Don't feel bad, lots of folks don't "get it" the first time either. Also, tons of folks will say they get it, and maybe they do, but can't really explain it. I am like that, but I will try anyway here to explain it.
William Faulkner ? Cubistic style ? the point of view and point of time change through out his novels
Pablo Picasso ? Cubistic Style ? the point of view changes, for example you see the same subject from different angles, and the dimensions change, you may see the subject in 1,2, or 3 dimensions
Quinto Tarantino ? Cubistic style ? the point of view changes, for example some times it is from Uma, sometimes Lucy Lu, etc? The perspective changes between 1st person and 3rd person, for example the opening scene is of Uma 3rd person, during her coma it is 1st person from Uma (in the my name is Buck scene)
Then the ?movie? he shows us changes, in the same sort of cubistic style. For example, sometimes we are watching a John Wayne Film, then sometimes we are watching a Bruce Lee flick. Like if Picasso not only shows us a guitar from different perspectives, some times it is also different guitar, but the ?subject? is still a guitar, or maybe the subject is music and our ideas about music, so by obfuscating the guitar, we will jump back and see the "real subject," music. This also implies, multiple "subjects." So, different movies are like different guitars, but the ?subject? is still Kill Bill. And, this also implies that the important part is not so much the subject; i.e., the guitar, but the dynamics between the changes in perspective. Picasso also tells us, "Guitars" are important things in our lives with many meanings. So, Kill Bill has a week plot, but that isn?t the point, as in my guitar example maybe the subject isn?t even really ?Kill Bill? as that story is so obfuscated, forcing us to jump back and see the subject is maybe ?movies.? But, the point of the film is the perspective and dimensional changes. He also tells us that "movies" are important things in our lives with many meaning, and in particular in his own life, as he grew up watching and loving these movies, and is now him self a film maker. Picasso might do a self-portrait in one of his paintings or a paintings of a painting. For example, Uma doing the square is both a self portrait , a Tarantino film (implying "I am the movies I make"), and a movie of a movie.
William Faulkner ? Cubistic style ? the point of view and point of time change through out his novels
Pablo Picasso ? Cubistic Style ? the point of view changes, for example you see the same subject from different angles, and the dimensions change, you may see the subject in 1,2, or 3 dimensions
Quinto Tarantino ? Cubistic style ? the point of view changes, for example some times it is from Uma, sometimes Lucy Lu, etc? The perspective changes between 1st person and 3rd person, for example the opening scene is of Uma 3rd person, during her coma it is 1st person from Uma (in the my name is Buck scene)
Then the ?movie? he shows us changes, in the same sort of cubistic style. For example, sometimes we are watching a John Wayne Film, then sometimes we are watching a Bruce Lee flick. Like if Picasso not only shows us a guitar from different perspectives, some times it is also different guitar, but the ?subject? is still a guitar, or maybe the subject is music and our ideas about music, so by obfuscating the guitar, we will jump back and see the "real subject," music. This also implies, multiple "subjects." So, different movies are like different guitars, but the ?subject? is still Kill Bill. And, this also implies that the important part is not so much the subject; i.e., the guitar, but the dynamics between the changes in perspective. Picasso also tells us, "Guitars" are important things in our lives with many meanings. So, Kill Bill has a week plot, but that isn?t the point, as in my guitar example maybe the subject isn?t even really ?Kill Bill? as that story is so obfuscated, forcing us to jump back and see the subject is maybe ?movies.? But, the point of the film is the perspective and dimensional changes. He also tells us that "movies" are important things in our lives with many meaning, and in particular in his own life, as he grew up watching and loving these movies, and is now him self a film maker. Picasso might do a self-portrait in one of his paintings or a paintings of a painting. For example, Uma doing the square is both a self portrait , a Tarantino film (implying "I am the movies I make"), and a movie of a movie.