Kerry's IQ Likely Lower Than Bush's

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: Infohawk
They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations.
Not convinced.


P.S. Thanks for the story heartsurgeon.

Like I've said before, that must be a very dark cave!

Yep, you'll notice it's a recurring theme.

Yep, me thinks they have a parrot. Oh! I see pictures of him here occasionally.

 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Originally posted by: Condor
We really need to run electricity into that cave so you Dims can get some light!

:cookie: Now please kindly go reunite with your bridge. I hear she gets lonly when you leave to come here and post. Perhaps you should see if the cable company would run a line under the bridge so you don't ever have to leave?

Didn't understand that.

How ironic... in an IQ thread no less...
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: Condor
We really need to run electricity into that cave so you Dims can get some light!

Don't shine a light in the cave, you might wake Georgie.

Some light on this subject from someone with firsthand knowledge of Bush's intellect, one of his Harvard professors, Yoshi Tsurumi, originally appearing in Salon.com.


"His former Harvard Business School professor recalls George W. Bush not just as a terrible student but as spoiled, loutish and a pathological liar.

For 25 years, Yoshi Tsurumi, one of George W. Bush's professors at
Harvard Business School, was content with his green-card status as a
permanent legal resident of the United States. But Bush's ascension to the
presidency in 2001 prompted the Japanese native to secure his American
citizenship. The reason: to be able to speak out with the full authority of
citizenship about why he believes Bush lacks the character and intellect to
lead the world's oldest and most powerful democracy.

"I don't remember all the students in detail unless I'm prompted by
something," Tsurumi said in a telephone interview Wednesday. "But I always remember two types of students. One is the very excellent student, the type as a professor you feel honored to be working with. Someone with strong social values, compassion and intellect - the very rare person you never forget. And then you remember students like George Bush, those who are totally the opposite."

The future president was one of 85 first-year MBA students in Tsurumi's
macroeconomic policies and international business class in the fall of 1973
and spring of 1974. Tsurumi was a visiting associate professor at Harvard
Business School from January 1972 to August 1976; today, he is a professor of international business at Baruch College in New York.

Trading as usual on his father's connections, Bush entered Harvard in
1973 for a two-year program. He'd just come off what George H.W. Bush had once called his eldest son's "nomadic years" - partying, drifting from job to job, working on political campaigns in Florida and Alabama and, most
famously, apparently not showing up for duty in the Alabama National Guard.

Harvard Business School's rigorous teaching methods, in which the
professor interacts aggressively with students, and students are encouraged to challenge each other sharply, offered important insights into Bush, Tsurumi said. In observing students' in-class performances, "you develop pretty good ideas about what are their weaknesses and strengths in terms of thinking, analysis, their prejudices, their backgrounds and other things that students reveal," he said.

One of Tsurumi's standout students was Rep. Chris Cox, R-Calif., now the seventh-ranking member of the House Republican leadership. "I typed him as a conservative Republican with a conscience," Tsurumi said. "He never confused his own ideology with economics, and he didn't try to hide his ignorance of a subject in mumbo jumbo. He was what I call a principled conservative." (Though clearly a partisan one. On Wednesday, Cox called for a congressional investigation of the validity of documents that CBS News obtained for a story questioning Bush's attendance at Guard duty in Alabama.)

Bush, by contrast, "was totally the opposite of Chris Cox," Tsurumi
said. "He showed pathological lying habits and was in denial when challenged on his prejudices and biases. He would even deny saying something he just said 30 seconds ago. He was famous for that. Students jumped on him; I challenged him." When asked to explain a particular comment, said Tsurumi, Bush would respond, "Oh, I never said that." A White House spokeswoman did not return a phone call seeking comment.

In 1973, as the oil and energy crisis raged, Tsurumi led a discussion on
whether government should assist retirees and other people on fixed incomes with heating costs. Bush, he recalled, "made this ridiculous statement and when I asked him to explain, he said, 'The government doesn't have to help poor people - because they are lazy.' I said, 'Well, could you explain that assumption?' Not only could he not explain it, he started backtracking on it, saying, 'No, I didn't say that.'"

If Cox had been in the same class, Tsurumi said, "I could have asked him to challenge that and he would have demolished it. Not personally or
emotionally, but intellectually."

Bush once sneered at Tsurumi for showing the film "The Grapes of Wrath," based on John Steinbeck's novel of the Depression. "We were in a discussion of the New Deal, and he called Franklin Roosevelt's policies 'socialism.' He denounced labor unions, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Medicare, Social Security, you name it. He denounced the civil rights movement as socialism. To him, socialism and communism were the same thing. And when challenged to explain his prejudice, he could not defend his argument, either ideologically, polemically or academically."

Students who challenged and embarrassed Bush in class would then become the subject of a whispering campaign by him, Tsurumi said. "In class, he couldn't challenge them. But after class, he sometimes came up to me in the hallway and started bad-mouthing those students who had challenged him. He would complain that someone was drinking too much. It was innuendo and lies. So that's how I knew, behind his smile and his smirk, that he was a very insecure, cunning and vengeful guy."

Many of Tsurumi's students came from well-connected or wealthy families, but good manners prevented them from boasting about it, the professor said. But Bush seemed unabashed about the connections that had brought him to Harvard. "The other children of the rich and famous were at least well bred to the point of realizing universal values and standards of behavior," Tsurumi said. But Bush sometimes came late to class and often sat in the back row of the theater-like classroom, wearing a bomber jacket from the Texas Air National Guard and spitting chewing tobacco into a cup.

"At first, I wondered, 'Who is this George Bush?' It's a very common
name and I didn't know his background. And he was such a bad student that I asked him once how he got in. He said, 'My dad has good friends.'" Bush scored in the lowest 10 percent of the class.

The Vietnam War was still roiling campuses and Harvard was no exception. Bush expressed strong support for the war but admitted to Tsurumi that he'd gotten a coveted spot in the Texas Air National Guard through his father's connections.

"I used to chat up a number of students when we were walking back to
class," Tsurumi said. "Here was Bush, wearing a Texas Guard bomber jacket, and the draft was the No. 1 topic in those days. And I said, 'George, what did you do with the draft?' He said, 'Well, I got into the Texas Air National Guard.' And I said, 'Lucky you. I understand there is a long waiting list for it. How'd you get in?' When he told me, he didn't seem
ashamed or embarrassed. He thought he was entitled to all kinds of
privileges and special deals. He was not the only one trying to twist all
their connections to avoid Vietnam. But then, he was fanatically for the
war."

Tsurumi told Bush that someone who avoided a draft while supporting a
war in which others were dying was a hypocrite. "He realized he was caught, showed his famous smirk and huffed off."

Tsurumi's conclusion: Bush is not as dumb as his detractors allege. "He
was just badly brought up, with no discipline, and no compassion," he said.

In recent days, Tsurumi has told his story to various print and
television outlets and appears in Kitty Kelley's exposé "The Family: The
Real Story of the Bush Dynasty." He said other professors and students at the business school from that time share his recollections but are afraid to come forward, fearing ostracism or retribution. And why is Tsurumi speaking up now? Because with the ongoing bloodshed in Iraq and Osama bin Laden still on the loose - not to mention a federal deficit ballooning out of control - the stakes are too high to remain silent. "Obviously, I don't think he is the best person" to be running the country, he said. "I wanted to explain why."

I had a biology prof that I didn't get along with either!

 

Todd33

Diamond Member
Oct 16, 2003
7,842
2
81
Bush scored a 25/100 on the guard test, lowest passing score. Ya, he's real bright.
 

Spencer278

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 2002
3,637
0
0
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Todd33
Bush scored a 25/100 on the guard test, lowest passing score. Ya, he's real bright.
25/100 is a PASS? :confused:

I wish my school was like that.

When your dad bribes the people giving the test even a 1 can be passing.
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: Czar
Condor,
would you then say that the guy in the Solon article is biased?

No more so than most of the press we see today. Everyone has a side and most support it. What he reports though, is a matter of public record. The AFQT scores are listed on most 214's. They were a percentile of the individual tested when compared against all of the previous scores done nationally. During the Vietnam era, the bottom got pretty low because of the drafting of the less than 10,000's. Most of the stuff I read was published prior to the announcement of Kerry as a nominee. He didn't look good back then either.

 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: Todd33
Bush scored a 25/100 on the guard test, lowest passing score. Ya, he's real bright.

Which guard test? The AFQT was the general standards test and from the posting, he had to get a string of 90's and 95's on it. There were four catagories that the AFQT tested in.


 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: Czar
Condor,
would you then say that the guy in the Solon article is biased?

No more so than most of the press we see today. Everyone has a side and most support it. What he reports though, is a matter of public record. The AFQT scores are listed on most 214's. They were a percentile of the individual tested when compared against all of the previous scores done nationally. During the Vietnam era, the bottom got pretty low because of the drafting of the less than 10,000's. Most of the stuff I read was published prior to the announcement of Kerry as a nominee. He didn't look good back then either.
so he is not credable?

 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Originally posted by: Condor
We really need to run electricity into that cave so you Dims can get some light!

:cookie: Now please kindly go reunite with your bridge. I hear she gets lonly when you leave to come here and post. Perhaps you should see if the cable company would run a line under the bridge so you don't ever have to leave?

Didn't understand that.

How ironic... in an IQ thread no less...

Idiosyncratic does not relate to IQ, but requires a common history or standards set. Apparently, Umbrella39 and I simply don't have that. Somehow, I am relieved!

 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: Czar
Condor,
would you then say that the guy in the Solon article is biased?

No more so than most of the press we see today. Everyone has a side and most support it. What he reports though, is a matter of public record. The AFQT scores are listed on most 214's. They were a percentile of the individual tested when compared against all of the previous scores done nationally. During the Vietnam era, the bottom got pretty low because of the drafting of the less than 10,000's. Most of the stuff I read was published prior to the announcement of Kerry as a nominee. He didn't look good back then either.
so he is not credable?

Of course he's credible. Far more credible than someone who has no first hand knowledge of his subject using non-standardized tests filtered through his obvious right wing bias for Bush.

 

PELarson

Platinum Member
Mar 27, 2001
2,289
0
0
Hmmmm....

President Bush has a high I.Q, higher than Senator Kerry, but doesn't utilize it. Interesting life pattern there!

Senator Kerry has a high I.Q., but lower than President Bush, and has pushed himself all his life to achieve. Better life pattern there.

Thanks... one more plus in Senator Kerry's column and a big minus in President Bush's column.
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: Czar
Condor,
would you then say that the guy in the Solon article is biased?

No more so than most of the press we see today. Everyone has a side and most support it. What he reports though, is a matter of public record. The AFQT scores are listed on most 214's. They were a percentile of the individual tested when compared against all of the previous scores done nationally. During the Vietnam era, the bottom got pretty low because of the drafting of the less than 10,000's. Most of the stuff I read was published prior to the announcement of Kerry as a nominee. He didn't look good back then either.
so he is not credable?

If credible was the standard, there would be nothing published on either side. Did you watch Fahrenheit 911? Was it credible? The scores that he bases his article on are credible and a matter of record.
 

chess9

Elite member
Apr 15, 2000
7,748
0
0
"IQ expert" says it all. That's like being an economist, isn't it? Or, perhaps Madame LeFarge who reads my palm? How does the IQ expert know that Bush actually took the SAT test and didn't pay someone to take it for him? And, what proof does he offer that the AFQT then being given was comparable to a "legitimate" IQ exam? I actually scored higher on my GCT by 11 points than I did on my 9th grade IQ exam (then administered by the state). 142 vs. 131. That's a huge differential.

This guy is a political hack who is straining credulity to reach an unfirm conclusion. And, even if his entire thesis were sound, why do we care what intelligence the two candidates possessed 30 years ago?

Regardless, Bush is NOW certifiably dumber than a box of rocks.

-Robert
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: Czar
Condor,
would you then say that the guy in the Solon article is biased?

No more so than most of the press we see today. Everyone has a side and most support it. What he reports though, is a matter of public record. The AFQT scores are listed on most 214's. They were a percentile of the individual tested when compared against all of the previous scores done nationally. During the Vietnam era, the bottom got pretty low because of the drafting of the less than 10,000's. Most of the stuff I read was published prior to the announcement of Kerry as a nominee. He didn't look good back then either.
so he is not credable?

If credible was the standard, there would be nothing published on either side. Did you watch Fahrenheit 911? Was it credible? The scores that he bases his article on are credible and a matter of record.
havent seen it

so you are saying that the salon article is not credable in your opinion ?
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: Squisher
For those of you that are discounting this out-of-hand, what you are saying ultimately is that there could never be a genius that has a stutter.

A stutter would show one of the highest levels of in-articulation, therefore someone with a stutter could never possess intelligence.

Stuttering is different. I had a teacher who stuttered every few sentences - but she'd just repeat the first sound of a word a few times.
Bush uses completely incorrect or out of place words, and does so on a very regular basis, enough so to fill up a few of those "Bushism" calendars. And heck, there's the term for it too - Bushism, no stutter.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: chess9


Regardless, Bush is NOW certifiably dumber than a box of rocks.

:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:

 

Squisher

Lifer
Aug 17, 2000
21,204
66
91
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Squisher
For those of you that are discounting this out-of-hand, what you are saying ultimately is that there could never be a genius that has a stutter.

That is a nice fat leap of logic. Not the kind of thing appreciated on standardized tests....

Yes, it is taken to an extreme, but I don't think it is flawed logic.

in-articulation = lack of intelligence

Right?
 

chess9

Elite member
Apr 15, 2000
7,748
0
0
Oh, and something else. This guy Sailer isn't so pretty smart himself. He uses the present tense instead of the accurate past tense. "If anything, Bush is smarter than Kerry." [sic]

-Robert
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: Czar
Condor,
would you then say that the guy in the Solon article is biased?

No more so than most of the press we see today. Everyone has a side and most support it. What he reports though, is a matter of public record. The AFQT scores are listed on most 214's. They were a percentile of the individual tested when compared against all of the previous scores done nationally. During the Vietnam era, the bottom got pretty low because of the drafting of the less than 10,000's. Most of the stuff I read was published prior to the announcement of Kerry as a nominee. He didn't look good back then either.
so he is not credable?

If credible was the standard, there would be nothing published on either side. Did you watch Fahrenheit 911? Was it credible? The scores that he bases his article on are credible and a matter of record.
havent seen it

so you are saying that the salon article is not credable in your opinion ?

The JOHN TIERNEY article Sounds credible to me as it is firmly based on fact.

 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: chess9
Oh, and something else. This guy Sailer isn't so pretty smart himself. He uses the present tense instead of the accurate past tense. "If anything, Bush is smarter than Kerry." [sic]

-Robert


He meant what he said!
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
What does F9/11 have to do with the OP?

The credibility of Bush's Harvard professor isn't the point. Address the points made in the Salon article.
Read some of these quotes. Early signs of what Bush has become. Is this the kind of person we want as president?

"He showed pathological lying habits and was in denial when challenged on his prejudices and biases. He would even deny saying something he just said 30 seconds ago. He was famous for that. Students jumped on him; I challenged him." When asked to explain a particular comment, said Tsurumi, Bush would respond, "Oh, I never said that."

Bush once sneered at Tsurumi for showing the film "The Grapes of Wrath," based on John Steinbeck's novel of the Depression. "We were in a discussion of the New Deal, and he called Franklin Roosevelt's policies 'socialism.' He denounced labor unions, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Medicare, Social Security, you name it. He denounced the civil rights movement as socialism. To him, socialism and communism were the same thing. And when challenged to explain his prejudice, he could not defend his argument, either ideologically, polemically or academically."

Students who challenged and embarrassed Bush in class would then become the subject of a whispering campaign by him, Tsurumi said. "In class, he couldn't challenge them. But after class, he sometimes came up to me in the hallway and started bad-mouthing those students who had challenged him. He would complain that someone was drinking too much. It was innuendo and lies. So that's how I knew, behind his smile and his smirk, that he was a very insecure, cunning and vengeful guy."

In 1973, as the oil and energy crisis raged, Tsurumi led a discussion on
whether government should assist retirees and other people on fixed incomes with heating costs. Bush, he recalled, "made this ridiculous statement and when I asked him to explain, he said, 'The government doesn't have to help poor people - because they are lazy.' I said, 'Well, could you explain that assumption?' Not only could he not explain it, he started backtracking on it, saying, 'No, I didn't say that.'"

"I used to chat up a number of students when we were walking back to
class," Tsurumi said. "Here was Bush, wearing a Texas Guard bomber jacket, and the draft was the No. 1 topic in those days. And I said, 'George, what did you do with the draft?' He said, 'Well, I got into the Texas Air National Guard.' And I said, 'Lucky you. I understand there is a long waiting list for it. How'd you get in?' When he told me, he didn't seem
ashamed or embarrassed. He thought he was entitled to all kinds of
privileges and special deals. He was not the only one trying to twist all
their connections to avoid Vietnam. But then, he was fanatically for the
war."