn't conservative. But he is missing the very relevant article the poster linked up after saying Amerikkka. Also, when a major political party loves and venerates symbols of slavery and the confederacy and their president encourages that and says BLM is a symbol of hate, I don't think AmeriKKKa is that offensive in the context of what is the perfect world of the modern republican party.



Anyway this is a chance for the cops to own something. Look, the initial responding officers were doing proper police work. They had the subject with guns pointed at him, the victim was close to them and seemingly safe. This is good police work, waiting to surround him. However we must criticize the Rambo cop that came in guns blazing and undid all their good work. We will hold him accountable and commend the officers that did things right.

But cops will not do this. This is why people are super pissed at policing today.
 
Nov 17, 2019
13,229
7,851
136
Anyway this is a chance for the cops to own something. Look, the initial responding officers were doing proper police work. They had the subject with guns pointed at him, the victim was close to them and seemingly safe. This is good police work, waiting to surround him. However we must criticize the Rambo cop that came in guns blazing and undid all their good work. We will hold him accountable and commend the officers that did things right.
Not sure why this came to mind from your outline, but I see an old Adam-12 situation here. Reed, Malloy, Woods and Brinkman are there and have the scene more or less under control, when crazy, wild Ed Wells comes charging in.
 
Nov 17, 2019
13,229
7,851
136
Do you realize you use "AmeriKKKa" in like 90% of your post? Like it's clever and you coined the term? LOL

Search AmeriKKKa and this forum. It's good for a laugh for such unoriginality and the sheer number of times you say it. It's like your version of "Make America Great Again".
AmeriKKKa is a perfect term to describe the great expanse of AmeriKKKa infested with AmeriKKKaners.

There are even some AmeriKKKaners in police departments.
 

m8d

Senior member
Nov 5, 2012
661
1,067
136
Do you realize you use "AmeriKKKa" in like 90% of your post? Like it's clever and you coined the term? LOL

Search AmeriKKKa and this forum. It's good for a laugh for such unoriginality and the sheer number of times you say it. It's like your version of "Make America Great Again".
Can't20190613_182811827_iOS.jpg forget how it stated
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
And had every reason to blow him away.
sorry they did not.......an idiot overzealous police officer shot without thinking that those bullets would go through those walls.......collateral damage is not acceptable!
 

HurleyBird

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2003
2,800
1,528
136
Here is an article about the officer who shot the 3 shots in which one killed that girl....

And... so?

"They told him to slow down!"

"He crossed state lines!"

It's pathetic how certain media outlets repeat these irrelevant narratives and for certain people, it's like inserting a directive into a robot's brain, where they mindlessly regurgitate that narrative without thinking for a second whether it makes any sense whatsoever. In the case of Rittenhouse, the right justifiably mocked the left with memes over the whole "state lines" stupidity.

In this case, if people would stop for a moment and rub two brain cells together, they'd realize the obvious: Saying "slow down" in what is perceived to be an active shooter environment has nothing to do with concern for the ostensible shooter's welfare (duh), and everything to do with the officer on point's welfare. Earlier, that same officer repeatedly told the others to slow down so he could take point with the rifle. Setting aside the whole "monkey see monkey do" aspect of the situation, the officer on point's motivation for moving faster is his perception that a victim may be in imminent harm. In no way does any of this bolster the case against the officer. If anything, it shows that the officers perceived a grave threat, which bolsters the subjective reasonableness of deadly force.
 
Nov 17, 2019
13,229
7,851
136
. If anything, it shows that the officers perceived a grave threat,
So, he was looking in a mirror?


Earlier, that same officer repeatedly told the others to slow down so he could take point with the rifle.

OohhOhhhohhhh, I got me a shootem up, lemme get up front so I can boomboom 'em first!!!!


Maybe they'll let him go first in the chow line at the state pen.
 

LikeLinus

Lifer
Jul 25, 2001
11,518
670
126
yadda yadda yadda
And we all know, all police are KKK members. Do you think all teachers are pedophiles because a few have slept with students? I mean, calling all cops racist in every single post is just stupid. Anyone with an ounce of intelligence knows it's wrong, but saying all cops are KKK is just childish and completely moronic. In other words, how about finding a better way to communicate your thoughts without just spewing the same hateful bullshit constantly.

But you do you!
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
And... so?

"They told him to slow down!"

"He crossed state lines!"

It's pathetic how certain media outlets repeat these irrelevant narratives and for certain people, it's like inserting a directive into a robot's brain, where they mindlessly regurgitate that narrative without thinking for a second whether it makes any sense whatsoever. In the case of Rittenhouse, the right justifiably mocked the left with memes over the whole "state lines" stupidity.

In this case, if people would stop for a moment and rub two brain cells together, they'd realize the obvious: Saying "slow down" in what is perceived to be an active shooter environment has nothing to do with concern for the ostensible shooter's welfare (duh), and everything to do with the officer on point's welfare. Earlier, that same officer repeatedly told the others to slow down so he could take point with the rifle. Setting aside the whole "monkey see monkey do" aspect of the situation, the officer on point's motivation for moving faster is his perception that a victim may be in imminent harm. In no way does any of this bolster the case against the officer. If anything, it shows that the officers perceived a grave threat, which bolsters the subjective reasonableness of deadly force.
your representation of the facts are not accurate at all!! The other officers told this idiot officer to slow down because they perceived that some innocent bystander could get killed!! Please post a link to your diatribe that you are spouting! You are making stuff up dude!!
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,040
24,351
136
The other cops had it under control enough that no rambo had to run in and start firing a long gun like that. Again a perfect chance for the police to commend good police work and condemn a bad apple coming in and messing it up. But they won't. And we have our usual fascist cop apologists who are just bootlicking scum coming in and blessing everything they do as perfectly good. Sickening.
 

HurleyBird

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2003
2,800
1,528
136
your representation of the facts are not accurate at all!! The other officers told this idiot officer to slow down because they perceived that some innocent bystander could get killed!!

How on God's green earth you came to that conclusion? There's no evidenced for it, nor does it comport with common sense.

In a real active shooter situation, if cops were moving too slowly and more people died because of that, you would be calling them out for that too no doubt.

If new evidence turns up that there wasn't a perception of there being an active shooter that changes the calculus. As it stands, the best argument against this cop is that "he should have been able to process that the assailant didn't have a weapon." I'm not sure whether I agree with that or not since I'm not an expert on perception and reaction in critically high stress environments.

You are making stuff up dude!!

Such as?
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
How on God's green earth you came to that conclusion? There's no evidenced for it, nor does it comport with common sense.

In a real active shooter situation, if cops were moving too slowly and more people died because of that, you would be calling them out for that too no doubt.

If new evidence turns up that there wasn't a perception of there being an active shooter that changes the calculus. As it stands, the best argument against this cop is that "he should have been able to process that the assailant didn't have a weapon." I'm not sure whether I agree with that or not since I'm not an expert on perception and reaction in critically high stress environments.



Such as?
This was not an active shooter situation.....somebody with 1/2 a brain can figure that out! If you claim that what you said is factual post a link.... nowhere have I read any of your blatant assertions.
As soon as it was discovered to not be an active shooter investigation things should have immediately de-escalated! Links please!
 

HurleyBird

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2003
2,800
1,528
136
As soon as it was discovered to not be an active shooter investigation things should have immediately de-escalated! Links please!

Was it discovered and was it communicated to the officer?

Links to what exactly? That there's a perception of there being an active shooter? You heard the 911 call that claimed there was, didn't you?

Let's make this simple: If the officer either never got the active shooter info from dispatch or other officers, or did but was later told that the assailant didn't have a gun, then I'm with you 100%. Bad shoot. If the inverse is true, do you still maintain your position? If so, why?