• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Lady Gaga: Born This Way (Full Album) - Amazon MP3 - $0.99

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I bought it, but the main reason was to get upgraded to the 20GB music cloud storage tier. Her music isn't bad, I can listen to it. She's freaking nuts though, watched a couple interviews and dang, she is bat-shit crazy.

I actually wonder about that. I have a gut feeling that "Lady GaGa" is a character for her, and a piece of performance art. I can see her completely reinventing herself down the line when she gets tired of the character.
 
I actually wonder about that. I have a gut feeling that "Lady GaGa" is a character for her, and a piece of performance art. I can see her completely reinventing herself down the line when she gets tired of the character.

she's been reinventing herself with each new album (Fame, Fame Monster, Born This Way)

each album/concerts/performances have different themes/concepts, but I guess the common thread between them all is that Lady Gaga likes to play dress up. I don't think she is ever going to stop doing that.
 
🙄

Yeah, 256K MP3 is real compressed. I'd bet you money you couldn't tell the difference in a blind listening test.

Thanks for the deal OP, my wife appreciated it.

128K and some 192K I can distinguish from uncompressed in pop and rock. 256K? No way.
 
128K and some 192K I can distinguish from uncompressed in pop and rock. 256K? No way.
Amazon uses the LAME mp3 encoder with a variable bitrate preset. It is completely transparent on any equipment and with any actual music, as verified by multiple double-blind tests. No one will be able to hear the difference.

The advantages of having a lossless format for archiving is that it avoids the copy-of-a-copy problem in case you want to (a) burn the music to CD and later re-rip it or (B) convert to another file format if something overtakes mp3 in the future.
 
I doubt that your double blind tests were conducted with MP3 vs 44.1 or equivilent bit rate and levels matched within .1db. An Old Ganny can here the difference between "CD" quality and MP3 256kb with levels matched within .1db.
 
🙄

Yeah, 256K MP3 is real compressed. I'd bet you money you couldn't tell the difference in a blind listening test.

Thanks for the deal OP, my wife appreciated it.

Yes I can. Golden ear. And I dont use shit equipment to listen to shitty compressed audio.
 
Back
Top