michal1980
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2003
- 8,019
- 43
- 91
Just curious, what part of acting in porn makes one unworthy of human decency and respect?
where did I say that?
Just curious, what part of acting in porn makes one unworthy of human decency and respect?
Never came across this site. Thanks guys. The wife is out for the day and I have some new material.
Wait a minute here.... people have porn memberships? Lulz, noobs.
It depends how he 'announced' her line of work whether he has any chance when suing. If he mentioned a video that is subscriber-only they can just claim that he 'outed himself' that way already.
If he is extremely conservative and attacked her on doing porn while claiming that porn is wrong in general then his whole family will hear about it (if they haven't yet) if he sues. Not to mention it is then extremely unlikely he'll take the offer.
If they think he may take the offer I assume it was already discussed with her in case he'd pick her. And even then they could still screw him over by casting him next to Ron Jeremy or someone like that and then doing some mean cutting and pasting after filming. He's bound to look tiny next to a guy like that, and they could make a video of an hour where you see Ron busy for 55 minutes, 4 minutes of her talking to this guy, 1 minute or less of 'action', and then her saying 'It's ok, it's not your fault!'
Not sure he'd want to risk that
I highly doubt he will have much of a case or lawsuit, or the money to fight it out in court.
From what I gathered it sounded like the guy was bullying this girl in addition to making everyone know about her porn acting. It is still outing, regardless of the fact many men buy and watch porn. Most men don't announce to everyone in a college that they watch porn, and so know one really would have been the wiser had he never said anything. This just shows his level of immaturity. The kid outed himself by saying he watched her porn movies, so I highly doubt he will have much of a case or lawsuit, or the money to fight it out in court.
I dont think you understand what a big deal a company violating their written privacy policy is. Depending on his state of residence his AG may carry the water for him on it.
Its a tremendously big deal.
you are an idiot.
She stared in a porn. how much privacy did she expect? If she didn't want embarrassment, how about not being a porn star?
Sadly, it often isn't.
Companies can and do change their terms and conditions quite regularly.
[ ... ]
This porn company should be sued for outing him, and any one that's a member should live in fear and dump them for the actions of this crazy owner.
From the F.A. privacy/ faqs
"Will anyone know that I joined your site?
Not unless you tell them! However, we believe that it's a good thing to tell people you enjoy porn, more importantly that you enjoy our exact sites! But no worries, we will never tell! "
If I was Tom, I'd be demanding far more then 10,000 dollars. And odd's are I'd get it.
This doesn't matter one bit. Since they have a privacy clause on their website and they went out and provided the information that he was a member of that website without his consent and in retribution (which the article states is the case) then they screwed up big time. ...
Your comments presume that Kulich owns or runs that website, and is therefore bound by its privacy policy. Kulich claims on Twitter that he doesn't, but that he figured it out because Knox appears on that site. I have no idea if he's telling the truth, but that's his defense. Kulich also complains that most of the stories published about this are factually inaccurate, and that only Huffington Post got it right.I dont think you understand what a big deal a company violating their written privacy policy is. Depending on his state of residence his AG may carry the water for him on it.
Its a tremendously big deal.