Kidnapper sues his hostages for breech of contract UGH!!!!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
66
91
This will be dismissed as soon as the lawyer representing the victims files a motion to dismiss.

To be clear, the kidnapper brought this suit only after the victims sued him alleging damages as a result of the kidnapping. I'm not sure why they're bothering - I can't imagine he has any assets, though one never knows. Civil litigation is costly and a pain in the ass when one party is in prison (and I speak from experience on that, having defended a police civil rights case and a personal injury case in which both plaintiffs were in prison)
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,512
21
81
I'm sure the State is going to pay the bills for all of this since he's in State custody. Just another in a long line of prisoner lawsuits that the States pay for.

State's not paying anything. The guy is pro se. No lawyer. And there's no way his suit will survive a motion to dismiss.

ZV
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
66
91
And will the hostages have to hire an attorney to file that motion to dismiss?

The hostages are already represented - they started the litigation by suing the kidnapper (not that that excuses his suit against them, but there is always a risk of a counterclaim - in this case a frivolous one - when you sue someone).
 

Macamus Prime

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2011
3,108
0
0
The Topeka Capital-Journal reported that Dimmick filed a breach of contract suit in Shawnee County District Court, in response to a suit the Rowleys filed in September seeking $75,000 from him for intruding in their home and causing emotional stress.

Spite suit. I am sure it will be dismissed.