Kelly's always been skinny, and she's at least pretty, unlike Lohan.Originally posted by: RossMAN
Eww that is nasty!
First Lindsey Lohan now Kelly Rippa?
Kelly's always been skinny, and she's at least pretty, unlike Lohan.Originally posted by: RossMAN
Eww that is nasty!
First Lindsey Lohan now Kelly Rippa?
.Originally posted by: Josh
all of hollywood seems to be gettin on the coca-eeena diet![]()
olsen twin trying to beat them all...she is fvcking disgusting..look at her wrists :Q
Originally posted by: Josh
all of hollywood seems to be gettin on the coca-eeena diet![]()
olsen twin trying to beat them all...she is fvcking disgusting..look at her wrists :Q
Originally posted by: RockHydra11
Originally posted by: Josh
all of hollywood seems to be gettin on the coca-eeena diet![]()
olsen twin trying to beat them all...she is fvcking disgusting..look at her wrists :Q
Ugh....she looks like she could be about 50 or older.![]()
It's amazing how Hollywood's starndards are so out of alignment with the rest of society. I don't know many guys who like women with scarecrow frames.Originally posted by: Geekbabe
I was briefly a size 4 for a couple months,I'm currently a size 6... which is considered obese by fashion industry standards,however I just totally lack the willpower it seems to get and keep myself that small.
Originally posted by: RockHydra11
She is so thin and feeble looking I can see the ribs in her chest...it's freakin' disgusting. :roll:
Originally posted by: Lola
in all honesty, she doesnt look as bad as other celebs that got themselves thin (i.e. Calista Flockheart). She looks good, and there is nothing wrong with be svelt. I am not saying its good to sickly thin, but there is nothing wrong with being thin.
Originally posted by: Lola
I take offense when people say how thin i am just as a heavy person would take offense if someone said they were fat.
It goes both ways.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Lola
I take offense when people say how thin i am just as a heavy person would take offense if someone said they were fat.
It goes both ways.
Your rib bones aren't showing.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Those pics are far too crappy to see what she is like, unless the pics.bb pic is better. I personally like the thin, hard appearance. I like the look of somebody who's put time into themselves and has achieved something most lack the ability/gumption to achieve. I'm not saying lohan, who needs a burger, but I admire somebody who's got the tenacity to hit the gym hard and consistently.
OK, then I don't see what the fuss is. Pic 4 shows that she has some arms left, so she's no rail. Ribs? Yes, she has some, but for a woman to get to a fairly low body fat that's unavoidable, and it doesn't mean she's too thin, but a a taut bodyfat a woman carries very, very little fat around their upper body.Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Those pics are far too crappy to see what she is like, unless the pics.bb pic is better. I personally like the thin, hard appearance. I like the look of somebody who's put time into themselves and has achieved something most lack the ability/gumption to achieve. I'm not saying lohan, who needs a burger, but I admire somebody who's got the tenacity to hit the gym hard and consistently.
oh come off it, you elitist. There's nothing wrong with the quality of those pictures. No, they're not 298475o2183741893741035 megapixels with UV lenses and all that crap, but you can perfectly see what's wrong with her. Jesus, it's like you're blind or something.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
OK, then I don't see what the fuss is. Pic 4 shows that she has some arms left, so she's no rail. Ribs? Yes, she has some, but for a woman to get to a fairly low body fat that's unavoidable, and it doesn't mean she's too thin, but a a taut bodyfat a woman carries very, very little fat around their upper body.Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Those pics are far too crappy to see what she is like, unless the pics.bb pic is better. I personally like the thin, hard appearance. I like the look of somebody who's put time into themselves and has achieved something most lack the ability/gumption to achieve. I'm not saying lohan, who needs a burger, but I admire somebody who's got the tenacity to hit the gym hard and consistently.
oh come off it, you elitist. There's nothing wrong with the quality of those pictures. No, they're not 298475o2183741893741035 megapixels with UV lenses and all that crap, but you can perfectly see what's wrong with her. Jesus, it's like you're blind or something.
Granted, she looks a bit gaunt, but those pictures are blurred. The main problem I see is that she's incredibly flat. The only way around that is to either put on fat or get implants. Personally I'd recommend the latter approach.
She did, but I don't think it suggests that at all. If you're FAT and you have a good rack it doesn't mean that you shouldn't lose weight. She wasn't fat, but any time a woman gains/loses fat she will gain/lose her rack. That's just how it is. There's no magic point at which point the rack suddenly disappears, and putting on two lbs it will all come back.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
She used to have a decent rack, the fact that she lost it suggests she lost way too much body mass (fat), period.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
She did, but I don't think it suggests that at all. If you're FAT and you have a good rack it doesn't mean that you shouldn't lose weight. She wasn't fat, but any time a woman gains/loses fat she will gain/lose her rack. That's just how it is. There's no magic point at which point the rack suddenly disappears, and putting on two lbs it will all come back.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
She used to have a decent rack, the fact that she lost it suggests she lost way too much body mass (fat), period.
It's very difficult to achieve the ideal, which is slim with large breasts. It can be done by almost no women naturally without getting implants, because when they lose the fat to hit the right fat levels they lose their chest as well.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
OK, then I don't see what the fuss is. Pic 4 shows that she has some arms left, so she's no rail. Ribs? Yes, she has some, but for a woman to get to a fairly low body fat that's unavoidable, and it doesn't mean she's too thin, but a a taut bodyfat a woman carries very, very little fat around their upper body.Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Those pics are far too crappy to see what she is like, unless the pics.bb pic is better. I personally like the thin, hard appearance. I like the look of somebody who's put time into themselves and has achieved something most lack the ability/gumption to achieve. I'm not saying lohan, who needs a burger, but I admire somebody who's got the tenacity to hit the gym hard and consistently.
oh come off it, you elitist. There's nothing wrong with the quality of those pictures. No, they're not 298475o2183741893741035 megapixels with UV lenses and all that crap, but you can perfectly see what's wrong with her. Jesus, it's like you're blind or something.
Granted, she looks a bit gaunt, but those pictures are blurred. The main problem I see is that she's incredibly flat. The only way around that is to either put on fat or get implants. Personally I'd recommend the latter approach.
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
there's a middle ground point between fat and being so thin that your bones hang out.I got down to being really small last year and my chest area looked terrible.I went on hormones this past winter and gained around 7 pounds and I look and feel so much better.My chest came back and my face looks better and I have more energy.
