• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

Page 267 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Josephus312 said:
Not as much as the orange rapist (according to Ivana), sexual assaulter per his own admission and creepy old fuck in teenage girls locker rooms. Not to mention a man who said that he'd date his own daughter if he wasn't her father and agreed that she could be referred to as "a piece of ass".

I mean, that is the standard set for what is acceptable and what you absolutely adore.

But hey, Avenetti who represents woman who was paid off for keeping quiet about Trump fucking her when his wife was at home with their baby... Yeah, he's the creepy guy.

You can't claim the moral high ground, you're deep in the sewer eating shit at this point.
Click to expand...
NO! You mean that Donald Trump actually had sex with a whore and a porn star and then paid her money? I'm shocked, shocked!

That he's a coarse New York asshole? I'm double shocked, shocked!

I'll leave the posturing sanctimony about moral high ground to assclowns like you, i'm just fine living in the real world and winning.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
NO! You mean that Donald Trump actually had sex with a whore and a porn star and then paid her money? I'm shocked, shocked!

That he's a coarse New York asshole? I'm double shocked, shocked!

I'll leave the posturing sanctimony about moral high ground to assclowns like you, i'm just fine living in the real world and winning.
Click to expand...

No, I mean that he raped Ivana, says he wants to date his own daughter and agrees to call her "a piece of ass", enters locker rooms of teenage girls to gawk at them, fucks a porn star with his wife at home taking care of their baby and proclaims to sexually assault women.

That isn't a "coarse NY asshole" in any sense or function of the words used, is it? Do you think this is normal? What the FUCK is wrong with your brain?

Also, given ALL that, you complain about Avenetti being "creepy"? How exactly is he creepy?
 
creep·y
ˈkrēpē/
adjective
INFORMAL
adjective: creepy; comparative adjective: creepier; superlative adjective: creepiest
  1. causing an unpleasant feeling of fear or unease.
    "the creepy feelings one often gets in a strange house"
    synonyms: frightening, eerie, disturbing, sinister, weird, hair-raising, menacing, threatening, eldritch;
    informalspooky, scary, freaky
 
imported_tajmahal said:
NO! You mean that Donald Trump actually had sex with a whore and a porn star and then paid her money? I'm shocked, shocked!

That he's a coarse New York asshole? I'm double shocked, shocked!

I'll leave the posturing sanctimony about moral high ground to assclowns like you, i'm just fine living in the real world and winning.
Click to expand...


And so what if he directed Michael Cohen to illegally use campaign funds to do it?

If he can just grab 'em by the pussy, how does he end up paying for pussy, anyway?
 
imported_tajmahal said:
creep·y
ˈkrēpē/
adjective
INFORMAL
adjective: creepy; comparative adjective: creepier; superlative adjective: creepiest
  1. causing an unpleasant feeling of fear or unease.
    "the creepy feelings one often gets in a strange house"
    synonyms: frightening, eerie, disturbing, sinister, weird, hair-raising, menacing, threatening, eldritch;
    informalspooky, scary, freaky
Click to expand...

Use your own words, I know it's hard for someone with the IQ equivalent of a fucking carrot to speak for himself but at least try.

Again, how is he creepy?
 
Bitek said:
...

However, there was a witness. Mark Judge. But he was never subpoenaed and made to testify in the Senate, nor is it apparent that he was aggressively interviewed by the FBI.
Click to expand...


Ford said he was a witness but that has not been corroborated by anyone unless I missed something. The senate, dems or repubs, did not call anyone else that was supposed to be at the house during the assault to testify for or against Ford.

Has the FBI investigation report been leaked yet? I expect it to be soon but how do you know he was not aggressively interviewed by the FBI?
 
Lanyap said:
Ford said he was a witness but that has not been corroborated by anyone unless I missed something. The senate, dems or repubs, did not call anyone else that was supposed to be at the house during the assault to testify for or against Ford.

Has the FBI investigation report been leaked yet? I expect it to be soon but how do you know he was not aggressively interviewed by the FBI?
Click to expand...
It hasn't been leaked...yet.
I thought that Mr. Judge was one of those interviewed by the FBI in the latest investigation, his lawyer said he was available for questioning. Also his previous statement to the Senate carries the penalty of felony for lies.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
Read my post asshole, or ask again for all i care.
Click to expand...

You know what, you're such a fucking dishonest asshole that there is no point what so ever in this.

You ignore everything you don't want to hear about your Dear Leader and then move on to posting definitions and when asked to actually explain yourself you play dumb... or you are dumb...

You are nothing but a bootlicker and you will never be anything but a bootlicker because that is all you are good for.

And with that you can now go merrily lick some more boots.
 
Jhhnn said:
Tucker Carlson & Fox News portrayed him as creepy, so it must be true-

https://www.ktvb.com/video/syndicat...eepy-porn-lawyer-during-interview/602-8251445

Don't come right out & say it on air- just run it as a banner across the bottom of the page. It's damned near subliminal.
Click to expand...

I should have known, that moron hasn't had an original thought in his mind since he was born, it's just regurgitation of talking points and fingers in ears for what he doesn't want to hear.
 
Josephus312 said:
You know what, you're such a fucking dishonest asshole that there is no point what so ever in this.

You ignore everything you don't want to hear about your Dear Leader and then move on to posting definitions and when asked to actually explain yourself you play dumb... or you are dumb...

You are nothing but a bootlicker and you will never be anything but a bootlicker because that is all you are good for.

And with that you can now go merrily lick some more boots.
Click to expand...
Bullshit, I agreed with some of what you said about Trump, but frankly i don't care. It gets a big "so what?" out of me. Now go cry in a corner or something.
 
Josephus312 said:
I should have known, that moron hasn't had an original thought in his mind since he was born, it's just regurgitation of talking points and fingers in ears for what he doesn't want to hear.
Click to expand...

It's just another of his constant duh-versions, anyway. He'll steer the conversation away from actually talking about Kavanaugh every chance he gets. He injects noise to overcome the signal, kinda like radio jamming.
 
Jhhnn said:
It's just another of his constant duh-versions, anyway. He'll steer the conversation away from actually talking about Kavanaugh every chance he gets. He injects noise to overcome the signal, kinda like radio jamming.
Click to expand...
Except I have been consistently right throughout this thread. I'm just waiting for the final vote tomorrow afternoon.
 
Lanyap said:
Ford said he was a witness but that has not been corroborated by anyone unless I missed something. The senate, dems or repubs, did not call anyone else that was supposed to be at the house during the assault to testify for or against Ford.

Has the FBI investigation report been leaked yet? I expect it to be soon but how do you know he was not aggressively interviewed by the FBI?
Click to expand...


Maybe i spoke too soon, this story must be from the FBI supplemental investigation.
https://hotair.com/archives/2018/10/05/wsj-ford-ally-pressured-keyser-change-story/
or
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/christine-blasey-ford-friend-witness-tampering/
 
Jhhnn said:
And right back around to avoiding the subject of, you know, the lying & dishonest Kavanaugh.
Click to expand...
Your lies and your dishonesty along with the Democrats lies and the Democrats dishonesty. Speaking of which, how are your perjury lies and fabrications going? Lost in the Devils triangle maybe?
 
Maxima1 said:
Elizabeth Warren says this. The others looked at the same documents, so it may give a hint on the way they might vote.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...utter-madness-this-is/?utm_term=.72cc971f11b2

“Senators have been muzzled. So I will now say three things that committee staff has explained are permissible to say without violating committee rules. … One: This was not a full and fair investigation. It was sharply limited in scope and did not explore the relevant confirming facts. Two: The available documents do not exonerate Mr. Kavanaugh.


And three: the available documents contradict statements Mr. Kavanaugh made under oath. I would like to back up these points with explicit statements from the FBI documents — explicit statements that should be available for the American people to see. But the Republicans have locked the documents behind closed doors.”
Click to expand...

I wonder who made the agreement to keep these things secret?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...9630a6d8725_story.html?utm_term=.05b10c16ca8d

The strict confidentiality of the FBI background check file, which will be updated with the bureau’s latest report on the Kavanaugh allegations, is governed by a 2009 agreement between the White House and the Senate Judiciary Committee. That agreement allows only senators and 10 congressional aides with “top secret” clearances to review FBI background information for Supreme Court nominees. Unauthorized disclosure of the material could lead a senator to be expelled or an aide to be fired.

Thanks Obama!

I think it should be made public also.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top