Keystone pipeline

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,444
47,818
136
Just hand wave the issues away........You can do better than that.

Do you support eminent domain for private projects?


Wow. I had no idea you were so charitable bryce. He just replied to a Chernobyl radiation factoid with "mushrooms are slightly poisonous." C'mon now, you're trying to debate with a bowl of oatmeal that can type.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Look at iOwa.
Farmers. Republicans. Joni Ernst.
Drill baby drill.
Sarah Plain.
Yee haw.

Then.... comes along this other pipeline in the planning stages (different from the keystone) that cut straight thru iOwa farmland and thru farm property.
And guess what... all hell broke out.
These Joni Ernst GW Bush right wing drill baby drill Chuck Grassley gerrymandered loving republican farmers suddenly found themselves on the wrong side of the fence.
NOT IN MY BACKYARD !!!!!!!
And off to court they went.
So damn F**King typical.
Well, duh...

You make a litigious society, you get a litigious society.

-John
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Yes, how dare those land owners try to defend their property rights.
They don't have property rights, as they are being taxed. The Government owns their property, and can take it away, via eminent domain, whenever they want.

Do you think otherwise?

-John
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,960
30,835
136
They don't have property rights, as they are being taxed. The Government owns their property, and can take it away, via eminent domain, whenever they want.

Do you think otherwise?

-John

You were halfway cogent before, its time to stop drinking tonight. We've had the taxes does not equal ownership discussion several times now. So I'm not engaging in that again with you.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,788
46,607
136
Yeah we can rest easy knowing trains are carrying more oil than ever. They are also derailing killing people and spilling more oil than ever. But glad we are against modernizing infrastructure in the name of denying a Bush era pipeline its last phase.

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-crude-train-safety-20151007-story.html

Railroads, even the Class 1's, have been pretty historically accepting that derailments are just a cost of doing business and they're (generally) better than paying more for track maintenance. Couple that with crappy liquid tank cars and stuff that goes boom we get the present situation.

Pipelines aren't without hazard either if not properly maintained. They're generally less likely to injure or kill people in a failure but spill volume can potentially be vastly larger than any rail car accident. Like when an Enbridge pipeline blew out in Michigan and dumped a million gallons of hard to clean up diluted bitumen into the Kalamazoo river resulting in the worst/costliest inland spill in US history.

In both cases government oversight of safety requirements has been too lax.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
Real Capitalism, is dead today. Obama blocked the pipeline, when any individual person would have accepted the lucrative offer.

-John

Um.. No. Few ppl want pipelines on their land, that's why eminent domain is used (and for other projects.)

There are many other pipelines being proposed around the country due to the fracking boom, and landowners are being threatened with eminent domain in order to cut deals.

At least they're for American interests. Keystone benefits mostly Canada at our expense, and it's a scandal so many American politicians lined up to sell out for it.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
Here is another pipeline being proposed which is threatening to use eminent domain to steal land from those who don't want their land destroyed. It's in the NJ/PA border around Philadelphia in the Northeast

All these small govt politicians don't do shit once the energy companies call them up.
We can't get past the carbon economy fast enough.

If PennEast Pipeline Co. LLC cannot reach an agreement with landowners and federal regulators approve the $1 billion project, the company says it can use eminent domain to acquire the land.

PennEast made the announcement in a media packet dated Oct. 9 titled, "Landowner Bill of Rights." Eminent domain is the power to take private property for use in a public project in return for compensation.

Jeff Tittel, director of the New Jersey Sierra Club, previously said an estimated two-thirds or 70 percent of the people along the pipeline route in New Jersey have said 'no' to the pipeline and won't let PennEast on their land for surveying.

PennEast in the packet says if the company needs to use eminent domain, it likely will seek to acquire an easement and under its conditions, the landowner would retain ownership of the property. However, if the company needs land to build a compressor station, it will seek to purchase the property outright by deed and PennEast would have ownership.

Plans for the PennEast pipeline project include constructing the natural gas pipeline from Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, to Mercer County, New Jersey.

The 36-inch pipeline is proposed to transport enough natural gas from Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale region to serve 4.7 million homes, according to the company's website.

PennEast has a projected in-service date of November 2017.

PennEastMap.png


http://www.lehighvalleylive.com/news/index.ssf/2015/10/penneast_pipeline_eminent_domain_can_be_used_if_agreement_not_reached.html
 
Last edited:

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
The desire to build the pipeline has everything to do with geopolitics. Texas refineries import Venezuelan heavy crude for use in some of their product line- asphalt & other derivtives. they have refineries built to do just that. But they hate the Venezuelan govt with a purple passion because their holdings in Venezuela were nationalized.

Canadian heavy crude can serve their purposes just as well, making the pipeline attractive when oil prices were high. Screw the Venezuelans & enrich their Canadian partners while creating an environmental disaster zone in tar sand mining areas. Now that crude prices are very low the pipeline isn't worth the investment so they'll grudgingly keep buying Venezuelan heavy crude.