• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Kidnapper sues his hostages for breech of contract UGH!!!!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
This will be dismissed as soon as the lawyer representing the victims files a motion to dismiss.

To be clear, the kidnapper brought this suit only after the victims sued him alleging damages as a result of the kidnapping. I'm not sure why they're bothering - I can't imagine he has any assets, though one never knows. Civil litigation is costly and a pain in the ass when one party is in prison (and I speak from experience on that, having defended a police civil rights case and a personal injury case in which both plaintiffs were in prison)
 
I'm sure the State is going to pay the bills for all of this since he's in State custody. Just another in a long line of prisoner lawsuits that the States pay for.

State's not paying anything. The guy is pro se. No lawyer. And there's no way his suit will survive a motion to dismiss.

ZV
 
And will the hostages have to hire an attorney to file that motion to dismiss?

The hostages are already represented - they started the litigation by suing the kidnapper (not that that excuses his suit against them, but there is always a risk of a counterclaim - in this case a frivolous one - when you sue someone).
 
The Topeka Capital-Journal reported that Dimmick filed a breach of contract suit in Shawnee County District Court, in response to a suit the Rowleys filed in September seeking $75,000 from him for intruding in their home and causing emotional stress.

Spite suit. I am sure it will be dismissed.
 
Back
Top