I think I have given at least 6 benchmarks. Now you would provide 594 showing the contrary.
You are right. It was a typo, the post says IPS.
I think I have given at least 6 benchmarks. Now you would provide 594 showing the contrary.
You are right. It was a typo, the post says IPS.
I am not interested in conspiracy theories or similar stuff without any basis. I am interested in technical stuff. I repeat part of my post:
Gikaseixas
Platinum Member
- Jul 1, 2004
- 2,836
- 218
- 106
don't really care if it consumes 220w but what about matching i7 3930k on most things (given the price)? Very disappointed. Price should be 300 maximum for this and 250 for the FX9370.
frozentundra123456
Lifer
- Aug 11, 2008
- 10,451
- 642
- 126
A recommendation without documentation of who actually made it or whether they had a vested interest of some sort is hardly "technical stuff".
No its not been debunked yet.
That review you posted from bit-tech was a bit on the low side, being only 47W over the 3770 non-overclocked.
TR's review showed that under full load using x264 the 8350 was ~100W higher. Xbit's test using linx gave an 87W difference. IDC's testing showed that the 8350 was consuming roughly 200W at stock.
The huge delta, large differences btwn reviews and AMD not showing the temps correctly makes people think that the PD 8350 might not be properly binned. I'm not discounting that the 3960x could be picked golden samples however.
In the end, it might not matter to the enthusiast who sees this high end model as a collectible. Like smoky black power firearms, being large (2 billion xtors), run hot, heavy heatsink and suck down lots of power are fun distinguishing traits of what might be AMDs last big and extra wide cpu. But its not some stable and reliable workhorse cpu for the office, I think some motherboards might flame out or implement some throttling tech.
ShintaiDK
Lifer
- Apr 22, 2012
- 20,378
- 146
- 106
349$ and 899$ with only 30 days warranty. And shown by the wrong frequency.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819113346
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819113347
"This item can only be purchased with combo " You need to buy a complete system in order to get this processor. I tried adding it to my cart and it wanted me to buy $1300 worth of computer parts on top of it.
I take it you can't buy them separately unless you find it from an unauthorized retailer.
Last edited:
So it seems like to me, the market for this processor is liquid-nitrogen-using overclocking benchmarkers.
It seems like nobody in their right mind would buy this over an Intel one, or something like an 8320/8350.
This sucks, both generations of processors right now run unbelievably hot
It seems like nobody in their right mind would buy this over an Intel one, or something like an 8320/8350.
This sucks, both generations of processors right now run unbelievably hot
I just saw the FX9590 and FX9370 available at my usual computer supplier in the UK. The FX9590 is £583 and FX9370 is £216 and they are instock 
I also noticed that they have the AMD Opteron 6272 16 Core Processor for £274 but this is outstock. Who wouldn't want a 16 Core CPU just for bragging rights? I used to own an AMD Opteron 180 which was a grreat CPU.
AMD proudly presents Opteron 6272 processor from the AMD Opteron 6200 Series-the world's first and only 16-core x86 server processor with the highest core density for incredible scalability to handle demanding multi-threaded workloads such as cloud computing, virtualization, high-performance computing (HPC), databases and business applications. The innovative modular architecture helps pack in more cores, making it the natural choice for heavy-threaded cloud computing environments and enterprise applications that demand outstanding performance and scalability.
- Cores: 16 core
- Clock Speed: 2.1GHz
- Turbo Speed: 3.0GHz
- L1 Cache: 48kb x 16
- L2 Cache: 1MB x 16
- L3 Cache: 16MB
- Wattage: 115W
- FSB/HT Speed: 6400MT/s
- Socket: G34 (LGA 1944)
I also noticed that they have the AMD Opteron 6272 16 Core Processor for £274 but this is outstock. Who wouldn't want a 16 Core CPU just for bragging rights? I used to own an AMD Opteron 180 which was a grreat CPU.
AMD proudly presents Opteron 6272 processor from the AMD Opteron 6200 Series-the world's first and only 16-core x86 server processor with the highest core density for incredible scalability to handle demanding multi-threaded workloads such as cloud computing, virtualization, high-performance computing (HPC), databases and business applications. The innovative modular architecture helps pack in more cores, making it the natural choice for heavy-threaded cloud computing environments and enterprise applications that demand outstanding performance and scalability.
- Cores: 16 core
- Clock Speed: 2.1GHz
- Turbo Speed: 3.0GHz
- L1 Cache: 48kb x 16
- L2 Cache: 1MB x 16
- L3 Cache: 16MB
- Wattage: 115W
- FSB/HT Speed: 6400MT/s
- Socket: G34 (LGA 1944)
I don't suppose anyone has seen any sort of review on the 9370? I'm curious if the slightly lower clock speed tames the heat output a bit, and if it'll hit 9590 clocks without too much drama.
I just saw the FX9590 and FX9370 available at my usual computer supplier in the UK. The FX9590 is £583 and FX9370 is £216 and they are instock
I also noticed that they have the AMD Opteron 6272 16 Core Processor for £274 but this is outstock. Who wouldn't want a 16 Core CPU just for bragging rights? I used to own an AMD Opteron 180 which was a grreat CPU.
AMD proudly presents Opteron 6272 processor from the AMD Opteron 6200 Series-the world's first and only 16-core x86 server processor with the highest core density for incredible scalability to handle demanding multi-threaded workloads such as cloud computing, virtualization, high-performance computing (HPC), databases and business applications. The innovative modular architecture helps pack in more cores, making it the natural choice for heavy-threaded cloud computing environments and enterprise applications that demand outstanding performance and scalability.
- Cores: 16 core
- Clock Speed: 2.1GHz
- Turbo Speed: 3.0GHz
- L1 Cache: 48kb x 16
- L2 Cache: 1MB x 16
- L3 Cache: 16MB
- Wattage: 115W
- FSB/HT Speed: 6400MT/s
- Socket: G34 (LGA 1944)
apparently the 16 core opteron is two 4 module bulldozer/vishera cpus kinda glued together, look at the pin out of g34 v. am3+
RussianSensation
Elite Member
- Sep 5, 2003
- 19,458
- 765
- 126
Well Newegg has it at $900. Where you guys talking about eBay pricing? Ya, I was not looking at that.
ShintaiDK
Lifer
- Apr 22, 2012
- 20,378
- 146
- 106
I bought one at $368 yesterday, but the seller told me he doesn't have them in stock (though they were marked as such when I paid). He said it was an Amazon mistake, but he's trying to get an ETA for me, or find out if he'll be getting any at all. They were around for ~$400 yesterday, that seems to have dried up, though.
I already have my motherboard and DDR3 on the way from Newegg. So I can stick my Phenom in there if I want, but I really want to get a 9590... just not for $800+.
Only get AMD in a cheap laptop for basic internet surfing and programs. Anything gaming wise....forget it!
don't know where to begin with this...
an amd a10-5750m will game competitively with a i7-4770k...
ShintaiDK
Lifer
- Apr 22, 2012
- 20,378
- 146
- 106
Makaveli
Diamond Member
- Feb 8, 2002
- 4,975
- 1,571
- 136
Agreed. I am looking forward to getting one of these AMD parts to watch Youtube @ 5GHz. I hear its better that way.
I honestly don't know off the top of my head... but I'll say for the sake of argument that it'd lose in the benchmarks. Does that change anything regarding the quote he is responding to?
3dmark icestorm amd--> 61503 | intel --> 40454
it should outperform it in integrated gaming scenarios
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-HD-Graphics-5000.91978.0.html
[apple mbp i5]
http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Radeon-HD-7660G.69830.0.html
[amd a10-4600m instead of the a10-5750m]
then again the i5 has less than half the tdp, uses less power, is an soc and competitive cpu performance.
then again it is twice the price of the amd part
i5 4288U - hasn't been benched in the wild yet afaik...
competitively http://www.anandtech.com/show/7032/...-gpu-on-the-desktop-radeon-hd-8670d-hd-4600/2
I will not derail this thread anymore!
Last edited:
ShintaiDK
Lifer
- Apr 22, 2012
- 20,378
- 146
- 106
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Genera...-Perspective/Intel-HD-5000-Graphics-Performan
But maybe we shouldnt derail this thread with that
Phynaz
Lifer
- Mar 13, 2006
- 10,140
- 819
- 126
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 22K
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 384
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
Facebook
Twitter