- Dec 26, 2001
- 4,190
- 0
- 0
I found the review that BlueApple was reffering to,
3200 review
I have played around with it a little more and man does it suck batteries, but I guess all digital cameras do.
Yes it takes CompactFlash cards up to 192mb but I could not imagine needing that much...you'd need 40 batteries to take that many pics lol.
Yes it uses a serial connection which is pretty slow, about 3min for 20 'good' pictures.
good is 576x432 in low compression (all you will ever need for web pics)
better is 1152x864 in high compression
best is 1152x864 in low compression
On board memory is 2mb , 22 good pics, 9 better pics or 5 best pics (the outdoor shot was in best so you can see that its much too large for regular web use)
3200 review
I have played around with it a little more and man does it suck batteries, but I guess all digital cameras do.
Yes it takes CompactFlash cards up to 192mb but I could not imagine needing that much...you'd need 40 batteries to take that many pics lol.
Yes it uses a serial connection which is pretty slow, about 3min for 20 'good' pictures.
good is 576x432 in low compression (all you will ever need for web pics)
better is 1152x864 in high compression
best is 1152x864 in low compression
On board memory is 2mb , 22 good pics, 9 better pics or 5 best pics (the outdoor shot was in best so you can see that its much too large for regular web use)